Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A third letter from Cambodia
From: Robert Mellis
Subject: Vietnam Follies The big guys from New York descended upon our fair city. We sat with the American Ambassador, listened to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, and heard the Rector of the Royal University of Phnom Penh. We took them up the Mekong to visit the silk-weaving ladies in their houses without electricity. We wined them and dined them. Then we brought them to the Center to meet the Cambodian graduates. Old Jimmy Greenfield, the president, was overwhelmed to see those bright shining faces - 35 of them - at lunch. We then sat down privately and he told me he wanted to close down the Southeast Asia Media Center because it cost too much. How soon could I shut it down? Well, well, well. This was a little out of the blue. He told me he has decided Cambodia is not ready for us. He wants to focus on Vietnam. Okay. There is no question that Vietnam is the country with all the economic energy, intellectual energy, and best education in the region. But it also is the country with the greatest need to control thoughts and actions. So we boarded the big bird and flew to Ho Chi Minh City and we wined and dined again - this time with the Vietnamese graduates, as well as top editors from Saigon Times, The Labourer Newspaper, the new computer magazine that's about to begin. HCM is an incredible place. Six million - maybe seven million - people live there. It's noisy, raucous, the economic engine that drive the country. There's money being made and being spent here. The women are breath-takingly beautiful in their silk ao-dai pant dresses. This spectacular dress, I decided after making a laborious study of the subject, simply makes plain women more beautiful. The top is form-fitting, but it floats freely from the waist down. It covers silk-satin long pants. The ladies climb aboard their motorbikes (four million in the city) and tuck their silks under and around them and head out into the street. They are just everywhere; it's the dress code of HCM City. Nice dress code. We then moved up-country to Hanoi. The top brass were booked into the Metropole, a 5-star hotel. Jo and I and the two instructors for a course we held were ensconced at the Army Guest House. We awoke each morning to reveille; I never could discover if it was a tape recording or if we had a genuine bugler. The help seemed to be Army personnel... a little morose, not too interested in serving their public. But the price was right. I had arranged a dinner with Tran Ve, the editor in chief of Vietnam Economic News. I'd provided a workshop in December to his HCM City staff of reporters and editors and he was most appreciative. I had helped his managing editor fill out an application for a Knight Fellow to come and provide him with two or three months of fulltime mentoring and assistance. When Jimmy Greenfield, the president of our foundation, discovered I had done this, he became quite petulant. He recently had been asked to resign from the Knight Fellowship board because of the conflict of interest that occurred when he would decide who would make a good Knight Fellow for his different centers. In a shocking display of bad manners he announced in a loud voice, with Tran Ve sitting immediately to his right, "Let's get out of here. I don't want to waste time duplicating assistance if these people are getting a Knight Fellow." I almost fell out of my seat. It was hard to even understand what brought on this embarrassing incident. I signaled him that the magazine had heard nothing about whether or not they were getting a trainer. Besides, we could work alongside another trainer. He settled down. The next day, however, just as we were about to have lunch with the Hanoi graduates, Jimmy Greenfield, 80 years old and maybe just on the far side of rational thinking, called me over and told me he had decided he wanted nothing to do with Knight Fellows. Since we are currently supporting a Knight Fellow at the Center I told him I just didn't get it. "Well, you'd better get it," he said in a threatening voice. I don't do well when I'm faced with a bully. I looked him in the eye and said I thought his comment made no sense. But that only made him angrier. "You either get it or you rethink why you are working for me," he said. Since I feel I am putting a fair amount of psychic and emotional energy into running the center I told him I was rethinking my role as we stood there. I couldn't imagine why I would want to work with such a person. But this old warhorse from the New York Times (he'd been the foreign editor, the editor of the Times magazine, assistant managing editor) is used to having things done his way. I stepped away and sat with the students and tried to enjoy their company. But I felt a line had been crossed. Jo and I discussed the unfolding situation. She is having a difficult time with the rug being pulled out with the impending closure of the center. This new development left us wondering if there was even much point in continuing. The whole American team met with Madame Binh to discuss ways to cooperate and develop our training in Hanoi. She was cautious and polite, as expected. She wants me back in the country to discuss her needs and ways we can work together. I find I have great respect for this careful, bright woman. The New Yorkers wanted to push her into a one-year commitment and she was having none of it. "I understand this would be more efficient," she said through a translator. "But I must have time to think about the process." A night's sleep resulted in a new equilibrium and we pressed on. A visit with Phnom Penh friends to Hanoi helped ease our tension. We had a fabulous dinner at a restaurant named Le Tonkin. We took another deep breath and met with the powers that be the next morning. The petulance and egocentric decision-making had subsided. We talked about tactics. Then they flew off to Myanmar. I did a workshop at Vietnam Investment Review on Monday and Tuesday morning. Twenty eager faces greeted me. With a bust of Ho Chi Minh for my backdrop, we discussed, point by point, the weaknesses in their stories. I was told how some things are too sensitive to explain. I spent much time pushing them to expand their boundaries, to reduce their self-censorship. I found when I provided them with specific wording for ways to push that envelope they eagerly embraced the idea. In the evening (Monday), we taxied over to Le Rendezvous cafe where you slip into a cocoon of classical music and enjoy the show of having an Irish coffee prepared at our table with such showmanship that the restaurant stops and applauds the waiter. The wrap-up day found me back at Vietnam News Agency, the party-controlled news-gathering apparatus. I found Mme. Binh had clearly checked with the powers that be and she handed me everything I sought: four workshops during 2004, a visit by me in June so I can work with selected editors who wish to redesign their publications, a workshop by Michelle Foster in late May and early June on business management techniques. Not a bad day's work. There's a new picture folder, April in Vietnam in the Jorob2004 site. Also, pictures of Jo at her opening. Enjoy ===== Cambodia pictures are at: http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/jorob2004/my_photos http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/margaretjmellis Sailing and other travel pictures are at: http://photos.yahoo.com/robertsmellis |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
a second letter from cambodia | General | |||
A letter from Cambodia | General | |||
An off topic Letter from a Soldier | General | |||
This is INCREDIBLE!! | Electronics | |||
An Open Letter to John F. Kerry | General |