On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:43:47 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/17/2014 8:07 PM, Tim wrote:

When science *CAN* prove there *IS NOT* a Divine Creator- I'll believe that science.

I don't want to pick on you but it's a good example.

The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim, not those
who doubt the claim due to lack of evidence.

If I claim there is an invisible pink unicorn in my garage that directs
the universe and farts rainbows I hope you wouldn't just believe it.

Perhaps he should have said , "When science *can* prove the big bang theory, I'll believe that
science!"