On 5/17/2014 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:33:18 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/17/14, 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.


As I said, there were no witnesses.

You are entitled to your own opinion but you can't make up your own
facts.


Why? Harry does it all the time.

On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.

Harry wouldn't have been happy unless there were a couple of f aux wacko
liberal preachers on the panel to tip the scales of justice.

On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.

On 5/17/14, 1:56 PM, KC wrote:
On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that
handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.


Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

On 5/17/2014 3:06 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/17/14, 1:56 PM, KC wrote:
On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that
handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there
were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.


Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

I suspect that he might have considered the possibility of you keeling
over (naut. ref.) before he was able to complete his journey to your
humble abode. Not withstanding, your carcass is not the prize it might
have been at one time. Is it really worth the effort on Scott's part?

wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 15:06:43 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

I hope you get a fair trial.

Between the busted down door or window and the video tape and the history
of threats, I doubt there would be any charges.

The L'il Connecticut Peter Pan may dream of grand adventures slaying his enemies but he's a mini version the whacko in Southern Ontario...all talk and no action...unless someone else does the actions.

On 5/17/14, 4:37 PM, True North wrote:
The L'il Connecticut Peter Pan may dream of grand adventures slaying his enemies but he's a mini version the whacko in Southern Ontario...all talk and no action...unless someone else does the actions.



He's just an unemployable, foul-mouthed, foul-mannered little putz.

On 5/17/14, 5:15 PM, wrote:
On 17 May 2014 20:17:23 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 15:06:43 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

I hope you get a fair trial.

Between the busted down door or window and the video tape and the history
of threats, I doubt there would be any charges.


It sounds like you have this murder well planned out.
Good luck


Murder? Self-defense. It's not some kid carrying a bag of candy walking
through the neighborhood. We're talking about a thug who breaks into a
house looking to cause mayhem and who gets caught in the act by the
occupant and by videotape.

What would you do if a thug violently broke into your house in Florida
while you were sitting on the couch watching your favorite TV
commentator, Ann Coulter? Invite him to sit down for a beer and some
snacks?

On 5/17/2014 3:58 PM, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:
On 5/17/2014 3:06 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/17/14, 1:56 PM, KC wrote:
On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that
handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there
were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.


Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

Are you still hallucinating about shooting somebody? **** you harry, if
I wanted you dead, you would already be rotted and forgotten...


I suspect that he might have considered the possibility of you keeling
over (naut. ref.) before he was able to complete his journey to your
humble abode. Not withstanding, your carcass is not the prize it might
have been at one time. Is it really worth the effort on Scott's part?