| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
I was under the impression that this site was about boats. I looks more like a **** and moan page to me.
I think that there are more fitting places to express venom. Please keep it to BOATS |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:52:54 +0100, jrags mung wrote:
I was under the impression that this site was about boats. I looks more like a **** and moan page to me. I think that there are more fitting places to express venom. Please keep it to BOATS So tell us about your boat! -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
Probably less than half the regulars have boats, nor do they have any interest in boating.
Too bad there isn't a way to exclude them from polluting the newsgroup. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/3/2013 8:29 PM, True North wrote:
Probably less than half the regulars have boats, nor do they have any interest in boating. Too bad there isn't a way to exclude them from polluting the newsgroup. Are you serious? So don, what is the cutoff for boats to count as boats.. Let me guess, 6 inches shorter and ten pounds lighter than your boat, right? I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, or are you just posing as a rich guy until mom's money runs out? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:00:15 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/3/2013 8:29 PM, True North wrote: Probably less than half the regulars have boats, nor do they have any interest in boating. Too bad there isn't a way to exclude them from polluting the newsgroup. Are you serious? So don, what is the cutoff for boats to count as boats.. Let me guess, 6 inches shorter and ten pounds lighter than your boat, right? I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, or are you just posing as a rich guy until mom's money runs out? I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition. Is it in "several" pieces at this time? Too bad you didn't take care of it. As far as posing as a rich guy.. I'd love to if I could, but I dedicated my working life in service of my country and live on a couple of modest pensions. My mom's money was split 5 ways, unlike Inky's money and real estate which went to one undeserving, ungrateful Peter Pan wannabe. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/3/2013 9:09 PM, True North wrote:
I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, Don, answer the question... I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition. I didn't.. Is it in "several" pieces at this time? Too bad you didn't take care of it. Thanks for your concern, but I had other more pressing issues than a plywood boat, I was not using... You didn't have a boat for a while, and you didn't leave the group, are you just a hypocrite? Rhetorical question..... |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/3/13 9:09 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:00:15 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote: On 10/3/2013 8:29 PM, True North wrote: Probably less than half the regulars have boats, nor do they have any interest in boating. Too bad there isn't a way to exclude them from polluting the newsgroup. Are you serious? So don, what is the cutoff for boats to count as boats.. Let me guess, 6 inches shorter and ten pounds lighter than your boat, right? I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, or are you just posing as a rich guy until mom's money runs out? I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition. Is it in "several" pieces at this time? Too bad you didn't take care of it. Is that the one that rotted into splinters? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:24:57 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/3/2013 9:09 PM, True North wrote: I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, Don, answer the question... I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition. I didn't.. Is it in "several" pieces at this time? Too bad you didn't take care of it. Thanks for your concern, but I had other more pressing issues than a plywood boat, I was not using... You didn't have a boat for a while, and you didn't leave the group, are you just a hypocrite? Rhetorical question..... Again you show your utter stupidity...or you are just telling bald faced lies. I have owned one boat or another since I came here except in 2007 when I was without a boat for approx. one month and for two weeks of that month I was negotiating to buy the Princecraft. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:41:42 UTC-3, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/3/13 9:09 PM, True North wrote: On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:00:15 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote: On 10/3/2013 8:29 PM, True North wrote: Probably less than half the regulars have boats, nor do they have any interest in boating. Too bad there isn't a way to exclude them from polluting the newsgroup. Are you serious? So don, what is the cutoff for boats to count as boats.. Let me guess, 6 inches shorter and ten pounds lighter than your boat, right? I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, or are you just posing as a rich guy until mom's money runs out? I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition. Is it in "several" pieces at this time? Too bad you didn't take care of it. Is that the one that rotted into splinters? I guess he didn't think much of his own craftsmanship. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/3/2013 10:54 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:24:57 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote: On 10/3/2013 9:09 PM, True North wrote: I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and harry off the group too, Don, answer the question... I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition. I didn't.. Is it in "several" pieces at this time? Too bad you didn't take care of it. Thanks for your concern, but I had other more pressing issues than a plywood boat, I was not using... You didn't have a boat for a while, and you didn't leave the group, are you just a hypocrite? Rhetorical question..... Again you show your utter stupidity... When you can post like an adult, I will consider your query... |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/3/2013 10:55 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:41:42 UTC-3, F.O.A.D. wrote: Is that the one that rotted into splinters? I guess he didn't think much of his own craftsmanship. So, did you stop posting don, when you didn't have a boat, do you support harry and dick posting now since you "now" feel having a boat should be a requirement to post here? Or are you a hypocrite? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......
that would be you and your boatless enablers. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
In article , jrags says...
I was under the impression that this site was about boats. I looks more like a **** and moan page to me. I think that there are more fitting places to express venom. Please keep it to BOATS Sure Jawbone. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:
I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:
I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. So, you have launched three troll posts off of this one post so far... I don't expect you and harry to be able to keep up.. and I don't expect your enablers to say anything.... |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. There you go again, 5 trollish name calling posts, off one post...... snerk |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. By whom? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 10:27 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote: On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. By whom? BFF? Drama?. What's next, naming our wives and suggesting folks call our workplaces and harass them? Because you personally have suggested folks call wives and workplaces of Jim and I for starters... Why can't you just post like an adult here, if *you* alone would do that, I'm sure something can be done. Remember, the ONLY times any of this has gone beyond talk on usenet, to real in real life situations, or brought in real life to family members outside the group. It has been your side, against "conservativs" and their families....Women have been physically stalked right to their docks, posters have been physically chased down and called out from their home towns (that was you)... You personally don have called for at least three wives her (called them directly by their first names) and listed our work places... then suggested "someone" should call our wives directly, and say something. Then all of a sudden when it happened to John... well, you know... All of these things have come from "your side" and been directed at "conservatives" and their families.... You and harry are the ones who have actually taken it off list into real life. Everything else has just been talk and threats, and other bull****..... Anyone who can refute any of that, go ahead..... or you can just call names and try to make us all forget what we all know "you" did..... |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/13 10:48 AM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/4/2013 10:27 AM, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote: On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. By whom? BFF? Drama?. What's next, naming our wives and suggesting folks call our workplaces and harass them? Because you personally have suggested folks call wives and workplaces of Jim and I for starters... Why can't you just post like an adult here, if *you* alone would do that, I'm sure something can be done. Remember, the ONLY times any of this has gone beyond talk on usenet, to real in real life situations, or brought in real life to family members outside the group. It has been your side, against "conservativs" and their families....Women have been physically stalked right to their docks, posters have been physically chased down and called out from their home towns (that was you)... You personally don have called for at least three wives her (called them directly by their first names) and listed our work places... then suggested "someone" should call our wives directly, and say something. Then all of a sudden when it happened to John... well, you know... All of these things have come from "your side" and been directed at "conservatives" and their families.... You and harry are the ones who have actually taken it off list into real life. Everything else has just been talk and threats, and other bull****..... Anyone who can refute any of that, go ahead..... or you can just call names and try to make us all forget what we all know "you" did..... I doubt anyone wants to get into the pile of crap you continue to shovel in here. Why don't you just stop? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Friday, October 4, 2013 10:54:22 AM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
On 10/4/13 10:48 AM, Charlemagne wrote: On 10/4/2013 10:27 AM, Hank� wrote: On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote: On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank� wrote: On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. By whom? BFF? Drama?. What's next, naming our wives and suggesting folks call our workplaces and harass them? Because you personally have suggested folks call wives and workplaces of Jim and I for starters... Why can't you just post like an adult here, if *you* alone would do that, I'm sure something can be done. Remember, the ONLY times any of this has gone beyond talk on usenet, to real in real life situations, or brought in real life to family members outside the group. It has been your side, against "conservativs" and their families....Women have been physically stalked right to their docks, posters have been physically chased down and called out from their home towns (that was you)... You personally don have called for at least three wives her (called them directly by their first names) and listed our work places... then suggested "someone" should call our wives directly, and say something. Then all of a sudden when it happened to John... well, you know... All of these things have come from "your side" and been directed at "conservatives" and their families.... You and harry are the ones who have actually taken it off list into real life. Everything else has just been talk and threats, and other bull****..... Anyone who can refute any of that, go ahead..... or you can just call names and try to make us all forget what we all know "you" did..... I doubt anyone wants to get into the pile of crap you continue to shovel in here. Why don't you just stop? I have stopped.. Stopped calling names, waiting for don and harry to do the same.... But thanks for your input:) |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 10:48 AM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/4/2013 10:27 AM, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote: On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task? When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done. By whom? BFF? Drama?. What's next, naming our wives and suggesting folks call our workplaces and harass them? Because you personally have suggested folks call wives and workplaces of Jim and I for starters... Why can't you just post like an adult here, if *you* alone would do that, I'm sure something can be done. Remember, the ONLY times any of this has gone beyond talk on usenet, to real in real life situations, or brought in real life to family members outside the group. It has been your side, against "conservativs" and their families....Women have been physically stalked right to their docks, posters have been physically chased down and called out from their home towns (that was you)... You personally don have called for at least three wives her (called them directly by their first names) and listed our work places... then suggested "someone" should call our wives directly, and say something. Then all of a sudden when it happened to John... well, you know... All of these things have come from "your side" and been directed at "conservatives" and their families.... You and harry are the ones who have actually taken it off list into real life. Everything else has just been talk and threats, and other bull****..... Anyone who can refute any of that, go ahead..... or you can just call names and try to make us all forget what we all know "you" did..... Seriously now, how can anyone forget the stranger than fiction story of Harry's life, that he, himself, painted for us? |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
Wait a minute, Snottie.
Are you saying that Margaret is Kruger's wife? Whatever I did say was for your own good. The hope was that someone close could monitor your activities and seek professional help when your criminally insanity got the better of you. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
The problem is Snottie continually gets confused and doesn't know who he's talking to or about from one day to the next.
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 12:23 PM, True North wrote:
The problem is Snottie "Snotty" huh... You just can't do it, can you? The problem is still you. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 12:20 PM, True North wrote:
Wait a minute, Snottie. Are you saying that Margaret is Kruger's wife? Whatever I did say was for your own good. The hope was that someone close could monitor your activities and seek professional help when your criminally insanity got the better of you. Ok, ten unanswered trolls from you today... |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
|
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Friday, 4 October 2013 13:53:16 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... Wait a minute, Snottie. Are you saying that Margaret is Kruger's wife? Whatever I did say was for your own good. The hope was that someone close could monitor your activities and seek professional help when your criminally insanity got the better of you. That Jawbone Scotty sure is one crazy dude!!! Crazy as a bedbug! I was answering his post and he accuses me of another "unanswered troll". I feel like I'm playing with a mentally challenged misfit. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On Friday, 4 October 2013 13:50:13 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote: I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go...... that would be you and your boatless enablers. So, you have launched three troll posts off of this one post so far... I don't expect you and harry to be able to keep up.. and I don't expect your enablers to say anything.... Man, it will almost be a good thing when you get out of this whiney, crybaby phase and back to your vulgar, nasty low life self. Hard to say which phase of him is worse. Sure wish we had a big red button to press and shock him... in an attempt to control his insane behavior. |
Bull S_ _ _ Banter
On 10/4/2013 1:18 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 13:53:16 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Wait a minute, Snottie. Are you saying that Margaret is Kruger's wife? Whatever I did say was for your own good. The hope was that someone close could monitor your activities and seek professional help when your criminally insanity got the better of you. That Jawbone Scotty sure is one crazy dude!!! Crazy as a bedbug! I was answering his post and he accuses me of another "unanswered troll". I feel like I'm playing with a mentally challenged misfit. 12, get help... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com