On 5/16/14, 4:32 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/16/2014 3:27 PM, jps wrote:

On Thu, 15 May 2014 13:02:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I posed a question to you a week or so ago and don't know if you
responded with an answer or not. Might have missed it.
I asked what *your* position on guns is. Do you favor private ownership
at all of handguns or are you an advocate to outlaw them entirely?



I'm in favor of people being able to defend themselves, their
families, their homes.

I would, however, put stringent controls on the sale, ownership and
transfer of weapons and treat those who misunderstand the law very
harshly.

Reasonable. Many states (including my own) have such statutes on the
books with more being added every year (like Maryland, New York, New
Jersey).

How about concealed carry permits? Does being able to defend yourself
extend beyond your home in your view?





Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

On 5/17/14, 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.


As I said, there were no witnesses and it was Florida. Not too
worry...at some point Zimmerman will start a fight with the wrong woman
and she'll cave in his skull.

On 5/17/14, 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:33:18 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/17/14, 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.


As I said, there were no witnesses.

You are entitled to your own opinion but you can't make up your own
facts.



No one came forward to report what happened at the moment Zimmerman
decided to shoot the kid. As I said, though, no worries...Zimmerman will
be put in his rightful place soon enough, and, I predict, by a woman.

On 5/17/2014 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:33:18 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/17/14, 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.


As I said, there were no witnesses.

You are entitled to your own opinion but you can't make up your own
facts.


Why? Harry does it all the time.

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.

Harry wouldn't have been happy unless there were a couple of f aux wacko
liberal preachers on the panel to tip the scales of justice.

On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.

On 5/17/14, 1:56 PM, KC wrote:
On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that
handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.


Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

On 5/17/2014 3:06 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/17/14, 1:56 PM, KC wrote:
On 5/17/2014 11:51 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 11:36:43 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:

On 5/17/2014 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 10:37:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/16/14, 10:51 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:50:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Under certain circumstances and, of course, if you fire that
handgun and
you miss and hit someone else, you face criminal charges and civil
suits...no excuse that you were "defending yourself."

No "innocent" people were shot by Zimmerman.



I wouldn't take Zimmerman's word on that. Unfortunately, there
were no
other witnesses and it was Florida.

It was decided in a court of law.
There were witnesses that put Martin on top of Zimmerman beating the
**** out of him.

As clear a case of self defense as I've ever seen. No matter if the
aggressor was black, white, or green. Harry needs to get over it.

Yup. They all demanded a trial in a case that was properly handled at
the police station and 2 years and 2 million dollars later, the court
decided it was handled correctly at the police station. Now guys like
Harry are disputing the validity of our justice system.


Only cause it didn't go his way.


Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of suicide?

I suspect that he might have considered the possibility of you keeling
over (naut. ref.) before he was able to complete his journey to your
humble abode. Not withstanding, your carcass is not the prize it might
have been at one time. Is it really worth the effort on Scott's part?