....and calls in to a congressman on an open line:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko

"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."

Priceless.

On Saturday, 26 July 2014 13:22:51 UTC-3, F*O*A*D wrote:
...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko



"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."



Priceless.

Actually, that caller was too polite to be the MinnieMan.... crazy enough but too polite.

On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko



"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."



Priceless.

I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.

On 7/27/14, 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko



"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."



Priceless.

I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.



The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,
of course, he didn't use any curse words.

On Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:59:10 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/27/14, 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko







"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."







Priceless.



I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.







The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"

On 7/27/14, 8:24 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:59:10 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/27/14, 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko







"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."







Priceless.



I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.







The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.