In article ,
says...

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 07:32:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:15:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

Don't go all CNN on us. Let's wait and see what really happened.
It does appear that the cops shot up her car ... with her kid in it.

Wait, it's "all CNN" because the woman acted crazed???

The CNN reference is about reporting things before they know what is
true

But, you watch a video with a cop boat crashing into another on a turn
and instantly made quite exacting conclusions about why it happened.....

In article , says...

On 10/4/2013 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 07:32:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:15:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

Don't go all CNN on us. Let's wait and see what really happened.
It does appear that the cops shot up her car ... with her kid in it.

Wait, it's "all CNN" because the woman acted crazed???

The CNN reference is about reporting things before they know what is
true.


The CNN reference is about reporting things before they know what is
true, based on a predetermined and prepaid political and social agenda...

What did they report about this before they "knew what is true"?

On 10/4/2013 1:03 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


What did they report about this before they "knew what is true"?


By the context of Greg's statement I assumed he was talking about CNN's
history of reporting things before they know what is true... I believe
he was trying to coin a phrase, "go all CNN".

He specifically said to the poster, "don't go all CNN". If you read
for context, and breathe, you will see he or I *never, ever* suggested
CNN did that here to this story... In context it's clear he was
suggesting that the poster may be going "all CNN" on us... Get it?

Either way, the answer to your question is "nothing that I know of".. I
hope you find my answer polite and professional

In article , says...

On 10/4/13 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 07:32:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:15:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/3/13 2:50 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...reports of several police injured but no verification.

Where are our armed government-hating righties?


Turns out to be a woman who first tried to crash through the White House
security gates. Crazy woman...Palin? Bachmann?

Don't go all CNN on us. Let's wait and see what really happened.
It does appear that the cops shot up her car ... with her kid in it.

Wait, it's "all CNN" because the woman acted crazed???

The CNN reference is about reporting things before they know what is
true


You don't think someone is deranged if they try to crash the gates at
the White House with a car when she has a baby in the car, bangs up two
policemen, and drives off at 80 mph towards the Capitol while shots are
being fired at her? What was CNN reporting about the incident before
they "know what is true"?

PMS