![]() |
|
It's not as easy as it looks.
On 7/26/14, 8:49 AM, True North wrote:
What are you snerking about MiniMan? We all saw that google image of your run down hovel before you ran to Google to smudge it up. Good thing I saved the image before it was too late. One look at that carport and I wondered if I'd see you on the Hoarders reality tv show. Ingerfool is a "full-patch" member of the Flaming Assholes Kiddie Motorbike Club. Here's their club patch with Snotty doing the honors: http://tinyurl.com/k9or2l3 |
It's not as easy as it looks.
True North wrote:
What are you snerking about MiniMan? We all saw that google image of your run down hovel before you ran to Google to smudge it up. Good thing I saved the image before it was too late. One look at that carport and I wondered if I'd see you on the Hoarders reality tv show. He got Google to change a satellite image? Not a chance. You saved the clear image? Not a chance. Don't you have Angry Birds to keep you busy on your Playbook? |
It's not as easy as it looks.
On Saturday, July 26, 2014 11:10:07 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
He got Google to change a satellite image? Not a chance. You saved the clear image? Not a chance. Don't you have Angry Birds to keep you busy on your Playbook? It's quite easy to see the red front door on dickhead donnies house at 6331 EDINBURGH STREET, HALIFAX NOVA SCOTIA. His Wife must still be entertaining Men at night while stupid drives a Mop. |
It's not as easy as it looks.
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:10:07 -0400, Earl
wrote: He got Google to change a satellite image? Not a chance. === It depends. If you have enough clout Google will definitely change their imaging on Google Earth. After we returned from Cancun a few years ago I took a look at the area where we stayed. In several places construction sites had been replaced with architects depictions of what the new resort was expected to look like. Even more interesting, some of the jungle around the Chichen Itza pyramid site has been deliberately obscured, apparently to prevent relic raiders from using Google Earth as a guide. Certain high security areas in the US have also been intentionally obscured, probably at government request. There is nothing to indicate the change, just a blurred image where you were expecting more detail. |
It's not as easy as it looks.
"It's not as easy as it looks?" I didn't see anything easy about it at all!
|
It's not as easy as it looks.
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:10:07 -0400, Earl wrote: He got Google to change a satellite image? Not a chance. === It depends. If you have enough clout Google will definitely change their imaging on Google Earth. After we returned from Cancun a few years ago I took a look at the area where we stayed. In several places construction sites had been replaced with architects depictions of what the new resort was expected to look like. Even more interesting, some of the jungle around the Chichen Itza pyramid site has been deliberately obscured, apparently to prevent relic raiders from using Google Earth as a guide. Certain high security areas in the US have also been intentionally obscured, probably at government request. There is nothing to indicate the change, just a blurred image where you were expecting more detail. He can't afford a decent boat so I'm sure he didn't pay off Google! |
It's not as easy as it looks.
On Friday, 1 August 2014 22:04:31 UTC-3, Earl wrote:
Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:10:07 -0400, Earl wrote: He got Google to change a satellite image? Not a chance. === It depends. If you have enough clout Google will definitely change their imaging on Google Earth. After we returned from Cancun a few years ago I took a look at the area where we stayed. In several places construction sites had been replaced with architects depictions of what the new resort was expected to look like. Even more interesting, some of the jungle around the Chichen Itza pyramid site has been deliberately obscured, apparently to prevent relic raiders from using Google Earth as a guide. Certain high security areas in the US have also been intentionally obscured, probably at government request. There is nothing to indicate the change, just a blurred image where you were expecting more detail. He can't afford a decent boat so I'm sure he didn't pay off Google! Jeez Ditzy...nice way to talk about your L'il Buddy in CT. |
It's not as easy as it looks.
On Friday, August 1, 2014 9:59:03 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 22:04:31 UTC-3, Earl wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:10:07 -0400, Earl wrote: He got Google to change a satellite image? Not a chance. === It depends. If you have enough clout Google will definitely change their imaging on Google Earth. After we returned from Cancun a few years ago I took a look at the area where we stayed. In several places construction sites had been replaced with architects depictions of what the new resort was expected to look like. Even more interesting, some of the jungle around the Chichen Itza pyramid site has been deliberately obscured, apparently to prevent relic raiders from using Google Earth as a guide. Certain high security areas in the US have also been intentionally obscured, probably at government request. There is nothing to indicate the change, just a blurred image where you were expecting more detail. He can't afford a decent boat so I'm sure he didn't pay off Google! Jeez Ditzy...nice way to talk about your L'il Buddy in CT. You keep repeating yourself ...like a fool. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com