In article ,
says...

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Do you have a TV? It has been covered extensively for a couple weeks

I'm sorry, I've seen NOTHING that says the website will be a trillion
dollar spending function. Could you point that out to me, please?

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:19:55 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:37:40 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Do you have a TV? It has been covered extensively for a couple weeks

I'm sorry, I've seen NOTHING that says the website will be a trillion
dollar spending function. Could you point that out to me, please?

I was referring to the $350M for the site.

The $1T is conjecture at this point but it is clear that this will be
a lot more expensive that it was sold as being.
Unlike Medicare, that actually financed itself for over 35 years
before going into the red , this program will hit the ground losing
money.

"The ACA will be budget neutral."

"If you like your current insurance plan, you can keep it. Period."

How many more lies will unfold?


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:37:40 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Do you have a TV? It has been covered extensively for a couple weeks

I'm sorry, I've seen NOTHING that says the website will be a trillion
dollar spending function. Could you point that out to me, please?

I was referring to the $350M for the site.

The $1T is conjecture at this point but it is clear that this will be
a lot more expensive that it was sold as being.
Unlike Medicare, that actually financed itself for over 35 years
before going into the red , this program will hit the ground losing
money.

MediCare was only going to cost $500 million when it was proposed. Look
how that has worked out.

On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 2:41:14 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be

a Republican....

Flagged for the **** it is.

On 10/30/2013 1:41 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Ya, why did we pay those federal workers for not working.
Mikek

In article , says...

about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Problem is it is a $700 million website that should have cost no more than $70 million
dollars to develop.