Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 1/26/2014 9:39 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/26/2014 4:42 PM, Wayne.B wrote: A video clip of Steve Jobs introducing the Macintosh in 1984: http://venturebeat.com/2014/01/26/check-out-steve-jobs-demo-the-mac-for-the-first-time-in-1984-video/ The Mac was a very cool computer and way ahead of its time. I had the use of one at the office back around 1985 or so. The graphics and laser printer were just great. That was interesting. It also struck me how much Macintosh has evolved into becoming more like a PC running Windows over the years. Back when they had 68000 processors we used them to develop software for 68000 based communicaitons devices. The first serious 68000 based computer system I became familiar with was a HP 9836 with extended I/O rack back in the mid 1980s. We used it to attempt to automate the control of thin film deposition in a vacuum chamber based on optically monitoring the changes in the index of refraction of the deposited films. The HP 9836 had to compute a Fourier transform curve fitting algorithm in real time. How's that for being "nerdy"? :-) HP should have stuck with the test tools, test automation and printers. Their computers were never really good general purpose systems and their attempt to bolster their street cred in the PC area by buying Compaq, which had bought DEC, did do anything to help their bottome line. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2014 8:22 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 1/26/2014 9:39 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/26/2014 4:42 PM, Wayne.B wrote: A video clip of Steve Jobs introducing the Macintosh in 1984: http://venturebeat.com/2014/01/26/check-out-steve-jobs-demo-the-mac-for-the-first-time-in-1984-video/ The Mac was a very cool computer and way ahead of its time. I had the use of one at the office back around 1985 or so. The graphics and laser printer were just great. That was interesting. It also struck me how much Macintosh has evolved into becoming more like a PC running Windows over the years. Back when they had 68000 processors we used them to develop software for 68000 based communicaitons devices. The first serious 68000 based computer system I became familiar with was a HP 9836 with extended I/O rack back in the mid 1980s. We used it to attempt to automate the control of thin film deposition in a vacuum chamber based on optically monitoring the changes in the index of refraction of the deposited films. The HP 9836 had to compute a Fourier transform curve fitting algorithm in real time. How's that for being "nerdy"? :-) HP should have stuck with the test tools, test automation and printers. Their computers were never really good general purpose systems and their attempt to bolster their street cred in the PC area by buying Compaq, which had bought DEC, did do anything to help their bottome line. The HP 9836 was definitely not designed for the consumer market. I remember that the computer and the I/O that we needed was about $16,000 or more back in 1985. I had a pirated copy of the early, first release of Flight Simulator (it was on a 5.25" floppy) and used to play around with it. The "airplane" was simply a off-centered cross. I've had very good luck with the HP Pavilian series laptops, one Vista, one Win 7. I suppose now that I said that this one will freeze up and die. I've had it since 2009 and used it extensively everyday at the guitar shop until about a year ago when I brought it home. I keep the Win 7 in reserve and am also getting familiar with the iMac. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2014 9:58 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... I've had very good luck with the HP Pavilian series laptops, one Vista, one Win 7. I suppose now that I said that this one will freeze up and die. I've had it since 2009 and used it extensively everyday at the guitar shop until about a year ago when I brought it home. I keep the Win 7 in reserve and am also getting familiar with the iMac. Anything an Apple product does better than a Windows based product? Seems to me the only reason for Apple is the "precious" factor. I'm a gamer, so I never considered one. They are slim and stylish. What more could you ask for? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/14, 9:58 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... I've had very good luck with the HP Pavilian series laptops, one Vista, one Win 7. I suppose now that I said that this one will freeze up and die. I've had it since 2009 and used it extensively everyday at the guitar shop until about a year ago when I brought it home. I keep the Win 7 in reserve and am also getting familiar with the iMac. Anything an Apple product does better than a Windows based product? Seems to me the only reason for Apple is the "precious" factor. I'm a gamer, so I never considered one. I think the media applications work better and slicker on the Mac computers than on the Windoze computers. I also think that much of the software common to both vehicles, such as Firefox, Thunderbird, and many others, works more robustly on the Macs. The Windoze office suite seems the same on both vehicles to me, and WORD is just as annoying on Macs as it is on Windoze machines. ![]() To me, Macs and the stuff that runs on them are easier to customize, and the real estate in the OSX directories is easier to find. And there's no damned Windoze registry. From what I have seen, there are a zillion more games available for Windoze machines than Mac machines. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:21:04 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/27/14, 9:58 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... I've had very good luck with the HP Pavilian series laptops, one Vista, one Win 7. I suppose now that I said that this one will freeze up and die. I've had it since 2009 and used it extensively everyday at the guitar shop until about a year ago when I brought it home. I keep the Win 7 in reserve and am also getting familiar with the iMac. Anything an Apple product does better than a Windows based product? Seems to me the only reason for Apple is the "precious" factor. I'm a gamer, so I never considered one. I think the media applications work better and slicker on the Mac computers than on the Windoze computers. I also think that much of the software common to both vehicles, such as Firefox, Thunderbird, and many others, works more robustly on the Macs. The Windoze office suite seems the same on both vehicles to me, and WORD is just as annoying on Macs as it is on Windoze machines. ![]() What do you mean by 'robust'. I've run Firefox, IE, and Chrome on this old XP, and find all of them very 'robust' - if you mean fast. To me, Macs and the stuff that runs on them are easier to customize, and the real estate in the OSX directories is easier to find. And there's no damned Windoze registry. From what I have seen, there are a zillion more games available for Windoze machines than Mac machines. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2014 9:58 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... I've had very good luck with the HP Pavilian series laptops, one Vista, one Win 7. I suppose now that I said that this one will freeze up and die. I've had it since 2009 and used it extensively everyday at the guitar shop until about a year ago when I brought it home. I keep the Win 7 in reserve and am also getting familiar with the iMac. Anything an Apple product does better than a Windows based product? Seems to me the only reason for Apple is the "precious" factor. I'm a gamer, so I never considered one. The display on the new iMac is nice, although I wish there was a way to turn down the overall color drive. There's a display "calibrations" procedure that I've done but it doesn't allow you to simply turn down the color. Some websites, like Yahoo's homepage, is just way too overly saturated, color-wise. Other than that, I'd say the iMac is well built but so far does not offer any special features or capabilities that I can't do on a Windows machine. I use the Windows laptop 90 percent of the time and use the iMac only for off-line stuff like my mini recording studio. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/14, 10:22 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/27/2014 9:58 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... I've had very good luck with the HP Pavilian series laptops, one Vista, one Win 7. I suppose now that I said that this one will freeze up and die. I've had it since 2009 and used it extensively everyday at the guitar shop until about a year ago when I brought it home. I keep the Win 7 in reserve and am also getting familiar with the iMac. Anything an Apple product does better than a Windows based product? Seems to me the only reason for Apple is the "precious" factor. I'm a gamer, so I never considered one. The display on the new iMac is nice, although I wish there was a way to turn down the overall color drive. There's a display "calibrations" procedure that I've done but it doesn't allow you to simply turn down the color. Some websites, like Yahoo's homepage, is just way too overly saturated, color-wise. Other than that, I'd say the iMac is well built but so far does not offer any special features or capabilities that I can't do on a Windows machine. I use the Windows laptop 90 percent of the time and use the iMac only for off-line stuff like my mini recording studio. You couldn't find a setting you liked in Calibration Assistant or whatever it is called under preferences, display, color? I did that once a few years ago and toned everything down a tad. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For dog lovers and automation lovers... | General | |||
Apple Prepares to Crush Apple Store Unions | General | |||
For the gun lovers | General | |||
yo: Tom & dog lovers everywhere | General | |||
Hog lovers..... | General |