Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default "0" Pirating last year?

On Friday, January 10, 2014 11:38:21 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."


wrote:




On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:


On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:




On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:




On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
















A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...
















Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.








Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"












The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can




stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit




them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you




with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the




bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....




The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it


can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.




===




It seems to work for the Coast Guard.




Lots of countries have anti gun laws.


That's why you arm up in int'l water.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default "0" Pirating last year?

Tim wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 11:38:21 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."


wrote:




On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:


On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:




On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:




On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
















A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...
















Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.








Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"












The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can




stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit




them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you




with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the




bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....




The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it


can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.




===




It seems to work for the Coast Guard.




Lots of countries have anti gun laws.


That's why you arm up in int'l water.


The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma
deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters
and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default "0" Pirating last year?

On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:



That's why you arm up in int'l water.




The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.


That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default "0" Pirating last year?

On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:



That's why you arm up in int'l water.




The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.


That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit.


But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being
pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to
protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going
to happen?
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Default "0" Pirating last year?

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:27:56 -0500, KC wrote:

On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:



That's why you arm up in int'l water.



The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.


That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit.


But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being
pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to
protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going
to happen?


Shippers would have a choice of buying or not buying the insurance.
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2014
Posts: 672
Default "0" Pirating last year?

On 1/11/2014 11:27 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:



That's why you arm up in int'l water.



The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is
a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international
waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.


That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that
boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then
before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for
return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended
period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of
money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs
far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would
get life figured out and quit.


But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being
pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to
protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going
to happen?


Same reasoning could be applied to concealed carry, but concealed carry
seems to be working.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zimmerman's lawyers quit, claim former client "erratic," and "shaky." X ` Man[_3_] General 0 April 11th 12 01:02 AM
" Butt Plug Junior" Ingersoll...rec boats latest "stalker " *e#c General 1 February 6th 11 06:43 PM
Would Sotomayor Exonerate Bill Richardson & His "Moving AmericaForward" "Latino Voter Registration" Scam? [email protected] General 1 June 5th 09 07:44 PM
Coelan...10 year plus "varnish" idm28 Boat Building 2 May 15th 07 02:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017