.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On 7/14/2014 7:33 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:10:12 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.



No hard data.

Why is your totally uninformed guess any better than the informed
opinion of people who have done a lot of reloading?

For that matter why did you even post that video if you did not have a
clue what he was shooting.

Where is YOUR video. We are all waiting to see the wrist of steel in
action. We do want to see the type of ammo you are using loaded in a
single continuous shot tho ... not that we don't trust you ;-)
A round with a .357 base stamp will do, extra credit for a "Buffalo".



He can't and he won't. Right now Harry is busy playing word games to
back step away from posting something he now regrets. It cracks me up.
He posted the video link to demonstrate "proper grip" when shooting .357
Magnum rounds that minimize muzzle flip but now he accuses everyone,
including himself, of not having definitive data on what kind of ammo
the guy was using in the video. Talk about obfuscation.

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

In article , says...



All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.

At 9:15 in he tries PMC 158 JSP's, and says so.
Calls them "warmer," then "hot."
Plenty of "muzzle flip."
You guys don't even know what you're arguing about.
Gun nut nonsense.

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On 7/14/14, 7:33 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:10:12 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.



No hard data.

Why is your totally uninformed guess any better than the informed
opinion of people who have done a lot of reloading?

For that matter why did you even post that video if you did not have a
clue what he was shooting.

Where is YOUR video. We are all waiting to see the wrist of steel in
action. We do want to see the type of ammo you are using loaded in a
single continuous shot tho ... not that we don't trust you ;-)
A round with a .357 base stamp will do, extra credit for a "Buffalo".


Post a personal video in this cesspool of right-wing assholes? That's a
laugh.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On 7/14/14, 8:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:33 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:10:12 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.



No hard data.

Why is your totally uninformed guess any better than the informed
opinion of people who have done a lot of reloading?

For that matter why did you even post that video if you did not have a
clue what he was shooting.

Where is YOUR video. We are all waiting to see the wrist of steel in
action. We do want to see the type of ammo you are using loaded in a
single continuous shot tho ... not that we don't trust you ;-)
A round with a .357 base stamp will do, extra credit for a "Buffalo".



He can't and he won't. Right now Harry is busy playing word games to
back step away from posting something he now regrets. It cracks me up.
He posted the video link to demonstrate "proper grip" when shooting .357
Magnum rounds that minimize muzzle flip but now he accuses everyone,
including himself, of not having definitive data on what kind of ammo
the guy was using in the video. Talk about obfuscation.



I'm not stepping away from anything. You boys can't quantify the vid as
to the specs of the loads, and all you can do is guess. Guess away.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On 7/14/14, 8:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...



All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.

At 9:15 in he tries PMC 158 JSP's, and says so.
Calls them "warmer," then "hot."
Plenty of "muzzle flip."
You guys don't even know what you're arguing about.
Gun nut nonsense.



Warmer and hot are unquantified, but if he is shooting PMC factory loads
of 158 grains, then the ammo probably is "regular" .357 MAG.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

Actually I did and noticed the factory metal jacket rounds. But it seemed that Harry was concentrating on the minimum barrel rise and said his revolver had even less due to having a heavier barrel. But nothing was mentioned about the lesser recoil due to using half-doped lead loads

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:20:22 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/14/2014 7:33 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:10:12 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.



No hard data.

Why is your totally uninformed guess any better than the informed
opinion of people who have done a lot of reloading?

For that matter why did you even post that video if you did not have a
clue what he was shooting.

Where is YOUR video. We are all waiting to see the wrist of steel in
action. We do want to see the type of ammo you are using loaded in a
single continuous shot tho ... not that we don't trust you ;-)
A round with a .357 base stamp will do, extra credit for a "Buffalo".



He can't and he won't. Right now Harry is busy playing word games to
back step away from posting something he now regrets. It cracks me up.
He posted the video link to demonstrate "proper grip" when shooting .357
Magnum rounds that minimize muzzle flip but now he accuses everyone,
including himself, of not having definitive data on what kind of ammo
the guy was using in the video. Talk about obfuscation.

===

Haven't we seen this movie before?

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On Monday, July 14, 2014 5:33:13 PM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/14/14, 7:33 PM, wrote:

Where is YOUR video. We are all waiting to see the wrist of steel in

action. We do want to see the type of ammo you are using loaded in a

single continuous shot tho ... not that we don't trust you ;-)

A round with a .357 base stamp will do, extra credit for a "Buffalo".





Post a personal video in this cesspool of right-wing assholes? That's a

laugh.

Why not, Harry? You must really love hanging around with "right-wing assholes" because you post here the most....

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On 7/15/14, 8:30 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, July 14, 2014 5:33:13 PM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/14/14, 7:33 PM, wrote:

Where is YOUR video. We are all waiting to see the wrist of steel in

action. We do want to see the type of ammo you are using loaded in a

single continuous shot tho ... not that we don't trust you ;-)

A round with a .357 base stamp will do, extra credit for a "Buffalo".





Post a personal video in this cesspool of right-wing assholes? That's a

laugh.

Why not, Harry? You must really love hanging around with "right-wing assholes" because you post here the most....


It's the aftermath of my college minor, deviant sociology, that keeps me
here and giggling at the righties. "Nuts and Sluts," we used to call it.
Only right-wing nuts here, though, although I think Ingersoll could
qualify as a slut.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

.357 Magnum, handled properly
 

On 7/14/2014 6:37 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/14/14, 8:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...



All we have is unquantified guesses, no hard date. Zip, zilch. It's
certainly okay to question what sorts of rounds he was shooting, but
there are no answers.

At 9:15 in he tries PMC 158 JSP's, and says so.
Calls them "warmer," then "hot."
Plenty of "muzzle flip."
You guys don't even know what you're arguing about.
Gun nut nonsense.



Warmer and hot are unquantified, but if he is shooting PMC factory loads
of 158 grains, then the ammo probably is "regular" .357 MAG.

Regular? Quantify regular, dummy.

--
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them".
Thomas Jefferson