Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)

Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used
against the threat. You know,
like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown.

I predict you will be involved in a shooting.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:18:16 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 2:16 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:11:31 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:06 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:35:31 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


If you tell him to drop the weapon and he doesn't do so, then he's a
threat. I'd shoot him, perhaps
not to kill, but to be sure he can't get to me with the weapon. And,
if I missed and killed him,
then I'd not mention that the armed, home invader said he wasn't going to hurt me.

You'd shoot him? From what you have posted here, your shooting game is
worse than your golf game. Better get real close.

Gosh, foad, what have I said that makes you think I couldn't hit a
person standing across the room?
As long as I can hit a cantaloupe at a dozen yards, I'll be OK.


I doubt you can hit a watermelon at 36 feet.

I'm sure not the one doing the bragging about out shooting all the cops
at the shooting range! I
doubt if I'll ever be half as good a shot as you say you are.

Never said I could outshoot all the cops at a shooting range. You really do
have a problem with reading comprehension. Or perhaps something more
significant.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:28:04 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:


You're the one who made the accusations. You spend so much time chasing your tail you forget where

you start.

Now THAT is an interesting observance. I've known of people who have swayed off their original point they forget where they are.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:28:04 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:


You're the one who made the accusations. You spend so much time chasing
your tail you forget where

you start.

Now THAT is an interesting observance. I've known of people who have
swayed off their original point they forget where they are.

Perhaps John can blame it on agent orange.. Hmmm. Voice dictation app did
not capitalize agent orange. The question remains, is Rec.boats significant
enough to bother typing responses? Nah. The dictation app will have to do.
😄

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.

Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 2:42 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:28:04 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:


You're the one who made the accusations. You spend so much time chasing
your tail you forget where

you start.

Now THAT is an interesting observance. I've known of people who have
swayed off their original point they forget where they are.

Perhaps John can blame it on agent orange.. Hmmm. Voice dictation app did
not capitalize agent orange. The question remains, is Rec.boats significant
enough to bother typing responses? Nah. The dictation app will have to do.
😄

I'd love to see you doing that when the landlady is home. If she knew
what you're doing here, she'd have you committed.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.



For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun?
How many people has he shot?

The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so
he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not.

Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been
proven.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 2:43 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



You'd think Harry would be smart enough to figure that out on his own.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 2:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.

Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.


Even if what you say is true, it has no bearing on the skittles boy case.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)

Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used
against the threat. You know,
like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown.

I predict you will be involved in a shooting.

If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 4:27 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)

No, but the thug life is.... Martin picked a fight against what he
thought was gonna' be an easy mark for a coward... he lost...



Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used
against the threat. You know,
like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown.

I predict you will be involved in a shooting.

If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too
loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.



For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun?
How many people has he shot?

The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so
he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not.

Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been
proven.

The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had
"altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think
withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of
these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be
disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/14, 4:27 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)

Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used
against the threat. You know,
like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown.

I predict you will be involved in a shooting.

If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it.


Yeah, right, someone who insults you in the WalMart parking lot, the
center of your life's activities.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/14, 4:31 PM, KC wrote:


No, but the thug life is....

And you are what, a thug-ette?

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 4:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too
loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the
prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in
fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around
armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.



For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun?
How many people has he shot?

The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so
he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not.

Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been
proven.

The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had
"altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think
withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of
these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be
disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him.

He shot the skittles kid dead to save his life. You'd so the same to
save your miserable hide, or maybe just for kicks.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 5:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too
loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the
prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in
fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around
armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.



For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun?
How many people has he shot?

The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so
he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not.

Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been
proven.

The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had
"altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think
withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of
these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be
disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him.


I agree that he seems to be hot headed and I am not defending his
personality. All I am saying is (and as the evidence in the trial
indicated) Zimmerman was justifiably in fear for his life or serious
bodily harm. Nothing else ... his background ... Martin's background
.... skittles or no skittles matters. The jury came to the same conclusion.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:15:56 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 4:27 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :)

Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used
against the threat. You know,
like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown.

I predict you will be involved in a shooting.

If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it.


Yeah, right, someone who insults you in the WalMart parking lot, the
center of your life's activities.

Do you think someone's attempted insults could be worse than your attempts?

I've not gone to your place yet. Although I'll have to admit, that red barn of yours sure looks
photogenic from the air.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:31:50 -0600, HanK wrote:

On 2/26/2014 4:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too
loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the
prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in
fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around
armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.



For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun?
How many people has he shot?

The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so
he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not.

Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been
proven.

The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had
"altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think
withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of
these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be
disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him.

He shot the skittles kid dead to save his life. You'd so the same to
save your miserable hide, or maybe just for kicks.

Not foad.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 26 Feb 2014 20:42:01 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Voice dictation app did
not capitalize agent orange. The question remains, is Rec.boats significant
enough to bother typing responses? Nah. The dictation app will have to do.

===

Judging from your recent typos, your dictation app sucks big time.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:15:56 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Yeah, right, someone who insults you in the WalMart parking lot, the
center of your life's activities.

===

I have it on good authority that you were recently seen in a Walmart
parking lot.

Be careful, they are everywhere and you know it.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/14, 5:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 5:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".

Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet?


One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat.



Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too
loud? :)




The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that
Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the
prosecution
in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds,
including the jury.

The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of
Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and
apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent
danger of death or of serious bodily harm.

I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his*
life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not
what
you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his
following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are
life
threatening activities.

Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head
pounded
against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in
fear
of death or serious bodily harm to me.



Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around
armed
so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights.



For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun?
How many people has he shot?

The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so
he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not.

Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been
proven.

The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had
"altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think
withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of
these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be
disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him.


I agree that he seems to be hot headed and I am not defending his
personality. All I am saying is (and as the evidence in the trial
indicated) Zimmerman was justifiably in fear for his life or serious
bodily harm. Nothing else ... his background ... Martin's background
... skittles or no skittles matters. The jury came to the same conclusion.




Zimmerman *claims* he was in fear for his life, and apparently that's
all you need to walk away from a murder charge in Florida. But, hey,
justice will Zimmerman, sooner rather than later.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/2014 6:23 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Let me bring you up to speed on the Zimmerman case. He was found not
guilty by a jury of his peers.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/26/14, 7:48 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?



I wasn't even aware of the incident until I read about it here. I don't
get the local newspaper, and I rarely read the Metro section of the
Washington Post. And wasn't the shooting about a year ago?

You, on the other hand, are still in denial about the MS-13 gang
activity in your immediate area, a lot closer than the shooting you
referenced is to where we are. The shooting wasn't in my backyard or
even close to it. It was on the other side of Route 4 and then at least
a couple of miles towards the Pax River.

The real news around here is in trying to find out why in the last month
two cars driving on the road immediately outside the subdivision
ran off the road and into a drainage ditch in front of the brick
subdivision entrance sign.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:08:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:48 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?



I wasn't even aware of the incident until I read about it here. I don't
get the local newspaper, and I rarely read the Metro section of the
Washington Post. And wasn't the shooting about a year ago?

You, on the other hand, are still in denial about the MS-13 gang
activity in your immediate area, a lot closer than the shooting you
referenced is to where we are. The shooting wasn't in my backyard or
even close to it. It was on the other side of Route 4 and then at least
a couple of miles towards the Pax River.

Denial? You've inspired so much fear in my bones that I've actually bought firearms for protection!

Tell me, you who doesn't read the metro section. Where do you get all your news about the 'MS-!3'
gang activity in my area? I live here, and I don't hear about it. You've been my only source.

foad, you wouldn't be bull****ting the troops again, would you?

I know, it's hard to weave a web and keep it untangled.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/27/14, 7:53 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:08:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:48 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?



I wasn't even aware of the incident until I read about it here. I don't
get the local newspaper, and I rarely read the Metro section of the
Washington Post. And wasn't the shooting about a year ago?

You, on the other hand, are still in denial about the MS-13 gang
activity in your immediate area, a lot closer than the shooting you
referenced is to where we are. The shooting wasn't in my backyard or
even close to it. It was on the other side of Route 4 and then at least
a couple of miles towards the Pax River.

Denial? You've inspired so much fear in my bones that I've actually bought firearms for protection!

Tell me, you who doesn't read the metro section. Where do you get all your news about the 'MS-!3'
gang activity in my area? I live here, and I don't hear about it. You've been my only source.



If I were as snarly towards non-whites, gays, and Latinos as you are, I
wouldn't leave your house unheeled, either. It's a tiny bit of fun
watching you trying to wiggle yourself off the racist hook. Keep on
keeping on.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 7:53 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:08:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:48 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?



I wasn't even aware of the incident until I read about it here. I don't
get the local newspaper, and I rarely read the Metro section of the
Washington Post. And wasn't the shooting about a year ago?

You, on the other hand, are still in denial about the MS-13 gang
activity in your immediate area, a lot closer than the shooting you
referenced is to where we are. The shooting wasn't in my backyard or
even close to it. It was on the other side of Route 4 and then at least
a couple of miles towards the Pax River.

Denial? You've inspired so much fear in my bones that I've actually bought firearms for protection!

Tell me, you who doesn't read the metro section. Where do you get all your news about the 'MS-!3'
gang activity in my area? I live here, and I don't hear about it. You've been my only source.



If I were as snarly towards non-whites, gays, and Latinos as you are, I
wouldn't leave your house unheeled, either. It's a tiny bit of fun
watching you trying to wiggle yourself off the racist hook. Keep on
keeping on.

Tell me, you who doesn't read the metro section. Where do you get all your news about the 'MS-!3'
gang activity in my area? I live here, and I don't hear about it. You've been my only source.

Is it another 'story'?

And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying
to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/27/14, 8:10 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying
to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!


You've posted any number of anti-woman jokes here, so perhaps we should
add misogynist to your list of negative attributes. And you plan on
giving a child a firearm. Hmmm.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:18:20 AM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 8:10 AM, Poco Loco wrote:

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:





And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying

to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!





... And you plan on giving a child a firearm. Hmmm.

What's the deal about that, Harry. I had my first .22 when I was 7. I got a .357 when I was 12. I've never gone through a gun safety course, and at the moment I'm 58 I've never committed a crime with a firearm.

There's lots of target teams for youth using firearms. usually of low caliber weapons but hey, a gun is a gun....

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/27/2014 7:05 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 7:53 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:08:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:48 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you
are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?



I wasn't even aware of the incident until I read about it here. I don't
get the local newspaper, and I rarely read the Metro section of the
Washington Post. And wasn't the shooting about a year ago?

You, on the other hand, are still in denial about the MS-13 gang
activity in your immediate area, a lot closer than the shooting you
referenced is to where we are. The shooting wasn't in my backyard or
even close to it. It was on the other side of Route 4 and then at least
a couple of miles towards the Pax River.

Denial? You've inspired so much fear in my bones that I've actually
bought firearms for protection!

Tell me, you who doesn't read the metro section. Where do you get all
your news about the 'MS-!3'
gang activity in my area? I live here, and I don't hear about it.
You've been my only source.



If I were as snarly towards non-whites, gays, and Latinos as you are, I
wouldn't leave your house unheeled, either. It's a tiny bit of fun
watching you trying to wiggle yourself off the racist hook. Keep on
keeping on.

Please show a scrap of evidence that anything you just said is true.
You can't, can you?
Why do you make things up?
Why do you lie?
With the exception of Donnie, who are you trying to impress?

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:18:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 8:10 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying
to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!


You've posted any number of anti-woman jokes here, so perhaps we should
add misogynist to your list of negative attributes. And you plan on
giving a child a firearm. Hmmm.

Hell, I've posted even more anti-man jokes here! What other name can you add to the list. What does
my Krause-proclaimed 'hatred of women' have to do with giving a 16-year-old a rifle?

Oh, and please tell us your source for all your MS-13 proclamations.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:12:22 -0600, HanK wrote:

On 2/27/2014 7:05 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 7:53 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:08:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:48 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:23:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/26/14, 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:13 -0500, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 2/26/14, 12:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


"One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements
toward the
homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life."

Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the
homeowner on
the other side of the door. Home invasion.

I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun".


A bag of Skittles, right?

If they were black Crump would be saying they were on their way home
from softball practice and their car broke down.
Nobody including me cares that some white trash guy was shot and I
wouldn't even care if they shot the crack whore girl friend in the
back of the head as she was driving away but I would like fairness.



Sorry, but obviously I don't follow these cases as closely as you do.
You know their names?

Given that the incident occurred in your back yard, I'd suggest you
are pretending your ignorance.
But that wouldn't be the first time, eh?



I wasn't even aware of the incident until I read about it here. I don't
get the local newspaper, and I rarely read the Metro section of the
Washington Post. And wasn't the shooting about a year ago?

You, on the other hand, are still in denial about the MS-13 gang
activity in your immediate area, a lot closer than the shooting you
referenced is to where we are. The shooting wasn't in my backyard or
even close to it. It was on the other side of Route 4 and then at least
a couple of miles towards the Pax River.

Denial? You've inspired so much fear in my bones that I've actually
bought firearms for protection!

Tell me, you who doesn't read the metro section. Where do you get all
your news about the 'MS-!3'
gang activity in my area? I live here, and I don't hear about it.
You've been my only source.



If I were as snarly towards non-whites, gays, and Latinos as you are, I
wouldn't leave your house unheeled, either. It's a tiny bit of fun
watching you trying to wiggle yourself off the racist hook. Keep on
keeping on.

Please show a scrap of evidence that anything you just said is true.
You can't, can you?
Why do you make things up?
Why do you lie?
With the exception of Donnie, who are you trying to impress?

It appears Don isn't too impressed. He hasn't sucked up any honkers in a while!

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/27/14, 10:03 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:18:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 8:10 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying
to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!


You've posted any number of anti-woman jokes here, so perhaps we should
add misogynist to your list of negative attributes. And you plan on
giving a child a firearm. Hmmm.

Hell, I've posted even more anti-man jokes here! What other name can you add to the list. What does
my Krause-proclaimed 'hatred of women' have to do with giving a 16-year-old a rifle?

Oh, and please tell us your source for all your MS-13 proclamations.



Seek and ye shall find.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:13:06 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 10:03 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:18:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 8:10 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying
to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!


You've posted any number of anti-woman jokes here, so perhaps we should
add misogynist to your list of negative attributes. And you plan on
giving a child a firearm. Hmmm.

Hell, I've posted even more anti-man jokes here! What other name can you add to the list. What does
my Krause-proclaimed 'hatred of women' have to do with giving a 16-year-old a rifle?

Oh, and please tell us your source for all your MS-13 proclamations.



Seek and ye shall find.

LOL! Caught again, eh Krause? What a tangled web, eh?

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

Johnny, why do you persist in trying to drag me into your games.
You constantly complain about Harry yet you seem to be the agitator.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/27/14, 10:14 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:13:06 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 10:03 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:18:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 8:10 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:05:17 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


And, BTW, you left off homophobic, Mexican-hating, women-raping, and baby-killing. If you're trying
to convince all here what a 'bad' person I am, don't be leaving **** out!!


You've posted any number of anti-woman jokes here, so perhaps we should
add misogynist to your list of negative attributes. And you plan on
giving a child a firearm. Hmmm.

Hell, I've posted even more anti-man jokes here! What other name can you add to the list. What does
my Krause-proclaimed 'hatred of women' have to do with giving a 16-year-old a rifle?

Oh, and please tell us your source for all your MS-13 proclamations.



Seek and ye shall find.

LOL! Caught again, eh Krause? What a tangled web, eh?


You really truly have cognitive problems. Alzheimer's?

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On 2/27/14, 11:23 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:03:50 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:



There's no proof Gregg presented here that shows he "hit the nail on the
head," there's just his opinion. And your boy Zimmerman is still out
there, getting himself in trouble. It's only a matter of time before he
shoots someone else or someone shoots him.

Once again, you demonstrate your inability to read for comprehension and
to handle abstractions.

If the media followed this ex cop around 24-7 waiting for him to do
something wrong I am sure we would see him speeding and arguing with
his family too.


Uh huh. Sure. It never ceases to amaze me how much slack you righties
are willing to cut Zimmerman, who is a hot-tempered little thug. He gets
into bar fights, his ex-wife dumped him because of his short temper, he
shoots a kid, he gets into fights with his current girlfriend and breaks
furniture and computer gear, He's out of control and shouldn't legally
be allowed near firearms.

Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
 

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:57:57 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

Johnny, why do you persist in trying to drag me into your games.
You constantly complain about Harry yet you seem to be the agitator.

Thanks, Don. Harry needed that.