On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:39:00 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 11/7/13, 8:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/7/2013 8:14 AM, John H wrote:
It didn't take them long! Wonder if Krause has changed his opinion of
Christie given the latest
Democrat ploys.

http://tinyurl.com/oq24y74

or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democrats-begin-effort-to-negatively-define-chris-christie-before-2016-campaign/2013/11/06/780e4420-4720-11e3-bf0c-cebf37c6f484_story.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!





I noticed that last night while browsing through the various cable
network shows, MSNBC in particular. Big Ed was on a roll as were
Maddow and O'Donnell.

It's as if the DNC issues them scripts and talking points.

Harry is probably on the mailing list.



Apparently GOP Good Buddy Rubio and several others are "minimizing" the
impact of Christie's landslide victory:

Washington (CNN) – In an interview with CNN, Republican Sen. Marco Rubio
downplayed Wednesday any national takeaways from GOP Gov. Chris
Christie's crushing victory in the blue state of New Jersey and
Republican Ken Cuccinelli's loss in Virginia, saying what happened in
Tuesday's elections carry little implications for the future of the GOP.

"I think we need to understand that some of these races don't apply to
future races. Every race is different–it has a different set of
factors–but I congratulate (Christie) on his win," he told CNN Chief
Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash.


I've never been a fan of the Big Blowhard from Jersey. He sure as hell
isn't doing anything to improve the quality of life of ordinary people
in his state, and there are still huge areas untouched by repairs after
Hurricane Sandy, with citizens wondering why their governor talks the
talk but doesn't walk the walk.

I don't see Christie doing well in the GOP primary process, but you
never know. The Republicans are going to pick one of the Teabagger Boys.

Your 180 is noted.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

On 11/7/13, 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:13:10 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

What I've heard is that there are funds in Jersey now available for
rebuilding but Christie is not releasing them.

I don't know about that. It will be interesting what Chris has to say
about it. It does seem to be the story de jour since I have heard it
3-4 times in the last 24 hours in different places.


I'm still looking for a list of real accomplishments Christie has
provided for average New Joiseyians, accomplishments that make life
better for average citizens.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

On Thursday, November 7, 2013 8:07:50 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:


"Also, serious presidential candidates usually release health
information about themselves. "

They usually provide legitimate birth certificates on demand, too.

LOL!

On 11/8/13, 8:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 8:07:50 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:


"Also, serious presidential candidates usually release health
information about themselves. "

They usually provide legitimate birth certificates on demand, too.

LOL!



Today's laugh comes from Rick Perry, who, when asked by Chuck Todd
whether the rate of high school graduation in Texas would hurt the state
(Texas ranks 49th), responded, "We're third in high school graduation."


--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:48:27 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 11/8/13, 8:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 8:07:50 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:


"Also, serious presidential candidates usually release health
information about themselves. "

They usually provide legitimate birth certificates on demand, too.

LOL!



Today's laugh comes from Rick Perry, who, when asked by Chuck Todd
whether the rate of high school graduation in Texas would hurt the state
(Texas ranks 49th), responded, "We're third in high school graduation."

Where did you see the 49th number?
How far back did you set the way back machine Sherman?
I see numbers in the mid 20s on objective comparisons but it really
gets down to how you define "high school graduate"
On one extreme it is only a kid who graduated from a unionized public
school in 4 years (9-12)
The other extreme includes guys who get GEDs in prison but I don't see
any that put Texas at #49.

You and Perry are both cooking the books to get your numbers

Yeah, this seems to tell the story, and it doesn't look that bleak:

http://tinyurl.com/nw2xawy

On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:54:07 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:48:27 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 11/8/13, 8:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 8:07:50 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:


"Also, serious presidential candidates usually release health
information about themselves. "

They usually provide legitimate birth certificates on demand, too.

LOL!



Today's laugh comes from Rick Perry, who, when asked by Chuck Todd
whether the rate of high school graduation in Texas would hurt the state
(Texas ranks 49th), responded, "We're third in high school graduation."

Where did you see the 49th number?
How far back did you set the way back machine Sherman?
I see numbers in the mid 20s on objective comparisons but it really
gets down to how you define "high school graduate"
On one extreme it is only a kid who graduated from a unionized public
school in 4 years (9-12)
The other extreme includes guys who get GEDs in prison but I don't see
any that put Texas at #49.

You and Perry are both cooking the books to get your numbers

NO! I can't believe you could accuse the Krausemeister of 'cooking the books'. He'd never stoop to
anything less than total honesty.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Tim wrote:
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 8:07:50 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:


"Also, serious presidential candidates usually release health
information about themselves. "

They usually provide legitimate birth certificates on demand, too.

LOL!

And do not hide their academic records.

In article , says...

On 11/7/2013 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/7/13, 8:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/7/2013 8:14 AM, John H wrote:
It didn't take them long! Wonder if Krause has changed his opinion of
Christie given the latest
Democrat ploys.

http://tinyurl.com/oq24y74

or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democrats-begin-effort-to-negatively-define-chris-christie-before-2016-campaign/2013/11/06/780e4420-4720-11e3-bf0c-cebf37c6f484_story.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads



John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!





I noticed that last night while browsing through the various cable
network shows, MSNBC in particular. Big Ed was on a roll as were
Maddow and O'Donnell.

It's as if the DNC issues them scripts and talking points.

Harry is probably on the mailing list.



Apparently GOP Good Buddy Rubio and several others are "minimizing" the
impact of Christie's landslide victory:

Washington (CNN) ? In an interview with CNN, Republican Sen. Marco Rubio
downplayed Wednesday any national takeaways from GOP Gov. Chris
Christie's crushing victory in the blue state of New Jersey and
Republican Ken Cuccinelli's loss in Virginia, saying what happened in
Tuesday's elections carry little implications for the future of the GOP.

"I think we need to understand that some of these races don't apply to
future races. Every race is different?it has a different set of
factors?but I congratulate (Christie) on his win," he told CNN Chief
Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash.


I've never been a fan of the Big Blowhard from Jersey. He sure as hell
isn't doing anything to improve the quality of life of ordinary people
in his state, and there are still huge areas untouched by repairs after
Hurricane Sandy, with citizens wondering why their governor talks the
talk but doesn't walk the walk.

I don't see Christie doing well in the GOP primary process, but you
never know. The Republicans are going to pick one of the Teabagger Boys.




Well, the one claim being made that disturbs me is that he is "sitting
on" about two thirds of federal aid earmarked for Sandy victims. If
true, he has a lot of explaining to do.

Prior to his emergence into the spotlight (well, more of a floodlight)
I knew nothing about him. I got a kick out of his no-nonsense style
initially but I am not quite ready to call him a candidate of choice
yet. Need to hear more.

Christie has too many skeletons in his closet and the DNC knows about all of them.

BAR wrote:



Christie has too many skeletons in his closet and the DNC knows about all of them.

So does Hillary and the RNC knows about all of them.

Maybe Sarah Palin isn't a bad idea after all. She'd certainly have our
adversaries concerned, trying to figure out what that crazy woman is
thinking. Her staff could just keep running the video of her being
interviewed while a guy in the background is stuffing live turkeys into
a grinder to chop their heads off.

On 11/9/13, 4:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

BAR wrote:



Christie has too many skeletons in his closet and the DNC knows about
all of them.

So does Hillary and the RNC knows about all of them.

Maybe Sarah Palin isn't a bad idea after all. She'd certainly have our
adversaries concerned, trying to figure out what that crazy woman is
thinking. Her staff could just keep running the video of her being
interviewed while a guy in the background is stuffing live turkeys into
a grinder to chop their heads off.








Palin and Cruz. What could possibly go wrong.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.