Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 05:15:46 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 7:17:03 AM UTC-7, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote: On 3/22/2014 10:02 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/22/14, 10:00 AM, Mucho Loco wrote: 'Nuff said. JohnnyMop thinks he is in control. Of what? Yeah.... of what? I'm kinda wondering that myself... Me three....? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation" as a topic worthy of discussion? Why would you? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation" as a topic worthy of discussion? Why would you? Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based television series. Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time" on a television based on science. http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc -- Rand Paul & Ted Cruz…your 2016 GOP nominees, because ‘Mericans deserve crazy! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation" as a topic worthy of discussion? Why would you? Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based television series. Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time" on a television based on science. http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc *My* fellow creationists? Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me.... |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation" as a topic worthy of discussion? Why would you? Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based television series. Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time" on a television based on science. http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc *My* fellow creationists? Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me.... Harry seems to think that being a Christian automatically makes one a 'creationist' who takes every word in the Bible literally. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 1:04:11 PM UTC-7, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:15:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote: Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me.... Harry seems to think that being a Christian automatically makes one a 'creationist' who takes every word in the Bible literally. John, I'd say that's a fairly good summary. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/23/14, 2:15 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 8:10:40 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/23/14, 8:13 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, March 22, 2014 6:35:31 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote: Why would a science-based program seriously consider "special creation" as a topic worthy of discussion? Why would you? Perhaps because I think it humorous that proponents of beliefs that have no science behind them want those beliefs discussed on a science-based television series. Maybe you should ask your fellow creationists why they want "equal time" on a television based on science. http://tinyurl.com/o26amgc *My* fellow creationists? Harry you''re the one trolling this in rec.boats. not me.... Oh, I thought you took the bible literally. Had no idea you were one of those "I believe what I choose and ignore the rest" guys. -- Rand Paul & Ted Cruz…your 2016 GOP nominees, because ‘Mericans deserve crazy! |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 5:44:16 PM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
Oh, I thought you took the bible literally. Had no idea you were one of those "I believe what I choose and ignore the rest" guys. Still trolling, hey Harry? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Closet Power Boater | ASA |