Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On 10/17/2013 7:42 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 10:39 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:03:45 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:




You mean in the same way that if a church or religious institution
is to be used as a polling place they should cover up any crosses or
icons?







I am absolutely opposed to any religious building being used as a

polling place, and I fought against that in Florida.

Now that's being a champion of a cause, I guess. So why should
church's and religious institutions are 'dangerous' then why should
they be allowed to feed and cloth those who are without? That is the
governments job, isn't it?

BTW, my questions still stand.


I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I
do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for
several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a
violation of the Second Amendment.

Oh poo poo Harry. You have no problem violating things, fer instance IRS
rules, the trust of those with whom you do business, etc.

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On 10/17/2013 7:56 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/16/13, 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:50:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

This is what us rightie-Christian-fundies do. If people are hungry we feed them regardless of who they are.



And you know, it seems that nobody accuses us of 'shoving' religion down their throats especially when they have their mouths full.





No religion accompanying the meals, eh?

I didn't say that. you did.

- - -

You're proselytizing the hungry, eh?

It is all about choice. If those who want to be fed aren't willing to listen a little bit of
talking while they are eating then they are free to choose to go somewhere elese and get
their food. You are pro-choice aren't you? Or, are you only pro-choice when it comes to
pregnancy?


Democrats are only pro choice when it keeps them from accountability....

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:42:46 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I

do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for

several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a

violation of the Second Amendment.

Krause telling us what is " inappropriate"...too much ****.

**** off Krause...go squeeze your pustules, you ****ing slug.

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I

do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for

several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a

violation of the Second Amendment.

In other words.."Dangerous"

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I

do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for

several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a

violation of the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment?

How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I

do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for

several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a

violation of the Second Amendment.

In other words.."Dangerous"


Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:
*inappropriate* ?

Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?

inappropriate:

Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.

dangerous:

Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,
hazardous, risky, unsafe.

Do you think these words are synonyms?

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I

do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for

several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a

violation of the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment?

How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?


First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to
church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and
everyone else you can. Terrific.

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate.

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



The Second Amendment?



How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the right of and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?





First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to

church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and

everyone else you can. Terrific.

Why would you encourage foul gun play?

Cramming Religion Down Throats
 

On 10/17/13, 6:28 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:18:24 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:11 PM, Tim wrote:

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you did. But I



do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for



several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a



violation of the Second Amendment.



In other words.."Dangerous"





Why are you looking for "other words" when I provided the exact word:

*inappropriate* ?



Why are you equating the word "inappropriate" with the word "dangerous"?



inappropriate:



Not appropriate; unsuitable to the particular case; unfitting, improper.



dangerous:



Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous,

hazardous, risky, unsafe.



Do you think these words are synonyms?

What would be considered "inappropriate" about casting a vote inside a building dedicated as a house of worship? Is it because some one just might receive religious leanings there? If that be the case, the in you're view I'd think that 'dangerous' would be a term deemed appropriate.



It is inappropriate because it mocks the wall that is supposed to exist
between church and state. For the average citizen, nothing is more
"statelike" than voting for public officials, and that voting should
take place in politically neutral places, like public schools, fire
stations, public libraries, et cetera. A church is not a politically
neutral place.

When I lived in Virginia, we voted at a firehouse. Here, our polling
place is the activities room of a public grammar school.

It took me several years and the threat of a lawsuit to get our polling
place in Florida moved out of an extremist fundamentalist church. Even a
supermarket would have been a more appropriate place.