On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:14:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

... about George W. Bush, but he wouldn't have stood for Russian
aggression in the Ukraine. He'd have invaded New Zealand and Australia
by now, and championed legislation banning gay marriages between
marsupials.

I suppose you have to come up with bull**** posts when your boy is making a total ass of himself
worldwide.

Must be as embarrassing as having a load of **** in your trousers.

On 3/4/14, 11:05 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:14:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

... about George W. Bush, but he wouldn't have stood for Russian
aggression in the Ukraine. He'd have invaded New Zealand and Australia
by now, and championed legislation banning gay marriages between
marsupials.

I suppose you have to come up with bull**** posts when your boy is making a total ass of himself
worldwide.

Must be as embarrassing as having a load of **** in your trousers.


You would be the ranking and rank expert on having a load of **** in
your trousers. Really, Johnny, you should get some help for your anger
issues and your encroaching Alzheimers. You're sounding more and more
like Ingersoll.

On 3/4/14, 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:14:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

... about George W. Bush, but he wouldn't have stood for Russian
aggression in the Ukraine. He'd have invaded New Zealand and Australia
by now, and championed legislation banning gay marriages between
marsupials.

If Australia had hosted the people who killed 3000 Americans we
probably would have sent in a team to try to kill them like we did in
Afghanistan. It was the Democrats who complained that we did not have
enough troops there.

As for your hypothetical New Zealand, if they threatened Israel, we
would be in their ass too (like Iraq, Iran and Syria)




Oooh...you try so very hard. "A" for effort.