| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Pocket Holster for P938
I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the
holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/7/2014 12:09 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. That's the one I had ... or one very similar. I liked it a lot. After a few uses it "molds" itself to the shape of the gun. I'd give you one one I had but I included it with the Bodyguard when I sold it. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:57:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/7/2014 12:09 PM, Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. That's the one I had ... or one very similar. I liked it a lot. After a few uses it "molds" itself to the shape of the gun. I'd give you one one I had but I included it with the Bodyguard when I sold it. It would probably be too tight a fit. These guys don't use the same holster for very many different guns. I like the Nemesis the best. The 'Super Fly' doesn't look as though it could grab the pocket when drawing the pistol. |
Pocket Holster for P938
Poco Loco wrote:
I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote:
Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:23:29 -0500, Earl__ wrote:
Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... Worked for me, but the company has been having problems with it's web site. Try this: http://www.desantisholster.com/store/SEARCH-BY-GUN-MANUFACTURER/SIG-SAUER/sig-p938/pocket-holsters/The-Nemesis or: http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desantis-holsters_n38bj.html?gclid=CI6Ox6nj0LwCFeRi7AodfVMA 4g |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote:
On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g Try before you buy. ;-) |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:44:32 -0500, HanK wrote:
On 2/16/2014 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g Try before you buy. ;-) I wish I could find one in a store around here. Luckily they're not horribly expensive. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 11:30 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:44:32 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/16/2014 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g Try before you buy. ;-) I wish I could find one in a store around here. Luckily they're not horribly expensive. Any decent gunshop should have them. I bought mine at a small, local shop. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 11:37 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/16/2014 11:30 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:44:32 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/16/2014 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g Try before you buy. ;-) I wish I could find one in a store around here. Luckily they're not horribly expensive. Any decent gunshop should have them. I bought mine at a small, local shop. With that pistol in his pocket, John will be equipped for his next trip to Florida, in case he encounters any dark-skinned teenagers at Wal-Mart. :) |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:37:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/16/2014 11:30 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:44:32 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/16/2014 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g Try before you buy. ;-) I wish I could find one in a store around here. Luckily they're not horribly expensive. Any decent gunshop should have them. I bought mine at a small, local shop. I suppose the key word is 'decent', within a few miles. It costs very little to send the thing back. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:48:35 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 11:37 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/16/2014 11:30 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:44:32 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/16/2014 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:17:45 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/15/2014 11:23 PM, Earl__ wrote: Poco Loco wrote: I got an email yesterday from Optics Planet saying it would be 2-4 months before they could ship the holster I'd ordered. Found these today. Looking for advice from you knowledgeable folks. http://tinyurl.com/omdbmfy I'm thinking of the 'Nemesis', in the middle. The link is dead... The link goes to DeSantis pocket holsters. I must have a cookie in my machine 'cause I go right to the site. He http://www.copsplus.com/11676_desant...Ri7AodfVMA 4g Try before you buy. ;-) I wish I could find one in a store around here. Luckily they're not horribly expensive. Any decent gunshop should have them. I bought mine at a small, local shop. With that pistol in his pocket, John will be equipped for his next trip to Florida, in case he encounters any dark-skinned teenagers at Wal-Mart. :) Trying hard, eh? How about the 'Same Sex Union Tax Credit'? Good idea, eh? How about 'Pro-Choice' for labor union membership? Good idea, eh? BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:00:14 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Invariably when I see reports of vicious sex offenders getting a hand slap, it's from some liberal judge. The 60-year sentence came from the news, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-jury/5501117/ Like I say, you libs are sure quick to judge and convict folks. Do you reckon the jury was just a bunch of bad Republicans? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 3:14 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:00:14 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Invariably when I see reports of vicious sex offenders getting a hand slap, it's from some liberal judge. The 60-year sentence came from the news, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-jury/5501117/ Like I say, you libs are sure quick to judge and convict folks. Do you reckon the jury was just a bunch of bad Republicans? I think Florida's dumb stand your ground law has had a major negative impact on that state, and it manifests itself in many way in murder cases, even when it is not specifically invoked. Your comment "You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt" is, I presume, just a generic "whine" against those who politics are not like yours. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Even weirder than the Zimmerman verdict. The bozo shot at the kids in their car and killed one of them. Second-degree murder at the least. My guess is that the white members of the jury voted not to convict him of the murder charge, thus resulting in a hung jury on that charge. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:20:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Even weirder than the Zimmerman verdict. The bozo shot at the kids in their car and killed one of them. Second-degree murder at the least. My guess is that the white members of the jury voted not to convict him of the murder charge, thus resulting in a hung jury on that charge. Ah, racism. Should have known. But, even the white folks found him guilty of the other charges. Maybe they aren't as racist as you think? They could have voted 'innocent' of everything, you know. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:18:24 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 3:14 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:00:14 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Invariably when I see reports of vicious sex offenders getting a hand slap, it's from some liberal judge. The 60-year sentence came from the news, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-jury/5501117/ Like I say, you libs are sure quick to judge and convict folks. Do you reckon the jury was just a bunch of bad Republicans? I think Florida's dumb stand your ground law has had a major negative impact on that state, and it manifests itself in many way in murder cases, even when it is not specifically invoked. Your comment "You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt" is, I presume, just a generic "whine" against those who politics are not like yours. Well, you're probably right. Most of the lenient judges I've heard of have politics unlike mine. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car. Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 3:33 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:18:24 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 3:14 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:00:14 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Invariably when I see reports of vicious sex offenders getting a hand slap, it's from some liberal judge. The 60-year sentence came from the news, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-jury/5501117/ Like I say, you libs are sure quick to judge and convict folks. Do you reckon the jury was just a bunch of bad Republicans? I think Florida's dumb stand your ground law has had a major negative impact on that state, and it manifests itself in many way in murder cases, even when it is not specifically invoked. Your comment "You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt" is, I presume, just a generic "whine" against those who politics are not like yours. Well, you're probably right. Most of the lenient judges I've heard of have politics unlike mine. Fortunately most of those with politics like yours are aging and dying, but my hope is that you live a nice, long healthy life so that you can enjoy a society dominated by issues and groups you hate. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:48:28 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 3:33 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:18:24 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 3:14 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:00:14 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Invariably when I see reports of vicious sex offenders getting a hand slap, it's from some liberal judge. The 60-year sentence came from the news, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-jury/5501117/ Like I say, you libs are sure quick to judge and convict folks. Do you reckon the jury was just a bunch of bad Republicans? I think Florida's dumb stand your ground law has had a major negative impact on that state, and it manifests itself in many way in murder cases, even when it is not specifically invoked. Your comment "You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt" is, I presume, just a generic "whine" against those who politics are not like yours. Well, you're probably right. Most of the lenient judges I've heard of have politics unlike mine. Fortunately most of those with politics like yours are aging and dying, but my hope is that you live a nice, long healthy life so that you can enjoy a society dominated by issues and groups you hate. Hate? I don't even hate you! Hate is an emotion that requires energy. It's stupid. I don't even hate dog ****. I understand why you post the stuff you post. But, I sure don't hate you for it. Hell, I've even adopted one of your principle beliefs, that LGBTQs shouldn't be judged by us, and should be allowed, nay - encouraged - to form unions. I think they should get a tax credit for doing so, as long as they don't make children. I can't understand why more Republicans don't jump on that idea. I'm thinking that Republicans, if they were smart, would jump all over an increase in minimum pay, and make sure they're at least $1/hour over what the Democrats want. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:34:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car. Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh? Don't know. The jury, all racists as you say, was hung. But, shouldn't you have him filtered, if he is what you say? And, just 'cause there's no gun, doesn't mean it wasn't chucked out the window, right? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. |
Pocket Holster for P938
|
Pocket Holster for P938
|
Pocket Holster for P938
In article , says...
On 2/16/14, 3:14 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:00:14 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Invariably when I see reports of vicious sex offenders getting a hand slap, it's from some liberal judge. The 60-year sentence came from the news, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...-jury/5501117/ Like I say, you libs are sure quick to judge and convict folks. Do you reckon the jury was just a bunch of bad Republicans? I think Florida's dumb stand your ground law has had a major negative impact on that state, and it manifests itself in many way in murder cases, even when it is not specifically invoked. Why are you so ****ed off about Florida's SYG law and not the other 22 states SYG laws? Does Florida have a special place in your black heart? Your comment "You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt" is, I presume, just a generic "whine" against those who politics are not like yours. What do you believe your punishiment should be for killing someone whose only action, not crime, was to knock on your front door? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 3:31 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
Even weirder than the Zimmerman verdict. The bozo shot at the kids in their car and killed one of them. Second-degree murder at the least. My guess is that the white members of the jury voted not to convict him of the murder charge, thus resulting in a hung jury on that charge. Ah, racism. Should have known. But, even the white folks found him guilty of the other charges. Maybe they aren't as racist as you think? They could have voted 'innocent' of everything, you know. I fail to understand why you would even address such a ridiculously childish and just plain stupid comment... |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 4:28 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:34:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car. Sure there is, there is testimony... why do you always have to ask questions filled with lies? Can't support your point any other way? Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh? Don't know. The jury, all racists as you say, was hung. But, shouldn't you have him filtered, if he is what you say? And, just 'cause there's no gun, doesn't mean it wasn't chucked out the window, right? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 6:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. Well, based on what I know.. the guy should be locked up for life... Of course I/we know from the coverage about his letters and such, the Jury never heard that.. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 18:01:05 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. I haven't watched it. Have paid little attention to the news reports about it. I just think it's humorous for the righteous among us to be judge, jury, and all-but executioner. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 6:57 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/16/2014 6:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. Well, based on what I know.. the guy should be locked up for life... Of course I/we know from the coverage about his letters and such, the Jury never heard that.. What *you* know? What do you know? |
Pocket Holster for P938
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:24:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 6:57 PM, KC wrote: On 2/16/2014 6:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. Well, based on what I know.. the guy should be locked up for life... Of course I/we know from the coverage about his letters and such, the Jury never heard that.. What *you* know? What do you know? At least as much as you, and you've found him guilty. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/14, 9:25 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:24:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 6:57 PM, KC wrote: On 2/16/2014 6:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. Well, based on what I know.. the guy should be locked up for life... Of course I/we know from the coverage about his letters and such, the Jury never heard that.. What *you* know? What do you know? At least as much as you, and you've found him guilty. Oh. There was a hidden shooter somewhere, eh? I doubt it. |
Pocket Holster for P938
On 2/16/2014 9:25 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:24:26 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 6:57 PM, KC wrote: On 2/16/2014 6:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote: BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be 'bad Republican jury', eh? He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been. You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt. Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him convicted for the crime he committed: murder. Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors planned on a new trial on the murder charge. Yes, and yes. But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen. I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend) testimony that basically contradicted much of his. It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense. But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his statements. Well, based on what I know.. the guy should be locked up for life... Of course I/we know from the coverage about his letters and such, the Jury never heard that.. What *you* know? What do you know? What I have seen and heard on TV. That's why I said "based on what I know" genius... Thought you were some kind of English hero?? At least as much as you, and you've found him guilty. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com