Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the
most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members
of the confederacy?

In article , says...

Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the
most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members
of the confederacy?

I would have hoped that there would be some of the North Eastern states, you know like the
one that had the original tea party would have sent at least one.

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the most
Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members of the confederacy?

Not going to be the Northeast. They love the idea of getting more money
from the Federal Treasury, than they send in!

On Sunday, October 20, 2013 7:22:19 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the

most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members

of the confederacy?

Flagged for violent, or hateful content.

**** OFF ASSHOLE

On 10/21/13, 1:36 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:22:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the
most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members
of the confederacy?

That is not really true but nice rant anyway. You have 2 tea party
reps from Maryland. (one sitting, one just left)
They have them from Illinois, Indiana, California, Iowa, New
Hampshire, Ohio and your girlfriend from Minnesota.



"most" was the key word here.

In article , says...

On 10/21/13, 1:36 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:22:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the
most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members
of the confederacy?

That is not really true but nice rant anyway. You have 2 tea party
reps from Maryland. (one sitting, one just left)
They have them from Illinois, Indiana, California, Iowa, New
Hampshire, Ohio and your girlfriend from Minnesota.



"most" was the key word here.

Always leaving yourself an escape hatch.

In article , says...

Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the
most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members
of the confederacy?

I'll tell you this, more government money bleeds into the north than the
south.

On 10/21/13, 12:21 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/21/13, 1:36 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:22:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Is it a coincidence that the states most responsible for putting the
most Tea Party representatives in the U.S. House are all former members
of the confederacy?

That is not really true but nice rant anyway. You have 2 tea party
reps from Maryland. (one sitting, one just left)
They have them from Illinois, Indiana, California, Iowa, New
Hampshire, Ohio and your girlfriend from Minnesota.



"most" was the key word here.

It is not even "most" only the ones you concentrate on.



Most of the Teabaggin' Traitors in the House come from the states of the
former traitorous confederacy.

On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:25:33 -0400, wrote:

BTW why was the confederacy "traitorous"?

Where in the constitution does it say a state can not secede?
At best the constitution is silent on that.

===

And as any good southerner can tell you, it was the north that invaded
the south.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:25:33 -0400, wrote:

BTW why was the confederacy "traitorous"?

Where in the constitution does it say a state can not secede?
At best the constitution is silent on that.

===

And as any good southerner can tell you, it was the north that invaded
the south.

Wan't known as the "War on Northern Aggression"?