Harry
 

On 10/13/2013 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:47:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:





"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that,
but that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.

Didn't work for me. Your whole post is gone. But, I think it's my reader setup.

I don't think it's your reader.

Harry
 

On 10/13/2013 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:34:45 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 10/10/2013 11:47 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:




"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that,
but that's my story and I'mThunderbird
stickin' with it.

It didn't work. Your reply appended John's post. Why don't you try it
with your other computer.

Are you using 'Agent'?

Thunderbird

Harry
 

On 10/13/2013 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:47:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:





"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that,
but that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.

Didn't work for me. Your whole post is gone. But, I think it's my reader setup.


Still think it's on Dicks end.. His posts are the only ones who this
happens to for me. I use thunderbird too..

Harry
 

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:41:04 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 10/13/2013 4:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:47:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:





"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that,
but that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.

Didn't work for me. Your whole post is gone. But, I think it's my reader setup.

I don't think it's your reader.

I took the two dashes and space out of my sig line and it worked fine. It was me and my reader.
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!