What Teabaggerism Begets
 

Terry McAuliffe.
Common trash.
But when the choice is a teabagger or common trash, Virginia will vote
common trash.
That's what happens when the choice is common trash or teabagger.
Lesser of two evils.
What a shame there's no decent Republican in that race.
Problem is, I don't know if any decent Republicans exist.
Think they all controlled by teabaggers.
The devil made me do it!

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:27:41 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:


Terry Terry McAuliffe.
Common trash.
But when the choice is a teabagger or common trash, Virginia will vote
common trash.
That's what happens when the choice is common trash or teabagger.
Lesser of two evils.
What a shame there's no decent Republican in that race.
Problem is, I don't know if any decent Republicans exist.
Think they all controlled by teabaggers.
The devil made me do it!

Do you understand how stupid it makes you sound when you can't
complete a sentence without a slur?

I think you are smarter than that but I am starting to wonder.

Defend the likes of McAuliffe and Cuccinelli all you like.
Condemn my characterization of them all you like.
Call me stupid all you like.
Wa Wa Wa.
Then go ahead and obliquely slur those you disagree with using your own
terminology all you like. Hypocrite.
Make up numbers all you like.
Until you come up with cogent solutions to our national debt, expect to
be hammered for your childish criticisms of others.
I already mentioned that Simpson Bowles is the template. Nobody likes
everything about it. Nobody. That's called "compromise."

It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct.
How the goal is achieved as time progresses can be fought about as time
progresses. Just keep eyes on progress toward the goal.

Chicken littles don't help at all.
The teabaggers and lefties are impediments that must be overcome.
You'll just have to decide where you fall in.
Looks like I'm right in the middle.
With a plan that WILL eliminate the debt.
My solution right there, and my right to call anybody who disagrees a
teabagger, a hamster, a snake, or anything I please.
Haven't heard squat from you. Just chicken little crap.
So put up or shut up. Without a stand, you have no standing.

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

On 10/8/2013 1:51 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:27:41 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:


Terry Terry McAuliffe.
Common trash.
But when the choice is a teabagger or common trash, Virginia will vote
common trash.
That's what happens when the choice is common trash or teabagger.
Lesser of two evils.
What a shame there's no decent Republican in that race.
Problem is, I don't know if any decent Republicans exist.
Think they all controlled by teabaggers.
The devil made me do it!

Do you understand how stupid it makes you sound when you can't
complete a sentence without a slur?

I think you are smarter than that but I am starting to wonder.

Defend the likes of McAuliffe and Cuccinelli all you like.
Condemn my characterization of them all you like.
Call me stupid all you like.
Wa Wa Wa.
Then go ahead and obliquely slur those you disagree with using your own
terminology all you like. Hypocrite.
Make up numbers all you like.
Until you come up with cogent solutions to our national debt, expect to
be hammered for your childish criticisms of others.
I already mentioned that Simpson Bowles is the template. Nobody likes
everything about it. Nobody. That's called "compromise."

It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct.

Do you have that on a site?
Or can you put it on a site.
Mikek

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

On 10/7/2013 11:59 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:27:41 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:


Terry McAuliffe.
Common trash.
But when the choice is a teabagger or common trash, Virginia will vote
common trash.
That's what happens when the choice is common trash or teabagger.
Lesser of two evils.
What a shame there's no decent Republican in that race.
Problem is, I don't know if any decent Republicans exist.
Think they all controlled by teabaggers.
The devil made me do it!

Do you understand how stupid it makes you sound when you can't
complete a sentence without a slur?

I think you are smarter than that but I am starting to wonder.

He might be smarter than that but you need to verify his smartness
before you give him a pass. He sounds like a moron to me. I could be wrong.

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

"Mr.Luddite" says...

I agree, it's time we got to hell out of the idea that we are the world
police.


"It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct."

So is this the solution to our national debt with you have dealt?

Mikek

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

In article , says...

"Mr.Luddite" says...

I agree, it's time we got to hell out of the idea that we are the world
police.


"It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct."

So is this the solution to our national debt with you have dealt?

Mikek

WTF does that drivel have to do with my statement to Luddite??

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

"amdx" wrote in message ...


"Mr.Luddite" says...

I agree, it's time we got to hell out of the idea that we are the
world
police.


"It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct."

So is this the solution to our national debt with you have dealt?

Mikek

------------------------

Not sure to whom you addressed your question Mikek, but my point was
that our Navy is structured for the Cold War Era when bigger and
badder was important. That's not the case anymore.

We could cut the size of our Naval battle groups in half and still be
5 times the size of any other Navy in the world. Hank's idea of
giving a few away to trusted allies is an excellent idea. Maintains
the original overall strength and shares the cost of operating and
maintaining the fleets.

One of the new carriers currently under construction is the USS Gerald
R. Ford (CVN-78). Total cost, including research and development is
currently projected to be over $14 billion. When commissioned it
will have a *daily* operating cost of $7 million. Might not pay off
the national debt, but it's money we really don't need to spend.
There are two more scheduled after the Ford. Meanwhile, the last of
the Nimitz class aircraft carriers (which the Ford class replaces)
won't be taken out of service until 2058.

We donate about 25 percent of ex-Navy destroyers and cruisers to
allies now, rather than scrap them. Why not give away a few battle
groups?

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

On Monday, October 7, 2013 11:59:14 PM UTC-4, wrote:


Flagged for the **** that it is.

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 9:30:27 AM UTC-4, Hank© wrote:

I could be wrong.

No, you are correct. He IS a moron.

What Teabaggerism Begets
 

On 10/8/2013 3:24 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

"Mr.Luddite" says...

I agree, it's time we got to hell out of the idea that we are the world
police.


"It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct."

So is this the solution to our national debt with you have dealt?

Mikek

WTF does that drivel have to do with my statement to Luddite??


This is what you said,
"It's not rocket science.
Done. I've dealt with the national debt.
Implement it and consider the debt reduction goals in it sacrosanct."

So what is your solution to spending $3.5 trillion when you only have
$2.2 trillion of income?
Mikek