On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:59:13 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:26:06 -0400, Mucho Loco
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:47:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Saturday, March 22, 2014 9:42:33 AM UTC-7, John H. wrote:

This RC stuff is cool. Might have to do one of these next:



http://www.nitrorcx.com/99b-10016-ye...0-ep-artr.html



Gotta keep the whiner happy, you know!


I
d like to have one of these WW2 "Radio Planes"

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/mqm-33.jpg

Tim, I'm giving some serious thought to getting one of these 'kit' planes and trying to build one
myself. Motors and all the electronics have to be added, but I think much of it can be found used. I
met a guy today who had a whole car full of airplane stuff. He's into jets. Very cool. He was flying
one of these. Fast. Very maneuverable. Electric motor powered.

The RC stuff out there today is unreal.

Here is a model of a BUFF

Link?

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:





Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation"



as a topic worthy of discussion?







Why would you?





Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have

no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based

television series.



Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time"

on a television based on science.



http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc




*My* fellow creationists?

Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me....

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:33:10 AM UTC-7, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:26:06 -0400, Mucho Loco wrote:



On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:47:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:



On Saturday, March 22, 2014 9:42:33 AM UTC-7, John H. wrote:



This RC stuff is cool. Might have to do one of these next:







http://www.nitrorcx.com/99b-10016-ye...0-ep-artr.html







Gotta keep the whiner happy, you know!





I

d like to have one of these WW2 "Radio Planes"



http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/mqm-33.jpg



Tim, I'm giving some serious thought to getting one of these 'kit' planes and trying to build one

myself. Motors and all the electronics have to be added, but I think much of it can be found used. I

met a guy today who had a whole car full of airplane stuff. He's into jets. Very cool. He was flying

one of these. Fast. Very maneuverable. Electric motor powered.



The RC stuff out there today is unreal.



Whoops...this is the kit plane I mentioned:



http://www.nitroplanes.com/95a302-800-f4u-blue-kit.html

I have a brand new string plane like that still in the box. I't about 20 yrs old. Maybe I ought to dig it out and spin it up. Yeah. That's just 10 bucks more than I gave for my Cox powered nitro-burners.

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:18:44 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:34:30 -0400, Mucho Loco
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:59:13 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:26:06 -0400, Mucho Loco
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:47:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Saturday, March 22, 2014 9:42:33 AM UTC-7, John H. wrote:

This RC stuff is cool. Might have to do one of these next:



http://www.nitrorcx.com/99b-10016-ye...0-ep-artr.html



Gotta keep the whiner happy, you know!


I
d like to have one of these WW2 "Radio Planes"

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/mqm-33.jpg

Tim, I'm giving some serious thought to getting one of these 'kit' planes and trying to build one
myself. Motors and all the electronics have to be added, but I think much of it can be found used. I
met a guy today who had a whole car full of airplane stuff. He's into jets. Very cool. He was flying
one of these. Fast. Very maneuverable. Electric motor powered.

The RC stuff out there today is unreal.

Here is a model of a BUFF

Link?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbITzCI2AU0

Very nice. I was impressed with his landing, and the applause indicates the spectators were also.
That's the hardest part of the RC flying.

The C-17 was cool also, and the guy did a good job landing it. The electric ducted fan motors they
have now are unreal. So powerful.

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:20:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:33:10 AM UTC-7, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:26:06 -0400, Mucho Loco wrote:



On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:47:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:



On Saturday, March 22, 2014 9:42:33 AM UTC-7, John H. wrote:



This RC stuff is cool. Might have to do one of these next:







http://www.nitrorcx.com/99b-10016-ye...0-ep-artr.html







Gotta keep the whiner happy, you know!





I

d like to have one of these WW2 "Radio Planes"



http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/mqm-33.jpg



Tim, I'm giving some serious thought to getting one of these 'kit' planes and trying to build one

myself. Motors and all the electronics have to be added, but I think much of it can be found used. I

met a guy today who had a whole car full of airplane stuff. He's into jets. Very cool. He was flying

one of these. Fast. Very maneuverable. Electric motor powered.



The RC stuff out there today is unreal.



Whoops...this is the kit plane I mentioned:



http://www.nitroplanes.com/95a302-800-f4u-blue-kit.html

I have a brand new string plane like that still in the box. I't about 20 yrs old. Maybe I ought to dig it out and spin it up. Yeah. That's just 10 bucks more than I gave for my Cox powered nitro-burners.

You mean a 'u-control' plane? You could probably put an electric motor in it and have a blast.

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:





Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation"



as a topic worthy of discussion?







Why would you?





Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have

no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based

television series.



Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time"

on a television based on science.



http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc




*My* fellow creationists?

Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me....

Harry seems to think that being a Christian automatically makes one a 'creationist' who takes every
word in the Bible literally.

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 1:04:11 PM UTC-7, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:



On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:

Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me....



Harry seems to think that being a Christian automatically makes one a 'creationist' who takes every

word in the Bible literally.

John, I'd say that's a fairly good summary.

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:11:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 1:04:11 PM UTC-7, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:



On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:

Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me....



Harry seems to think that being a Christian automatically makes one a 'creationist' who takes every

word in the Bible literally.

John, I'd say that's a fairly good summary.

Answer your phone!

On 3/23/14, 2:15 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:





Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation"



as a topic worthy of discussion?







Why would you?





Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have

no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based

television series.



Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time"

on a television based on science.



http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc




*My* fellow creationists?

Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me....



Oh, I thought you took the bible literally. Had no idea you were one of
those "I believe what I choose and ignore the rest" guys.

--
Rand Paul & Ted Cruz…your 2016 GOP nominees, because ‘Mericans deserve
crazy!

On Sunday, March 23, 2014 5:44:16 PM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:


Oh, I thought you took the bible literally. Had no idea you were one of

those "I believe what I choose and ignore the rest" guys.


Still trolling, hey Harry?