Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On 5/21/2014 3:13 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:50:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/21/14, 12:24 PM, wrote:

What "idiotic laws"? The right to defend yourself when some thug has
you on the ground beating your head into the concrete?


We have nothing but Zimmerman's word on that, and he had prior to that
murder and since a number of incidents in which he acted out physically,
with several women and with a sworn law enforcement officer.

Nobody ever can up with a plausible alternative and the forensic
evidence backed him up.
The main reason we never saw a civil action was the evidence of what a
thug Martin was would have come out.

Martin was cruzin for a bruzin.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On Wed, 21 May 2014 12:15:42 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:49:53 -0700, jps wrote:

Because of the way the idiotic laws in Florida are written. Otherwise,
they thought he put himself in the situation, caused Treyvon's death
and should have been held to account.

===

If someone had you on the ground banging your head against concrete,
how would you like to defend yourself (or not) ?

I wouldn't take someone's life if I was the one who precipitated the
conflct. I'd have taken my lumps as deserved. But I'm not stupid
enough to run around like a vigilante with a gun strapped to my waist
nor provoke people into attacking me.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:50:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/21/14, 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:49:53 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2014 19:22:47 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2014 13:59:36 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 16 May 2014 22:47:22 -0400, wrote:

BTW it was the same prosecutor who went after Zimmerman.
(Angie Corey)
That is why you and Harry are both full of **** here.
She was an equal opportunity fire arm law abuser,

But Zimmerman was standing his ground. As a little dildo is fond of
saying around here. pffffft.

If you are going to make **** up, why stop there? Why not just say he
was car jacking Martin.

The fact is, stand your ground was never even mentioned by the
defense. This was a straight self defense case and the court agreed
with Zimmerman.

Because of the way the idiotic laws in Florida are written. Otherwise,
they thought he put himself in the situation, caused Treyvon's death
and should have been held to account.

What "idiotic laws"? The right to defend yourself when some thug has
you on the ground beating your head into the concrete?


We have nothing but Zimmerman's word on that, and he had prior to that
murder and since a number of incidents in which he acted out physically,
with several women and with a sworn law enforcement officer.

That doesn't matter to Greg. Black man, white man. We know who's
side Greg, Herring and every other "conservative" will be on.

If it were a black man who pursued a white man with the same outcome,
you better believe the black man would be in jail.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/19/14, 7:37 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
On 5/17/14, 1:17 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 15:06:43 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of
suicide?

I hope you get a fair trial.

Between the busted down door or window and the video tape and the history
of threats, I doubt there would be any charges.

no witnesses, you broke the door later. Fair?


You missed the part about the security videotape cameras, I suppose.

Photo shop!

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On Wed, 21 May 2014 12:59:44 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2014 12:15:42 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:49:53 -0700, jps wrote:

Because of the way the idiotic laws in Florida are written. Otherwise,
they thought he put himself in the situation, caused Treyvon's death
and should have been held to account.

===

If someone had you on the ground banging your head against concrete,
how would you like to defend yourself (or not) ?

I wouldn't take someone's life if I was the one who precipitated the
conflct. I'd have taken my lumps as deserved. But I'm not stupid
enough to run around like a vigilante with a gun strapped to my waist
nor provoke people into attacking me.

Wrong scenario, as usual.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:01:39 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:50:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/21/14, 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:49:53 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2014 19:22:47 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2014 13:59:36 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 16 May 2014 22:47:22 -0400, wrote:

BTW it was the same prosecutor who went after Zimmerman.
(Angie Corey)
That is why you and Harry are both full of **** here.
She was an equal opportunity fire arm law abuser,

But Zimmerman was standing his ground. As a little dildo is fond of
saying around here. pffffft.

If you are going to make **** up, why stop there? Why not just say he
was car jacking Martin.

The fact is, stand your ground was never even mentioned by the
defense. This was a straight self defense case and the court agreed
with Zimmerman.

Because of the way the idiotic laws in Florida are written. Otherwise,
they thought he put himself in the situation, caused Treyvon's death
and should have been held to account.

What "idiotic laws"? The right to defend yourself when some thug has
you on the ground beating your head into the concrete?


We have nothing but Zimmerman's word on that, and he had prior to that
murder and since a number of incidents in which he acted out physically,
with several women and with a sworn law enforcement officer.

That doesn't matter to Greg. Black man, white man. We know who's
side Greg, Herring and every other "conservative" will be on.

If it were a black man who pursued a white man with the same outcome,
you better believe the black man would be in jail.

Just call us all racists. That proves your point every time.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On 5/21/14, 5:59 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:01:39 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:50:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/21/14, 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 08:49:53 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2014 19:22:47 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2014 13:59:36 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 16 May 2014 22:47:22 -0400, wrote:

BTW it was the same prosecutor who went after Zimmerman.
(Angie Corey)
That is why you and Harry are both full of **** here.
She was an equal opportunity fire arm law abuser,

But Zimmerman was standing his ground. As a little dildo is fond of
saying around here. pffffft.

If you are going to make **** up, why stop there? Why not just say he
was car jacking Martin.

The fact is, stand your ground was never even mentioned by the
defense. This was a straight self defense case and the court agreed
with Zimmerman.

Because of the way the idiotic laws in Florida are written. Otherwise,
they thought he put himself in the situation, caused Treyvon's death
and should have been held to account.

What "idiotic laws"? The right to defend yourself when some thug has
you on the ground beating your head into the concrete?


We have nothing but Zimmerman's word on that, and he had prior to that
murder and since a number of incidents in which he acted out physically,
with several women and with a sworn law enforcement officer.

That doesn't matter to Greg. Black man, white man. We know who's
side Greg, Herring and every other "conservative" will be on.

If it were a black man who pursued a white man with the same outcome,
you better believe the black man would be in jail.

Just call us all racists. That proves your point every time.


You are a racist, but not all conservatives are.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:59:44 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:

I wouldn't take someone's life if I was the one who precipitated the
conflct. I'd have taken my lumps as deserved.

You've written some stupid things, but that tops it all. If someone were banging your head against the concrete, you would have taken any steps necessary, including taking the aggressor's life, to stop it if you had the means. You know that. Why lie about it?

But I'm not stupid enough to run around like a vigilante with a gun strapped to my waist nor provoke people into attacking me.

Not in evidence. You certainly present as being hot-headed enough to cuss someone out for some perceived slight against you, and that's enough in many neighborhoods to get your head slammed into the ground, or worse.

Of course, you probably act much more civilized when you're *not* hiding behind your keyboard. Cleans your mouth right up, I'll bet.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:01:39 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:


That doesn't matter to Greg. Black man, white man. We know who's
side Greg, Herring and every other "conservative" will be on.

If it were a black man who pursued a white man with the same outcome,
you better believe the black man would be in jail.

Freaking racist asshole.

Totally legal? No arrests...
 

On 5/21/2014 4:16 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/19/14, 7:37 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
On 5/17/14, 1:17 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 15:06:43 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Are you still planning an illegal home invasion down here, or have your
age, infirmities and meds helped you decide against that form of
suicide?

I hope you get a fair trial.

Between the busted down door or window and the video tape and the history
of threats, I doubt there would be any charges.

no witnesses, you broke the door later. Fair?


You missed the part about the security videotape cameras, I suppose.

Photo shop!


I am starting to doubt that harry has ever stood in or stood his ground
in a real fight... if he had, he wouldn't be daydreaming about "how it's
gonna' go down". I suppose hiding and running was something he learned
very early in life.