On 10/17/2013 7:42 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 10:39 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:03:45 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:




You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution
is to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or
icons?







I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a

polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.

Now that's being a champion of a cause, I guess. So why should
church's and religious institutions are 'dangerous' then why should
they be allowed to feed and cloth those who are without? That is the
governments job, isn't it?

BTW, my questions still stand.


I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I
do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for
several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a
violation of the Second Amendment.

Oh poo poo Harry. You have no problem violating things, fer instance IRS
rules, the trust of those with whom you do business, etc.