value of unions
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/13/13, 1:22 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
On 10/13/13 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:25:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

That was before OSHA, labor laws and TV lawyers.

Which came about because of organized unions.

Like most things, they ran out of things to make better so they
started making things worse and now they are done.

Things are worse now because we don't have kids 10 years old getting
hands severed, working 15 hour days in unsafe factories with no safety
equipment, if you get hurt you are just out of a job, bosses that beat
them to get more production, and on and on? Really?

Things are worse in union states because companies are moving to right
to work states ... and we don't have 10 year olds getting their hands
cut off, without the union.

Oh ****!!! You've GOT to be kidding me!!!! Of course you don't have kids
getting hands cut off, laws and work rules are in place because of the
unions of the past. That above is just silly and something I'd expect of
Scotty.

The problem with unions, especially "public service unions" is
extortion. BART rapid transit has already struck once and the 60 day
cooling off period is expiring. They demand 4% a year for the next 4
years. Lowest paid starting job is janitor. $57,000 a year. Train
drivers are making $70k a year. GED or HS diploma required. Maybe.
They pay $93 a month for their health plan, no matter how big the family
is. Fully paid retirement plan. Making more than teachers, and most of
the riders. Lots here have taken big cuts in pay, or lost their jobs.
2600 applicants when ever a BART job opens up. The union demanding a
raise while vastly overpaid or they shut down the commuter trains for a
half million riders. Extortion.


$70,000 a year is chump change for someone who has to live in the S.F. area.

Bull****! Teachers in my city, Pleasanton, are the highest paid teachers
in the state. Most have Masters degrees. BART worker makes more. Not
everyone in the Bay Area is a computer mogul. Lots do very well as grocery
clerks, accountants, store clerks, and are maybe doing $50k a year.

value of unions
 

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:59:30 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:09:51 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:16:47 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

It's the 'race to the bottom' in pricing that concerns me not to
mention the conditions our fellow human beings are forced to endure in order to eat.
Sure paints a bleak picture for our grandkids future.
Y'all can't live on borrowed money forever.

You realize that attitude violates the beliefs of the liberals in this country....right?
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


I still want to know how the liberal democratic mind can conceive that
borrowing MORE money is somehow "paying your debts".

We are broke and can't pay our debts so the fix is to borrow more
money? I hope I die before this whole house of cards falls in on us
and I feel bad for our kids who will have to dig out of that rubble.

What happens when the creditor nation(s) decide they get to define USA
policy?

===

Attendance at Chinese language night school classes will be mandatory.

value of unions
 

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:17:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:48:30 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:18:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:10:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Things are worse now because we don't have kids 10 years old getting
hands severed, working 15 hour days in unsafe factories with no safety
equipment, if you get hurt you are just out of a job, bosses that beat
them to get more production, and on and on? Really?

Things are worse in union states because companies are moving to right
to work states ... and we don't have 10 year olds getting their hands
cut off, without the union.

Oh ****!!! You've GOT to be kidding me!!!! Of course you don't have kids
getting hands cut off, laws and work rules are in place because of the
unions of the past.

That is the past. What do we have them for now?

So we don't go back to slave labor.




How does that go?

Whoosh?

I totally understood your question, and answered.

... with a ridiculous statement.

What's ridiculous about that statement? Hell, I remember when I was a
kid, there was a wooden chair factory in the next town that would hire
just about anybody. They would have these 'meetings' whenever there was
talk of unions going about. Tell everyone how bad it would be. There
were gang drill presses, saws, etc. with guards taken off, safety
switches disabled, etc. I worked there one summer after I turned 16, ran
a gang drill, foreman would speed it up, just tell you to get used to
it, then come back awhile later, speed it up some more. There were many
people who worked there that had missing fingers and other various
injuries. There was a fire there and it injured several people, no fire
extinguishers around! It's now a union shop, and contrary to other's
FOXite views, they've actually grown, but now it's a safe, clean place
to work. I went in there with a friend who was now a supervisor, and
what a difference, safe machinery, not breathing wood dust and fumes,
and the steam room where they put trainloads of wood slats to bend
actually had an outer area so that workers there didn't have to work in
130 degree heat.

Cite, or more of this: http://tinyurl.com/cldsgvu

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

value of unions
 

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:43:59 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:09:51 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:16:47 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

It's the 'race to the bottom' in pricing that concerns me not to mention the conditions our fellow human beings are forced to endure in order to eat.
Sure paints a bleak picture for our grandkids future.
Y'all can't live on borrowed money forever.

You realize that attitude violates the beliefs of the liberals in this country....right?
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


I still want to know how the liberal democratic mind can conceive that
borrowing MORE money is somehow "paying your debts".

We are broke and can't pay our debts so the fix is to borrow more
money? I hope I die before this whole house of cards falls in on us
and I feel bad for our kids who will have to dig out of that rubble.


Well, I had an ex-wife who I believe thought that way.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

value of unions
 

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:00:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:09:51 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:16:47 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

It's the 'race to the bottom' in pricing that concerns me not to mention the conditions our fellow human beings are forced to endure in order to eat.
Sure paints a bleak picture for our grandkids future.
Y'all can't live on borrowed money forever.

You realize that attitude violates the beliefs of the liberals in this country....right?
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


I still want to know how the liberal democratic mind can conceive that
borrowing MORE money is somehow "paying your debts".

It's not, that's just what FOX says. It amazes me the people that think
it's only a "democratic" thing.


Just how many hours a day do you devote to FOX News, Kevin?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

value of unions
 

On 10/14/2013 8:27 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 10:22:04 -0700, Bill McKee wrote:

On 10/13/13 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:25:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

That was before OSHA, labor laws and TV lawyers.

Which came about because of organized unions.

Like most things, they ran out of things to make better so they
started making things worse and now they are done.

Things are worse now because we don't have kids 10 years old getting
hands severed, working 15 hour days in unsafe factories with no safety
equipment, if you get hurt you are just out of a job, bosses that beat
them to get more production, and on and on? Really?

Things are worse in union states because companies are moving to right
to work states ... and we don't have 10 year olds getting their hands
cut off, without the union.

Oh ****!!! You've GOT to be kidding me!!!! Of course you don't have kids
getting hands cut off, laws and work rules are in place because of the
unions of the past. That above is just silly and something I'd expect of
Scotty.

Scotty, Scotty, Scotty, Scotty, Scotty.. man kevin, don't you get it? I
really think you are nothing but a drunken coward and I don't consider
you really man enough to give a **** what you say... Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face...

value of unions
 

In article 1318168319403476969.370197bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:48:30 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:18:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:10:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Things are worse now because we don't have kids 10 years old getting
hands severed, working 15 hour days in unsafe factories with no safety
equipment, if you get hurt you are just out of a job, bosses that beat
them to get more production, and on and on? Really?

Things are worse in union states because companies are moving to right
to work states ... and we don't have 10 year olds getting their hands
cut off, without the union.

Oh ****!!! You've GOT to be kidding me!!!! Of course you don't have kids
getting hands cut off, laws and work rules are in place because of the
unions of the past.

That is the past. What do we have them for now?

So we don't go back to slave labor.




How does that go?

Whoosh?

I totally understood your question, and answered.

... with a ridiculous statement.

What's ridiculous about that statement? Hell, I remember when I was a
kid, there was a wooden chair factory in the next town that would hire
just about anybody. They would have these 'meetings' whenever there was
talk of unions going about. Tell everyone how bad it would be. There
were gang drill presses, saws, etc. with guards taken off, safety
switches disabled, etc. I worked there one summer after I turned 16, ran
a gang drill, foreman would speed it up, just tell you to get used to
it, then come back awhile later, speed it up some more. There were many
people who worked there that had missing fingers and other various
injuries. There was a fire there and it injured several people, no fire
extinguishers around! It's now a union shop, and contrary to other's
FOXite views, they've actually grown, but now it's a safe, clean place
to work. I went in there with a friend who was now a supervisor, and
what a difference, safe machinery, not breathing wood dust and fumes,
and the steam room where they put trainloads of wood slats to bend
actually had an outer area so that workers there didn't have to work in
130 degree heat.

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

Well, no. But then again, you don't care about facts.

value of unions
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:59:30 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

iBoaterer wrote:


What's ridiculous about that statement? Hell, I remember when I was a
kid, there was a wooden chair factory in the next town that would hire
just about anybody. They would have these 'meetings' whenever there was
talk of unions going about. Tell everyone how bad it would be. There
were gang drill presses, saws, etc. with guards taken off, safety
switches disabled, etc. I worked there one summer after I turned 16, ran
a gang drill, foreman would speed it up, just tell you to get used to
it, then come back awhile later, speed it up some more. There were many
people who worked there that had missing fingers and other various
injuries. There was a fire there and it injured several people, no fire
extinguishers around! It's now a union shop, and contrary to other's
FOXite views, they've actually grown, but now it's a safe, clean place
to work. I went in there with a friend who was now a supervisor, and
what a difference, safe machinery, not breathing wood dust and fumes,
and the steam room where they put trainloads of wood slats to bend
actually had an outer area so that workers there didn't have to work in
130 degree heat.

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

value of unions
 

In article , says...

On 10/14/2013 8:27 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 10:22:04 -0700, Bill McKee wrote:

On 10/13/13 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:25:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

That was before OSHA, labor laws and TV lawyers.

Which came about because of organized unions.

Like most things, they ran out of things to make better so they
started making things worse and now they are done.

Things are worse now because we don't have kids 10 years old getting
hands severed, working 15 hour days in unsafe factories with no safety
equipment, if you get hurt you are just out of a job, bosses that beat
them to get more production, and on and on? Really?

Things are worse in union states because companies are moving to right
to work states ... and we don't have 10 year olds getting their hands
cut off, without the union.

Oh ****!!! You've GOT to be kidding me!!!! Of course you don't have kids
getting hands cut off, laws and work rules are in place because of the
unions of the past. That above is just silly and something I'd expect of
Scotty.

Scotty, Scotty, Scotty, Scotty, Scotty.. man kevin, don't you get it? I
really think you are nothing but a drunken coward and I don't consider
you really man enough to give a **** what you say... Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face...

Listen, you mess with my kid and you'll live to regret it. Got it? Now
go ahead and call my bluff. I ****ing DARE you.

value of unions
 

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.
That's downright creepy.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:
Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.
That's downright creepy.

What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of
yours?

value of unions
 

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?

Come on, hankie.
You read all of IBoater's posts.
Do I have to fill in the blanks for y'all?

value of unions
 

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

value of unions
 

In article , says...

On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

I didn't know he had, and I WILL take action!

value of unions
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:50:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

Does this place have a name

Yes.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 11:15 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

I didn't know he had, and I WILL take action!


Is he sending naughty photos of himself to your kid via email? Wouldn't
surprise me if he were.

value of unions
 

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:51:55 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:15:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:50:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

Does this place have a name

Yes.

cite

LOL!

Jeeeezz!

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

value of unions
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:15:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:50:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

Does this place have a name

Yes.

cite

http://tinyurl.com/kwo54lq

http://www.americansworking.com/furniture.html

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!

Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.

value of unions
 

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 13:56:22 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:

On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:



Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.



That's downright creepy.







What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of



yours?





On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.



see his exact words:

" Remember, I talked

to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."



As I said... CREEPY!



Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.


Well, be careful who you associate with...you could get dragged down in Snottie's mess.

value of unions
 

In article om,
says...

On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!

Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.

Narrow mindedness seems to be a conservative thing!

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 1:01 PM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 13:56:22 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:

On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:



Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.



That's downright creepy.







What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of



yours?





On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.



see his exact words:

" Remember, I talked

to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."



As I said... CREEPY!



Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.


Well, be careful who you associate with...you could get dragged down in Snottie's mess.

FlaJim, Herring, Snotty, and most of the other hard-core righties here
are political regressives.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 1:11 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 1:01 PM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 13:56:22 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:

On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:



Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.



That's downright creepy.







What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of



yours?





On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.



see his exact words:

" Remember, I talked

to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."



As I said... CREEPY!



Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.


Well, be careful who you associate with...you could get dragged down
in Snottie's mess.

FlaJim, Herring, Snotty, and most of the other hard-core righties here
are political regressives.


YOUR LITTLE BUDDY IS STILL MESSING UP THREADS ON HIS CRAPPY BLACKBERRY.
DON'T YOU HAVE AN OLD APPLE SOMETHING YOU COULD DONATE TO YOUR 20TH
CENTURY TECHNICALLY CHALLENGED BOWLEGGED LITTLE CHUM?

value of unions
 

In article , says...

On 10/15/13, 1:01 PM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 13:56:22 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:

On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:



Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.



That's downright creepy.







What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of



yours?





On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.



see his exact words:

" Remember, I talked

to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."



As I said... CREEPY!



Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.


Well, be careful who you associate with...you could get dragged down in Snottie's mess.

FlaJim, Herring, Snotty, and most of the other hard-core righties here
are political regressives.

I don't give a crap what his politics is, he's now claimed to be messing
with a minor child. I knew by his vulgar, nasty posts about other
poster's family members that he was a low class pig, now find out that
he's actually contacting children of posters with it is WAY overboard.
We'll see if a by-the-books approach gets this scum off the streets away
from children. If not, there's other options.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/13, 1:01 PM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 13:56:22 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:57 AM, True North wrote:

On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:

On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:



Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.



That's downright creepy.







What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of



yours?





On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.



see his exact words:

" Remember, I talked

to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."



As I said... CREEPY!



Whatever Loogie says doesn't interest me.


Well, be careful who you associate with...you could get dragged down in Snottie's mess.

FlaJim, Herring, Snotty, and most of the other hard-core righties here
are political regressives.

I don't give a crap what his politics is, he's now claimed to be messing
with a minor child. I knew by his vulgar, nasty posts about other
poster's family members that he was a low class pig, now find out that
he's actually contacting children of posters with it is WAY overboard.
We'll see if a by-the-books approach gets this scum off the streets away
from children. If not, there's other options.


I won't argue that with you. If a psychopath like Scotty were contacting
my blood relatives, I'd call the authorities right away.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 11:19 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 11:15 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


I didn't know he had, and I WILL take action!

Ummmm, she was over 18 and contacted my SHIRT SALES EMAIL, to order a
replacement SHIRT for one that had been burned in a fire..... Period...
And you are fully aware of it then too... so **** off....

So now I will be contacting my local and yours to make sure you intend
to "take action" against me for running a retail business...

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 11:05 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:50:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

Does this place have a name


These guys are still building simple, beautiful furniture... This is the
guy I was talking about all those years when I spoke of the boss of any
operation "having sawdust in his hair"... R H Lemieur.. Simple, and
built by hand in norther Mass, a little backyard shop really....

http://rhlemieur.com/

value of unions
 

In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

value of unions
 

In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:19 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 11:15 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


I didn't know he had, and I WILL take action!

Ummmm, she was over 18 and contacted my SHIRT SALES EMAIL, to order a
replacement SHIRT for one that had been burned in a fire..... Period...
And you are fully aware of it then too... so **** off....

So now I will be contacting my local and yours to make sure you intend
to "take action" against me for running a retail business...

I don't have any kids over 18, **** for brains. She has none of your shirts, and never burned anything in any fire that I know of.
I've never seen one of your t-shirts, and am not "aware" of anything except you saying you've contacted her via email.

value of unions
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:47:33 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:15:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:50:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

Does this place have a name

Yes.

cite

http://tinyurl.com/kwo54lq

http://www.americansworking.com/furniture.html

I figured you were just going to google up some American furniture
companies.

You never disappoint.

It's what YOU asked for!

value of unions
 

iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 1:55 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

Krause sure does like messin with you.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 1:58 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
so **** off...
Sage advice.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 2:24 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?


She emailed me... If you file a false report knowing that, I will file
charges and sue too.....

value of unions
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?

Oh, you wanted them?

value of unions
 

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:47:33 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:15:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:50:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

One of the only US furniture factories still existing?

I doubt it still exists. They are making those chairs in Vietnam now.

Wrong. I told you, still exists, and thriving. Doing better than ever
and that's with the unions.

Does this place have a name

Yes.

cite

http://tinyurl.com/kwo54lq

http://www.americansworking.com/furniture.html

I figured you were just going to google up some American furniture
companies.

You never disappoint.

It's what YOU asked for!

Not really.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 4:05 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 1:55 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

Krause sure does like messin with you.

He did send the cops to my house once, I was busy and didn't need the
aggravation.... if it happens again here, I will sue whoever does it and
see to it they are charged with filing a false police report...

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 4:56 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 4:05 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 1:55 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

Krause sure does like messin with you.

He did send the cops to my house once, I was busy and didn't need the
aggravation.... if it happens again here, I will sue whoever does it and
see to it they are charged with filing a false police report...

You made a physical threat, psycho. It was documented. There was written
evidence. There were witnesses. You make physical threats, you get the
cops. The report from the cops was a lot different from what you
reported here.

No one needs to "get" you into trouble. Your uncontrolled mouth does it
for you.