|
Pretty big news for Virginia...
The Loudoun Times Mirror typically endorses GOP candidates...
The Times-Mirror endorses McAuliffe for governor Wednesday, Oct. 23 | 0 comments The radically conservative nature of the Republican ticket this year leads us to favor the Democrats for statewide office, Terry McAuliffe for governor, Ralph Northam for lieutenant governor and Mark Herring for attorney general. There has been reticence by many given the choice for governor this year. Even so, you vote for the choices you have in front of you. We endorse Terry McAuliffe for governor. Having prospered for four years under the pro-business focus of Gov. Bob McDonnell, McAuliffe’s hyper-focus on economic issues is one we’re comfortable with. His push for expanding resources at the community college system is one to be lauded and he has taken a solid, reasonable approach on the issues of the day. The criticism laid against McAuliffe has landed largely on his reputation as a salesman and deal-maker. Ranked among the best states for business, we must continue attracting large businesses to the commonwealth. To do that, the state needs a governor who is comfortable in a corporate boardroom pitching the virtues of the Old Dominion. Virginia needs someone like McAuliffe to be a salesman for the commonwealth. Whether or not his overtures will be accepted, he is also a man likely to extend a hand on bipartisan compromise. For those concerned with his lack of legislative experience, we point to the success of Sen. Mark Warner, who likewise was without experience as an elected official before his term as governor. Ken Cuccinelli is a man of strong principles and conservative values. However, despite his final stretch attempt to recast himself as devoted to job growth and economic recovery, his tenure as attorney general demonstrates that he cannot resist placing his own ideological concerns above the business of governing. Whether it’s conducting an independent investigation into climate change research, attempting to limit nondiscrimination policies for gays and lesbians at colleges and universities or his continued push to limit women’s options on abortion, Cuccinelli cannot divorce himself from social issues and an economic platform of lowering taxes without specified budget cuts is suspect. His tendency toward the crusade du jour makes him ill equipped to serve as a mediator between political parties, an Achilles heel shared by far too many of our public officials today. The choice for lieutenant governor appears easy. Ralph Northam is an experienced legislator with a level demeanor and a desire to reach across the aisle to improve the commonwealth. His experience in the Virginia Senate should prove invaluable upon inheriting an evenly divided body. A pediatric neurologist by trade, we’re eager to see his contribution to future debates on health care and Medicaid expansion. Alternatively, to call the campaign of E.W. Jackson disappointing would be an understatement. Accusing his opponent of making the race all about social issues, Jackson has continued to stand behind an ever-expanding string of extremist comments. He appears more interested in finding a podium to speak his mind than an opportunity to serve. For attorney general, we choose Mark Herring. We’ve watched Herring’s work as state senator representing Loudoun and Fairfax. He has fought to protect the elderly from financial abuse, supported the region on transportation issues and worked across party lines for his constituents. More important, Herring cares deeply about each and every issue he espouses and understands the human cost in bad legislation and missed opportunities. Our sole regret is that should he win, Loudoun wouldn’t have Herring to represent us in the General Assembly. Mark Obenshain has a strong record on public safety legislation, but his introduction of the personhood bill gives us serious pause. It leads us to believe that an Attorney General Obenshain would be as activist as the Cuccinelli administration ending this term. http://tinyurl.com/qgqhown |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:11:27 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
Ken Cuccinelli is a man of strong principles and conservative values. However, despite his final stretch attempt to recast himself as devoted to job growth and economic recovery, his tenure as attorney general demonstrates that he cannot resist placing his own ideological concerns above the business of governing. Whether it’s conducting an independent investigation into climate change research, attempting to limit nondiscrimination policies for gays and lesbians at colleges and universities or his continued push to limit women’s options on abortion, Cuccinelli cannot divorce himself from social issues and an economic platform of lowering taxes without specified budget cuts is suspect. His tendency toward the crusade du jour makes him ill equipped to serve as a mediator between political parties, an Achilles heel shared by far too many of our public officials today. And there you have it. The GOP will have to divorce itself from the TP and, in doing so, decrement their numbers at the polls even further. They made the deal with these nincompoops and now they're living with it. Good. When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:29:38 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:11:27 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Ken Cuccinelli is a man of strong principles and conservative values. However, despite his final stretch attempt to recast himself as devoted to job growth and economic recovery, his tenure as attorney general demonstrates that he cannot resist placing his own ideological concerns above the business of governing. Whether it’s conducting an independent investigation into climate change research, attempting to limit nondiscrimination policies for gays and lesbians at colleges and universities or his continued push to limit women’s options on abortion, Cuccinelli cannot divorce himself from social issues and an economic platform of lowering taxes without specified budget cuts is suspect. His tendency toward the crusade du jour makes him ill equipped to serve as a mediator between political parties, an Achilles heel shared by far too many of our public officials today. And there you have it. The GOP will have to divorce itself from the TP and, in doing so, decrement their numbers at the polls even further. They made the deal with these nincompoops and now they're living with it. Good. When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas’ new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It’s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren’t accepted. Now ask a woman who’s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who’s been divorced — maybe more than once — where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:51:17 -0400, Gogarty wrote:
In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? Continuously and almost everywhere. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/2013 12:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:51:17 -0400, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? Continuously and almost everywhere. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You sure are narrow minded and uninformed. HOLY ****!!! YOU said that? LOL! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/13, 12:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:51:17 -0400, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? Continuously and almost everywhere. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You sure are narrow minded and uninformed. Once you recognize and internalize that Herring is a racist, just about everything "political" he posts is predictable. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/2013 12:16 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas’ new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It’s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren’t accepted. Now ask a woman who’s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who’s been divorced — maybe more than once — where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Yur little woman is a perfect example. Eh? --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:51:17 -0400, Gogarty
wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It doesn't. He knows that. Every inquiry into it reveals that there's nothing there and Rs are simply using the scare tactic as a way of suppressing the vote of likely Democratic voters. Either that, or Herring is committed to willful ignorance. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:14:07 -0400, Gogarty
wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:51:17 -0400, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? Continuously and almost everywhere. Please provide a credible citation. Don't hold breath. If anything he'll regurgitate the votes for smokes bull**** from 40 years ago. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas’ new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It’s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren’t accepted. Now ask a woman who’s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who’s been divorced — maybe more than once — where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/13, 2:18 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:51:17 -0400, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It doesn't. He knows that. Every inquiry into it reveals that there's nothing there and Rs are simply using the scare tactic as a way of suppressing the vote of likely Democratic voters. Either that, or Herring is committed to willful ignorance. Herring is your typical white male voter these days, an aging racist who will accede to anything that limits the votes of those who oppose his whitebread candidates. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas’ new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It’s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren’t accepted. Now ask a woman who’s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who’s been divorced — maybe more than once — where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article , says...
On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Good luck with that! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/24/13, 3:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Good luck with that! In Texas, apparently, women are considered second class citizens by the Republicans. Figures. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas’ new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It’s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren’t accepted. Now ask a woman who’s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who’s been divorced — maybe more than once — where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/24/13, 3:04 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Good luck with that! In Texas, apparently, women are considered second class citizens by the Republicans. Figures. How many women do not have ID? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:22:34 -0500, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas’ new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It’s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren’t accepted. Now ask a woman who’s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who’s been divorced — maybe more than once — where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? ID is also required for food stamps, welfare, extended unemployment, tax credits, and the beat goes on. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam-
, says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article , says...
On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? More than allowed. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article 1774692616404424212.060840bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? More than allowed. Cite? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ....from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/26/2013 11:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? No, this is what he said "Wristbone". "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. When was the last time Chicago voted Republican? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:27:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? Didn't you just say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article , says...
On 10/26/2013 11:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? No, this is what he said "Wristbone". "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." Wristbone??? Gee, did I ever tell anyone here that the reason I post what I post is that my wrist told me to? YOU on the other hand, have told people here that the reason you post insane, crazy lies is because of your jawbone! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article 93207581404502848.584364bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. When was the last time Chicago voted Republican? Wait, are you saying that just because the democrats won, that the republicans have never tried to rig elections??? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:27:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? Didn't you just say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! I said, and I repeat, show me how this is a democratic only thing. |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/27/2013 11:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:27:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? Didn't you just say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! I said, and I repeat, show me how this is a democratic only thing. Why, it was not his premise, it is only your deflection? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:32:41 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 93207581404502848.584364bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. When was the last time Chicago voted Republican? Wait, are you saying that just because the democrats won, that the republicans have never tried to rig elections??? Didn't you recently say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:33:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:27:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? Didn't you just say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! I said, and I repeat, show me how this is a democratic only thing. You said, "So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things??" *That* is what you said. And, you very recently said you didn't put words in other peoples' mouths. :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
In article ,
says... On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:33:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:27:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? Didn't you just say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! I said, and I repeat, show me how this is a democratic only thing. You said, "So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things??" *That* is what you said. And, you very recently said you didn't put words in other peoples' mouths. :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! That is a QUESTION. Really, can you not comprehend what you read? |
Pretty big news for Virginia...
On 10/27/2013 11:53 AM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:33:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:27:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:10:13 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 701656899404431017.820244bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/25/2013 7:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 149482182404339640.845907bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/24/13, 11:51 AM, Gogarty wrote: In article , says... When a conservative paper ditches its well-worn path, it's a bellweather for a shift in position. If the Rs continue to walk the path they're on, the Ds are going to rule for quite some time. Especially as long as they can buy votes and prohibit voter identification. Which happened where or when? It's just more right-wing bull****. The only significant voter fraud is what is being perpetrated by Republicans on groups of voters who tend not to vote for GOP candidates. The latest example is in Texas... Texas voter ID law may disenfranchise a third of female voters Texas? new voter ID law, set to go into effect on Nov. 5, requires individuals to provide a photo ID featuring their legally recognized name in order to vote. It?s well-documented that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise low-income voters, people of color, students and the elderly, but married women and transgender people (some of whom are married women) are also among those likely to be impacted by the new law. According to recent data, 34 percent of voting-age women do not have a document that currently reflects their current legal name. Among transgender women and men, the number is 41 percent. That is a lot of people who no longer meet the current requirements, and who may be hard-pressed to get a valid ID in time for the November election. Natalie Smith at Policy Mic notes: If any voter is using name different than what appears on their birth certificate, the voter is required to show proof of name change by providing an original or certified copy of their marriage license, divorce decree, or court ordered name change. Photocopies aren?t accepted. Now ask a woman who?s been married for years where her original marriage certificate is. Ask a woman who?s been divorced ? maybe more than once ? where all the divorce decrees are. Ask elderly women where their original birth certificate is. - - - Republicans are having an increasingly difficult time winning elections so where they control the legislature or governor's mansion, they change the rules to make it harder for those who support their opponents to vote. The conservative-controlled US Supreme Court of course is aiding and abetting them. No cases of significant numbers of actual voter fraud are being reported anywhere. Bull****. You have to show ID at the doctor under HIPPA laws. You have to show ID to use a credit card at times. Who does not have ID these days? Whoosh. Try reading for content, Bilious. Whoosh my ass! You have to show ID for most things these days. Why not for voting? Very important function. Look how many dead people vote in Chicago! How many? Look it up... I'm not the one who made the statement, moron. Have your jawbone look it up and get back to me. http://www.chicagonow.com/dennis-byr...active-voters/ http://www.heritage.org/research/rep...tes-in-chicago http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...stration-rolls Great, now show how this is a democratic thing. "Ironically, Democrats insist that purging the rolls of invalid registrations works in favor of Republicans, which is an implied admission that Democrats are more likely to be the offenders. As if there were fewer invalid registrations in Republican strongholds like DuPage County." ...from one of the cites you found to be 'great'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things?? Didn't you just say you don't put words in other peoples' mouths? :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! I said, and I repeat, show me how this is a democratic only thing. You said, "So in your mind, that says that Republicans don't do such things??" *That* is what you said. And, you very recently said you didn't put words in other peoples' mouths. :) John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Don't expect him to be accountable for what he says. In that respect he's just like his idol, "the chosen one". --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com