Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NPR media reporter David Folkenflik writes in his forthcoming book
Murdoch's World that Fox News' public relations staffers used an elaborate series of dummy accounts to fill the comments sections of critical blog posts with pro-Fox arguments. In a chapter focusing on how Fox utilized its notoriously ruthless public relations department in the mid-to-late 00's, Folkenflik reports that Fox's PR staffers would "post pro-Fox rants" in the comments sections of "negative and even neutral" blog posts written about the network. According to Folkenflik, the staffers used various tactics to cover their tracks, including setting up wireless broadband connections that "could not be traced back" to the network. A former staffer told Folkenflik that they had personally used "one hundred" fake accounts to plant Fox-friendly commentary: On the blogs, the fight was particularly fierce. Fox PR staffers were expected to counter not just negative and even neutral blog postings but the anti-Fox comments beneath them. One former staffer recalled using twenty different aliases to post pro-Fox rants. Another had one hundred. Several employees had to acquire a cell phone thumb drive to provide a wireless broadband connection that could not be traced back to a Fox News or News Corp account. Another used an AOL dial-up connection, even in the age of widespread broadband access, on the rationale it would be harder to pinpoint its origins. Old laptops were distributed for these cyber operations. Even blogs with minor followings were reviewed to ensure no claim went unchecked. [Murdoch's World, pg. 67] In the book's endnotes, Folkenflik explains that "four former Fox News employees told me of these practices." It's unclear whether these tactics are ongoing. http://tinyurl.com/mzljlr4 What a surprise. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:03:24 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: NPR media reporter David Folkenflik writes in his forthcoming book Murdoch's World that Fox News' public relations staffers used an elaborate series of dummy accounts to fill the comments sections of critical blog posts with pro-Fox arguments. In a chapter focusing on how Fox utilized its notoriously ruthless public relations department in the mid-to-late 00's, Folkenflik reports that Fox's PR staffers would "post pro-Fox rants" in the comments sections of "negative and even neutral" blog posts written about the network. According to Folkenflik, the staffers used various tactics to cover their tracks, including setting up wireless broadband connections that "could not be traced back" to the network. A former staffer told Folkenflik that they had personally used "one hundred" fake accounts to plant Fox-friendly commentary: On the blogs, the fight was particularly fierce. Fox PR staffers were expected to counter not just negative and even neutral blog postings but the anti-Fox comments beneath them. One former staffer recalled using twenty different aliases to post pro-Fox rants. Another had one hundred. Several employees had to acquire a cell phone thumb drive to provide a wireless broadband connection that could not be traced back to a Fox News or News Corp account. Another used an AOL dial-up connection, even in the age of widespread broadband access, on the rationale it would be harder to pinpoint its origins. Old laptops were distributed for these cyber operations. Even blogs with minor followings were reviewed to ensure no claim went unchecked. [Murdoch's World, pg. 67] In the book's endnotes, Folkenflik explains that "four former Fox News employees told me of these practices." It's unclear whether these tactics are ongoing. http://tinyurl.com/mzljlr4 What a surprise. About half of the people here are anonymous too. So what? Does anyone really take things they see in blogs, BBs and forums seriously? They are just echo chambers for people who want to find other people to agree with or to argue with. Who actually reads political blogs or blogs of the self-important. Blogs are the street corners, limited and transient audience. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/20/13, 12:26 PM, wrote: On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:03:24 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: NPR media reporter David Folkenflik writes in his forthcoming book Murdoch's World that Fox News' public relations staffers used an elaborate series of dummy accounts to fill the comments sections of critical blog posts with pro-Fox arguments. In a chapter focusing on how Fox utilized its notoriously ruthless public relations department in the mid-to-late 00's, Folkenflik reports that Fox's PR staffers would "post pro-Fox rants" in the comments sections of "negative and even neutral" blog posts written about the network. According to Folkenflik, the staffers used various tactics to cover their tracks, including setting up wireless broadband connections that "could not be traced back" to the network. A former staffer told Folkenflik that they had personally used "one hundred" fake accounts to plant Fox-friendly commentary: On the blogs, the fight was particularly fierce. Fox PR staffers were expected to counter not just negative and even neutral blog postings but the anti-Fox comments beneath them. One former staffer recalled using twenty different aliases to post pro-Fox rants. Another had one hundred. Several employees had to acquire a cell phone thumb drive to provide a wireless broadband connection that could not be traced back to a Fox News or News Corp account. Another used an AOL dial-up connection, even in the age of widespread broadband access, on the rationale it would be harder to pinpoint its origins. Old laptops were distributed for these cyber operations. Even blogs with minor followings were reviewed to ensure no claim went unchecked. [Murdoch's World, pg. 67] In the book's endnotes, Folkenflik explains that "four former Fox News employees told me of these practices." It's unclear whether these tactics are ongoing. http://tinyurl.com/mzljlr4 What a surprise. About half of the people here are anonymous too. So what? Does anyone really take things they see in blogs, BBs and forums seriously? They are just echo chambers for people who want to find other people to agree with or to argue with. I love your consistency...everything is the same and when the righties misbehave, why, everyone does it and there's no difference and blah blah blah. How many faux accounts does MSNBC have? CNN? All the other media outlets? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest Faux News Update...Mark Sanford... | General | |||
Ahh, Faux News...stirring up the morons | General | |||
TeaBaggers Manipulated by Faux News | General | |||
Even Faux News Smells the Rat | General | |||
( OT ) Great debate (interview?) KWIATKOWSKI vs GIBSON (Faux "News"?) | General |