F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.



Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse.



And this is not worse?

On 5/22/14, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.



Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse.



And this is not worse?



Far more diplomats were killed in the Dubya mis-administrations. I don't
recall the righties flipping out over those deaths. And yes, what Nixon
did was worse.

--
If right-wing assholes could fly,
rec.boats would be an airport!

On 5/24/2014 1:08 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:09 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.



Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse.

It is always the coverup isn't it.
Nixon was pushed out over a coverup,
Clinton was impeached because of a coverup and we are still waiting to
see what happens with this coverup.
It took almost 2 years to get to the truth with Nixon and they had
tapes of everything.
Nobody tapes much these days so we are left with trying to reconstruct
deleted Emails.


They just need to frog hop someone out of their office for obstruction
to get things started...

On 5/24/14, 1:08 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:09 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.



Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse.

It is always the coverup isn't it.
Nixon was pushed out over a coverup,
Clinton was impeached because of a coverup and we are still waiting to
see what happens with this coverup.
It took almost 2 years to get to the truth with Nixon and they had
tapes of everything.
Nobody tapes much these days so we are left with trying to reconstruct
deleted Emails.



Nixon's was a sad presidency. He was a good president, he was smart, he
was capable, and he got some things done that needed doing. He was
conservative, but not crazy conservative like so many of today's
Republicans. He was a truly tragic figure.

--
If right-wing assholes could fly,
rec.boats would be an airport!

On 5/24/2014 9:33 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/24/14, 1:08 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:09 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and
nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.



Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse.

It is always the coverup isn't it.
Nixon was pushed out over a coverup,
Clinton was impeached because of a coverup and we are still waiting to
see what happens with this coverup.
It took almost 2 years to get to the truth with Nixon and they had
tapes of everything.
Nobody tapes much these days so we are left with trying to reconstruct
deleted Emails.



Nixon's was a sad presidency. He was a good president, he was smart, he
was capable, and he got some things done that needed doing. He was
conservative, but not crazy conservative like so many of today's
Republicans. He was a truly tragic figure.

As was Clinton. Crazy for Monika. How'd he get caught, by the way?

On 5/22/2014 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.


With harry it was "Scooter Libby, Scooter Libby, Scooter Libby" cause a
republican forgetting a date is much more serious than the POTUS and Sec
of State hiding under a desk during an attack and throwing Americans to
the Wolves to get re-elected...

On 5/22/14, 12:13 PM, KC wrote:
On 5/22/2014 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


Invalid comparison.

Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry.


With harry it was "Scooter Libby, Scooter Libby, Scooter Libby" cause a
republican forgetting a date is much more serious than the POTUS and Sec
of State hiding under a desk during an attack and throwing Americans to
the Wolves to get re-elected...

Libby was just the fall guy for Cheney, moron. And no one except you
hides under the desk. You try to get guys to come to your house to beat
you up. You're **** down your pants if any showed up or if you had the
gas money to make a road trip.




--
If right-wing assholes could fly,
rec.boats would be an airport!

On 5/22/2014 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.


They all are too, they are just paid for....

On 5/22/2014 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.


Yawn, accountability, accountability, accountability... But we know the
Clintons have little regard for life, no matter who's it is... What does
it matter, right?


I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody
died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was
reported stolen.

On 5/22/2014 9:32 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:


Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to stand down. Whoever that coward
turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of
duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does "have
their back" when the chips are down.


This is ****ing amazing. It was Billary, Obummer, Kerry, take your pick
as to which one is the biggest coward in DC.