![]() |
McCauliffe projected winner...
On 11/6/13, 8:09 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2013 8:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/6/13, 7:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/6/2013 5:51 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/6/13, 5:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/6/2013 5:34 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/6/13, 4:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: If nothing else, you'd have to agree that in his "retirement", GW Bush has conducted himself with dignity and has shown respect for the trials and tribulations of the current president. I think Bush has been decent in his retirement. It's amazing to me he's done virtually nothing since leaving office. You should be grateful. Many think he has done quite enough. It's his intellectual laziness, I think. All the living former presidents and Gerry Ford and Ronald Reagan were active and involved citizens. Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Clinton are all visible and active. Some people love the limelight and interacting with others. (Bill Clinton is a perfect example.) Some don't. You make it sound like people have some sort of obligation to spend their retirement in a manner that is acceptable or approved by you. They don't. :) You're really working overtime here to rehab poor misunderstood Dubya. Love it. It's a dirty job but someone has to do it. I think you are overequipped intellectually for the job. You need to start up a new business. :) -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
McCauliffe projected winner...
On 11/6/2013 8:09 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/6/2013 8:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/6/13, 7:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/6/2013 5:51 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/6/13, 5:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/6/2013 5:34 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/6/13, 4:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: If nothing else, you'd have to agree that in his "retirement", GW Bush has conducted himself with dignity and has shown respect for the trials and tribulations of the current president. I think Bush has been decent in his retirement. It's amazing to me he's done virtually nothing since leaving office. You should be grateful. Many think he has done quite enough. It's his intellectual laziness, I think. All the living former presidents and Gerry Ford and Ronald Reagan were active and involved citizens. Carter, George H.W. Bush, and Clinton are all visible and active. Some people love the limelight and interacting with others. (Bill Clinton is a perfect example.) Some don't. You make it sound like people have some sort of obligation to spend their retirement in a manner that is acceptable or approved by you. They don't. :) You're really working overtime here to rehab poor misunderstood Dubya. Love it. It's a dirty job but someone has to do it. I should point out that I have no particular affinity for GW Bush. I just think he has received a raw deal by some on the left with accusations for deeds for which there is no proof, only "accusations" and assumptions. I think he did his best as he saw it to protect the country after 9/11. I also think events that occurred during his terms as POTUS still weigh heavily on his mind. |
McCauliffe projected winner...
On 11/6/2013 8:19 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/6/13, 8:09 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: It's a dirty job but someone has to do it. I think you are overequipped intellectually for the job. You need to start up a new business. :) Heh. 15, 20 years ago, no problem. Now-a-days? Forget about it. Too many rules, regulations, reports and other requirements totally unrelated to what your core business requirements are. The business I started back in 1989 initially had three employees (including me) and a part time accountant. Over time it grew but it was because I was able to focus on the technology, not on a bunch of unrelated, non productive issues. I was happy to sell it when it got to the point where I could no longer do what I did best ... or at least enjoyed the most. To start up the same business today I'd need to start out with a cast of thousands and a healthy line of financing. No thanks. Things have changed a lot. Details, but time consuming and have costs associated with them. I don't envy those trying to get a start-up going today. |
McCauliffe projected winner...
On 11/7/2013 8:16 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:32:51 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/6/13, 4:14 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/6/2013 3:16 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Don't get me wrong...I am enjoying your efforts to resuscitate the reputation of George W. Bush, the worst president in the memory of anyone living. :) Given your expressed disdain for the cultures of many parts of the country (basically anything south or west of Maryland) your general background and experiences and admiration for the halls of academia, I can understand completely why GW Bush could never appeal to you. I suspect some residual resentment would exist even if he were a Democrat. George W. Bush was born in the same hospital I was, and he prepped and attended colleges in New England. He's no more a Texan than I am. Oh, and I made GOTV phone calls for his grandfather, Prescott, who was a U.S. Senator from Connecticut. I got my B.A. degree west of Maryland, and lived in Kansas, Missouri, West Virginia, Michigan, New York and Virginia, and later in Florida and Maryland. I had great times out west and in West Virginia, all places west of Maryland. There goes your theory alleging my disdain for the cultures of many parts of the country. I admit to not liking the culture of Texas, where I encountered my first "Whites Only" drinking fountains, and Mississippi and the rest of the segregated south. The first time I was shot at it was in Mississippi, and by a typical bunch of white racists. I even knew the name of the guy who did the shooting, but that's another story. George W. Bush was a terrible governor and a worse president. That he won election only speaks to the culture and intellect of those who voted for him. I have no idea what sort of president Gore might have made, had the Supremes not stolen the election for him. You're our hero, Krause. There are folks here who absolutely adore you. I can think of two. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! He got his education west of Maryland. Snerk. That would be cow flap Kansas; the home of some of the country's finest institutes of learning. -- "The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. Leadership means that, 'the buck stops here.' America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better." BHO (From 2006,when he sometimes told the truth) |
McCauliffe projected winner...
|
McCauliffe projected winner...
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:32:51 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/6/13, 4:14 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/6/2013 3:16 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Don't get me wrong...I am enjoying your efforts to resuscitate the reputation of George W. Bush, the worst president in the memory of anyone living. :) Given your expressed disdain for the cultures of many parts of the country (basically anything south or west of Maryland) your general background and experiences and admiration for the halls of academia, I can understand completely why GW Bush could never appeal to you. I suspect some residual resentment would exist even if he were a Democrat. George W. Bush was born in the same hospital I was, and he prepped and attended colleges in New England. He's no more a Texan than I am. Oh, and I made GOTV phone calls for his grandfather, Prescott, who was a U.S. Senator from Connecticut. I got my B.A. degree west of Maryland, and lived in Kansas, Missouri, West Virginia, Michigan, New York and Virginia, and later in Florida and Maryland. I had great times out west and in West Virginia, all places west of Maryland. There goes your theory alleging my disdain for the cultures of many parts of the country. I admit to not liking the culture of Texas, where I encountered my first "Whites Only" drinking fountains, and Mississippi and the rest of the segregated south. The first time I was shot at it was in Mississippi, and by a typical bunch of white racists. I even knew the name of the guy who did the shooting, but that's another story. George W. Bush was a terrible governor and a worse president. That he won election only speaks to the culture and intellect of those who voted for him. I have no idea what sort of president Gore might have made, had the Supremes not stolen the election for him. You're our hero, Krause. There are folks here who absolutely adore you. I can think of two. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
McCauliffe projected winner...
On 11/7/2013 7:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
On 11/6/13, 9:37 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Mother Jones?" Aw, come on. You can do better than that. MOTHER JONES MAGAZINE (MJM) 222 Sutter St. - Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94108 URL :http://www.motherjones.com Magazine named for socialist labor organizer Mary Harris "Mother" Jones Does investigative reporting that mostly targets corporations, capitalists, private property, and Republican officeholders On second thought ... don't bother. Not interested in getting into a five day debate. Please show me what in the article is wrong. You are pulling a Scotty now, negating the source but saying NOTHING of the facts in the article. I've stated my beliefs based upon two official (and lawful) Congressional investigations. The opinions written in liberal op-eds, anti-war blogs, and left leaning magazines are noteworthy but are based upon conjecture, speculation and theory and serve no legal purpose in terms of enforcing any laws. If it makes you feel good to recite the mantra, "Bush lied us into war", go for it. Not interested in a week's worth of bouncing ball BS with you. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com