Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "amdx" wrote in message ... "Mr.Luddite" says... I agree, it's time we got to hell out of the idea that we are the world police. "It's not rocket science. Done. I've dealt with the national debt. Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct." So is this the solution to our national debt with you have dealt? Mikek ------------------------ Not sure to whom you addressed your question Mikek, but my point was that our Navy is structured for the Cold War Era when bigger and badder was important. That's not the case anymore. We could cut the size of our Naval battle groups in half and still be 5 times the size of any other Navy in the world. Hank's idea of giving a few away to trusted allies is an excellent idea. Maintains the original overall strength and shares the cost of operating and maintaining the fleets. One of the new carriers currently under construction is the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78). Total cost, including research and development is currently projected to be over $14 billion. When commissioned it will have a *daily* operating cost of $7 million. Might not pay off the national debt, but it's money we really don't need to spend. There are two more scheduled after the Ford. Meanwhile, the last of the Nimitz class aircraft carriers (which the Ford class replaces) won't be taken out of service until 2058. We donate about 25 percent of ex-Navy destroyers and cruisers to allies now, rather than scrap them. Why not give away a few battle groups? |