|
Harry
"Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... On 10/10/2013 11:21 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. This time your reply appended John's sig line and, of course, my newsreader stripped it automatically when I made this reply to you --------------------- Standby. I am going to try something. It will be a repeat reply to John's original post (above). |
Harry
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message web.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! ------------------------------------- John, I wasn't referring to your signature line obviously. I usually strip them in replies as a matter of habit. Signature lines are nice and everything but if a thread gets long with many replies that quote everything previously said, it gets old having to scroll down through all the quotes and repeated signature lines (especially the political agenda ones) just to see that somebody added, "Cite". I try, not always successfully, to cut previous quotes that are not germane to a reply or comment I intend to add. Keeps it cleaner for me and minimizes erroneous attributes which seem to happen quite often here. There. Hank, did that work? |
Harry
"Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 22:39:24 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: It's reading it in html. I post in text only. I am not sure what to change, so I'll leave things alone. It's not your separator alone. I think it's your separator in conjunction with mine, and when I try to get rid of mine Agent says a 'persona' of 'none' won't work. I'm not wild about this new, to me, Agent. I use Newstaplite on the Ipad as Apple does not come with a. Newsreader. Different shade of gray for sig lines, and Dick's post show up as a sig line. Thing I disliked on the Newer Windows newsreader is it did not put the extra character in front of the quoted area. So you had to add some type of separator. But both my Windows machines died within a couple days, so ordered a new iMac. |
Harry
True North wrote:
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 11:43:15 UTC-3, John H wrote: On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. -- John H. Really, Johnny.. in light of your unsociable behavior day after day, many would doubt your sincerity. Talk about unsociable behavior. |
Harry
On 10/10/2013 11:47 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. It didn't work. Your reply appended John's post. Why don't you try it with your other computer. |
Harry
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:21:34 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message aweb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. (have no clue what to do here) John, I wasn't referring to your signature line obviously. I usually strip them in replies as a matter of habit. Signature lines are nice and everything but if a thread gets long with many replies that quote everything previously said, it gets old having to scroll down through all the quotes and repeated signature lines (especially the political agenda ones) just to see that somebody added, "Cite". I try, not always successfully, to cut previous quotes that are not germane to a reply or comment I intend to add. Keeps it cleaner for me and minimizes erroneous attributes which seem to happen quite often here. *************** I know, I know. That was what you'd call a 'tongue in cheek' reply! Oh, and BTW, again your post was deleted when I hit the 'reply' button. It's above only because I pasted it there. Really weird. -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
Harry
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:29:58 -0400, Hank© wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:21 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. This time your reply appended John's sig line and, of course, my newsreader stripped it automatically when I made this reply to you That's what's happening to me. -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
Harry
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:47:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message aweb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. Didn't work for me. Your whole post is gone. But, I think it's my reader setup. -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
Harry
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:34:45 -0400, Hank© wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:47 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. It didn't work. Your reply appended John's post. Why don't you try it with your other computer. Are you using 'Agent'? -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
Harry
On 10/13/2013 4:28 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:21:34 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote: "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen? I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them because some people here like to make big political statements over and over again using their signature line as the vehicle. I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm stickin' with it. (have no clue what to do here) John, I wasn't referring to your signature line obviously. I usually strip them in replies as a matter of habit. Signature lines are nice and everything but if a thread gets long with many replies that quote everything previously said, it gets old having to scroll down through all the quotes and repeated signature lines (especially the political agenda ones) just to see that somebody added, "Cite". I try, not always successfully, to cut previous quotes that are not germane to a reply or comment I intend to add. Keeps it cleaner for me and minimizes erroneous attributes which seem to happen quite often here. *************** I know, I know. That was what you'd call a 'tongue in cheek' reply! Oh, and BTW, again your post was deleted when I hit the 'reply' button. It's above only because I pasted it there. Really weird. He must have caught the *Donnie can't post correctly* disease. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com