![]() |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article , says...
On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? More than allowed. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article 1774692616404424212.060840bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? More than allowed. Cite? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ....from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/26/2013 11:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? No, this is what he said "Wristbone". "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. When was the last time Chicago voted Republican? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com