|
Cramming Religion Down Throats
On 10/18/13, 8:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:54:03 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote: Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment? How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms? First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and everyone else you can. Terrific. Why would you encourage foul gun play? Sarcasm, Harry, that wasn't funny even as a joke. We don't take gun violence seriously in this country, so what else is there but sarcasm? |
Cramming Religion Down Throats
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/18/13, 8:24 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:54:03 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote: Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment? How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms? First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and everyone else you can. Terrific. Why would you encourage foul gun play? Sarcasm, Harry, that wasn't funny even as a joke. We don't take gun violence seriously in this country, so what else is there but sarcasm? There are sick *******s like you that seem to have to own firearms and threaten others with them. |
Cramming Religion Down Throats
In article 417142672403824078.069666bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. In other words.."Dangerous" Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word: *inappropriate* ? Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"? inappropriate: Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper. dangerous: Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous, hazardous, risky, unsafe. Do you think these words are synonyms? What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate. It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist between church and state. What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"... Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh? Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding documents. So you don't consider that a "wall" between church and state? Now, I never, ever said that the founding fathers ever intended for there to be no religion, no prayer etc. |
Cramming Religion Down Throats
|
Cramming Religion Down Throats
In article 417142672403824078.069666bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. In other words.."Dangerous" Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word: *inappropriate* ? Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"? inappropriate: Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper. dangerous: Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous, hazardous, risky, unsafe. Do you think these words are synonyms? What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate. It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist between church and state. What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"... Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh? Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding documents. History isn't your strong point, as well as reading comprehension.... http://tinyurl.com/7o44m |
Cramming Religion Down Throats
|
Cramming Religion Down Throats
In article 1910862206403841873.295628bmckeenospam-
, says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/18/13, 6:47 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/18/13, 5:41 PM, Califbill wrote: iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. In other words.."Dangerous" Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word: *inappropriate* ? Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"? inappropriate: Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper. dangerous: Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous, hazardous, risky, unsafe. Do you think these words are synonyms? What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate. It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist between church and state. What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"... Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh? Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding documents. You don't understand the 1st Amendment or the disdain many of the founding fathers had for religion. And what has god to do with religion, assuming for the moment there were a god? You did not learn the 1st amendment was to prevent a state religion? Ala Church do England? The First Amendment is there for a number of reasons, including the desire to prevent establishment of a state religion. The religious clause was there for just one reason. NO STATE RELIGION! http://tinyurl.com/7o44m |
Cramming Religion Down Throats
On 10/19/13 6:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1910862206403841873.295628bmckeenospam- , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/18/13, 6:47 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/18/13, 5:41 PM, Califbill wrote: iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. In other words.."Dangerous" Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word: *inappropriate* ? Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"? inappropriate: Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper. dangerous: Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous, hazardous, risky, unsafe. Do you think these words are synonyms? What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate. It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist between church and state. What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"... Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh? Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding documents. You don't understand the 1st Amendment or the disdain many of the founding fathers had for religion. And what has god to do with religion, assuming for the moment there were a god? You did not learn the 1st amendment was to prevent a state religion? Ala Church do England? The First Amendment is there for a number of reasons, including the desire to prevent establishment of a state religion. The religious clause was there for just one reason. NO STATE RELIGION! http://tinyurl.com/7o44m Where does it say it in the Constitution? Free exercise of religion is also supported. Harry can not stand that part. Do we have a state religion? How many times was God invoked by the founding fathers? |
Cramming Religion Down Throats
On 10/19/13 6:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 417142672403824078.069666bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/17/2013 6:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a violation of the Second Amendment. In other words.."Dangerous" Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word: *inappropriate* ? Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"? inappropriate: Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper. dangerous: Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous, hazardous, risky, unsafe. Do you think these words are synonyms? What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate. It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist between church and state. What wall, show me that in the constitution.. this "wall"... Gee, never heard of seperation of church and state, eh? Where does it say there will be no religion contact to government in the constitution? The Constitution and the founders stated there would be no state religion. You forget they mention God a few times in the founding documents. History isn't your strong point, as well as reading comprehension.... http://tinyurl.com/7o44m Is a strong point. Do we have a State Religion? How many religions are allowed in Congress? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com