On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

On 10/3/2013 3:15 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

Mrs. average American prolly.

In article , says...

On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

More likely than not she is a registred Democrat.

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

More likely than not she is a registred Democrat.

"More likely than not"? Do you have any data to back that up?

On Friday, October 4, 2013 8:52:18 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



In article , says...



On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

...reports of several police injured but no verification.



Where are our armed government-hating righties?





Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House

security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?



More likely than not she is a registred Democrat.



"More likely than not"? Do you have any data to back that up?

How come you didn't question harry when he suggested a couple "conservative" women? Statistically, it would be nearly impossible for that woman to be a conservative, although not totally impossible... Anyway, if you do answer, try to do it like an adult, and make your case if you can?

On 10/4/13 11:07 AM, wrote:

How come you didn't question harry when he suggested a couple "conservative" women? Statistically, it would be nearly impossible for that woman to be a conservative, although not totally impossible... Anyway, if you do answer, try to do it like an adult, and make your case if you can?


Earlier today, you said you were going to "stop" your obstreperous
behavior. Apparently you didn't mean that.

On Friday, October 4, 2013 11:11:53 AM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
On 10/4/13 11:07 AM, wrote:



How come you didn't question harry when he suggested a couple "conservative" women? Statistically, it would be nearly impossible for that woman to be a conservative, although not totally impossible... Anyway, if you do answer, try to do it like an adult, and make your case if you can?





Earlier today, you said you were going to "stop" your obstreperous

behavior. Apparently you didn't mean that.

I asked a question without name calling... Do you think he can answer it beyond calling me an idiot?

On 10/4/13 11:14 AM, wrote:
On Friday, October 4, 2013 11:11:53 AM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
On 10/4/13 11:07 AM, wrote:



How come you didn't question harry when he suggested a couple "conservative" women? Statistically, it would be nearly impossible for that woman to be a conservative, although not totally impossible... Anyway, if you do answer, try to do it like an adult, and make your case if you can?





Earlier today, you said you were going to "stop" your obstreperous

behavior. Apparently you didn't mean that.

I asked a question without name calling... Do you think he can answer it beyond calling me an idiot?



You want someone to "make a case" about a throwaway joke line of mine? Why?

In article ,
says...

On Friday, October 4, 2013 11:11:53 AM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
On 10/4/13 11:07 AM, wrote:



How come you didn't question harry when he suggested a couple "conservative" women? Statistically, it would be nearly impossible for that woman to be a conservative, although not totally impossible... Anyway, if you do answer, try to do it like an adult, and make your case if you can?





Earlier today, you said you were going to "stop" your obstreperous

behavior. Apparently you didn't mean that.

I asked a question without name calling... Do you think he can answer it beyond calling me an idiot?

I did, Jawbone!

On 10/4/2013 11:11 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/4/13 11:07 AM, wrote:

How come you didn't question harry when he suggested a couple
"conservative" women? Statistically, it would be nearly impossible
for that woman to be a conservative, although not totally
impossible... Anyway, if you do answer, try to do it like an adult,
and make your case if you can?


Earlier today, you said you were going to "stop" your obstreperous
behavior. Apparently you didn't mean that.

Only someone with 7 years of intensive post secondary English learnin
could come up with a word like that to use on us commoners.