Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. And this is not worse? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/22/14, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. And this is not worse? Far more diplomats were killed in the Dubya mis-administrations. I don't recall the righties flipping out over those deaths. And yes, what Nixon did was worse. -- If right-wing assholes could fly, rec.boats would be an airport! |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/22/14, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. And this is not worse? Far more diplomats were killed in the Dubya mis-administrations. I don't recall the righties flipping out over those deaths. And yes, what Nixon did was worse. Typical leftist. As long as the government is taking care of me, and not requiring I pay taxes, or sends me a monthly dole, the government and the President is good. Bush, Bush, Bush. Tricky Dick, Tricky Dick, Tricky Dick. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. And this is not worse? Far more diplomats were killed in the Dubya mis-administrations. I don't recall the righties flipping out over those deaths. And yes, what Nixon did was worse. Typical leftist. As long as the government is taking care of me, and not requiring I pay taxes, or sends me a monthly dole, the government and the President is good. Bush, Bush, Bush. Tricky Dick, Tricky Dick, Tricky Dick. The big mouth deadbeat neglects to acknowledge that these deaths may have been prevented. His comparisons are sad for even a rookie "writer". More narcissism, I guess... |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/24/2014 1:08 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:09 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. It is always the coverup isn't it. Nixon was pushed out over a coverup, Clinton was impeached because of a coverup and we are still waiting to see what happens with this coverup. It took almost 2 years to get to the truth with Nixon and they had tapes of everything. Nobody tapes much these days so we are left with trying to reconstruct deleted Emails. They just need to frog hop someone out of their office for obstruction to get things started... |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/24/14, 1:08 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:09 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. It is always the coverup isn't it. Nixon was pushed out over a coverup, Clinton was impeached because of a coverup and we are still waiting to see what happens with this coverup. It took almost 2 years to get to the truth with Nixon and they had tapes of everything. Nobody tapes much these days so we are left with trying to reconstruct deleted Emails. Nixon's was a sad presidency. He was a good president, he was smart, he was capable, and he got some things done that needed doing. He was conservative, but not crazy conservative like so many of today's Republicans. He was a truly tragic figure. -- If right-wing assholes could fly, rec.boats would be an airport! |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/24/2014 9:33 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/24/14, 1:08 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:09 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 11:22 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. Nixon was involved in a criminal coverup and maybe worse. It is always the coverup isn't it. Nixon was pushed out over a coverup, Clinton was impeached because of a coverup and we are still waiting to see what happens with this coverup. It took almost 2 years to get to the truth with Nixon and they had tapes of everything. Nobody tapes much these days so we are left with trying to reconstruct deleted Emails. Nixon's was a sad presidency. He was a good president, he was smart, he was capable, and he got some things done that needed doing. He was conservative, but not crazy conservative like so many of today's Republicans. He was a truly tragic figure. As was Clinton. Crazy for Monika. How'd he get caught, by the way? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/22/2014 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:49:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/22/14, 10:40 AM, wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:42:27 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Yawn. Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. I am old enough to remember "Watergate Watergate Watergate" and nobody died there. A gang of Cubans broke into an office and nothing was reported stolen. Invalid comparison. Yeah, Benghazi was far more serious, people died. Sorry. With harry it was "Scooter Libby, Scooter Libby, Scooter Libby" cause a republican forgetting a date is much more serious than the POTUS and Sec of State hiding under a desk during an attack and throwing Americans to the Wolves to get re-elected... |