About Us

Califbill

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/29/13, 2:57 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/29/13, 1:37 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/29/13, 12:44 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 07:25:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You mean through private health insurance? Well, the regressive
governors and legislatures in some states have taken care of that for
the pushy religious. Seems reasonable that if I don't want my insurance
premiums to pay for cancer treatments for smokers, why, smokers should
be S.O.L. when they need surgery or chemo or whatever, right? Right?

D'oh.

So you would also deny treatment of gallstones, type 2 diabetes, high
blood pressure, high cholesterol and triglycerides, coronary artery
disease (CAD), a stroke, and sleep apnea for fat people?

Nobody held them down and shoved that pie in their mouth.

I was being sarcastic, Gregg-ster. You didn't see the "right. Right?" I
would hope you would have realized that.

No, I wouldn't deny coverage for anything on your little list, nor would
I deny coverage for abortion. And of course, I also wouldn't allow anyone
to exclude themselves from getting coverage. Universal health care
coverage for *all* and if we have to pay for it by selling a few aircraft
carriers or nuclear submarines or F35s, so be it.

Bull**** on the being sarcastic. You actually believe this ****. I would
much more support birth control supplies being paid for by the government.
Something is really wrong with society, when almost 50% of births are out
of wedlock and welfare is paying for more than 50% of those kids. When you
get more money for more kids, and we are on 6+ generations of welfare
families!

Indeed, Bilious, I do believe in mandatory universal health care
coverage, and I don't believe the conditions mentioned should be excluded from coverage.

I also believe we should cut back drastically on military spending, with
the goal of reducing it by at least 50% over the next decade.

I agree somewhat. But what we have now is only universal healthcare for
abortions. And most of my post was ignored, and only Harry's specified
posits were posted by FOAD.

Perhaps if you knew what a posit was, and who FOAD and Harry were, you'd
appear to have a higher IQ than you present.

I know FOAD and Harry are idiots. Bragging on 2 (maybe) liberal arts
degrees. Sort of a continuation of high school.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A T'giving chuckle	Don White	General	0	November 24th 05 05:06 PM
Chuckle of the Day	Harry.Krause	General	0	June 5th 05 06:46 PM
Chuckle for a few ...	Eisboch	General	115	November 8th 04 07:58 PM

Menu

About Us