Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. Maybe in your mind, but that's certainly the way you come across in your postings and comments. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. Maybe in your mind, but that's certainly the way you come across in your postings and comments. Yep. You nailed it. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/14, 9:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests? I might take your comments a tad more seriously if you also aimed them at others here as you do at me. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/2014 9:39 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests? I might take your comments a tad more seriously if you also aimed them at others here as you do at me. Sorry Harry. I've been a participate of this newsgroup for a long time. I know what came first, the chicken or the egg. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/14, 10:22 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:39 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests? I might take your comments a tad more seriously if you also aimed them at others here as you do at me. Sorry Harry. I've been a participate of this newsgroup for a long time. I know what came first, the chicken or the egg. Oh, really? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Your boychicks can't stop their 7th grade behavior even when I'm out of town for a week or two and don't read or post here. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:39 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests? I might take your comments a tad more seriously if you also aimed them at others here as you do at me. Sorry Harry. I've been a participate of this newsgroup for a long time. I know what came first, the chicken or the egg. His rebuttal is something you would hear on a playground. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote: Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver because Matt Dillon had one? I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt Dillon. Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character in Gunsmoke. I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8 What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223? Killing mice in the field? You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests, hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone else on the planet. You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in. You've reached the wrong conclusion...again. If you don't like trolling and strting arguements, why do you do it? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping: Gregg | General | |||
It may have been coming after you, Gregg... | General | |||
Yo Gregg! | General | |||
I blame it on Gregg. | General | |||
(OT) Gift for John H, NOYB, John Gaguin and other right wingers | General |