On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:41:42 UTC-3, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/3/13 9:09 PM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:00:15 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

On 10/3/2013 8:29 PM, True North wrote:



Probably less than half the regulars have boats, nor do they have any interest in boating.



Too bad there isn't a way to exclude them from polluting the newsgroup.











Are you serious? So don, what is the cutoff for boats to count as



boats.. Let me guess, 6 inches shorter and ten pounds lighter than your



boat, right?







I have several boats, I can prove it.... At the same time both of your



closest enablers don't right now.. So, are you gonna' kick dick and



harry off the group too, or are you just posing as a rich guy until



mom's money runs out?





I don't think you can count that Brockway skiff in it's current unseaworthy condition.

Is it in "several" pieces at this time?

Too bad you didn't take care of it.





Is that the one that rotted into splinters?


I guess he didn't think much of his own craftsmanship.

On 10/3/2013 10:55 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2013 22:41:42 UTC-3, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Is that the one that rotted into splinters?


I guess he didn't think much of his own craftsmanship.


So, did you stop posting don, when you didn't have a boat, do you
support harry and dick posting now since you "now" feel having a boat
should be a requirement to post here? Or are you a hypocrite?

I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......
that would be you and your boatless enablers.

On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:
I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......
that would be you and your boatless enablers.


Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task?

On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:

I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......

that would be you and your boatless enablers.





Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task?

When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done.

On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:

I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......

that would be you and your boatless enablers.





Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task?

When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done.


There you go again, 5 trollish name calling posts, off one post......
snerk

In article , says...

On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:

I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......

that would be you and your boatless enablers.





Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task?

When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done.


There you go again, 5 trollish name calling posts, off one post......
snerk

There YOU go again.

On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:

I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......

that would be you and your boatless enablers.





Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task?

When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be done.


By whom?

On 10/4/2013 10:27 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 9:08 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:47:45 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:

I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how
things go......

that would be you and your boatless enablers.





Who is we, and how do you propose to accomplish the task?

When all fair minded posters in this newsgroup tire of the constant
drama of your BFF and your enabling of it, I'm sure something can be
done.


By whom?


BFF? Drama?. What's next, naming our wives and suggesting folks call
our workplaces and harass them? Because you personally have suggested
folks call wives and workplaces of Jim and I for starters... Why can't
you just post like an adult here, if *you* alone would do that, I'm sure
something can be done.

Remember, the ONLY times any of this has gone beyond talk on usenet, to
real in real life situations, or brought in real life to family members
outside the group. It has been your side, against "conservativs" and
their families....Women have been physically stalked right to their
docks, posters have been physically chased down and called out from
their home towns (that was you)... You personally don have called for at
least three wives her (called them directly by their first names) and
listed our work places... then suggested "someone" should call our wives
directly, and say something. Then all of a sudden when it happened to
John... well, you know...

All of these things have come from "your side" and been directed at
"conservatives" and their families.... You and harry are the ones who
have actually taken it off list into real life. Everything else has just
been talk and threats, and other bull****.....

Anyone who can refute any of that, go ahead..... or you can just call
names and try to make us all forget what we all know "you" did.....

On 10/4/2013 7:19 AM, True North wrote:
I say we get rid of the flotsam and jetsam first and then see how things go......
that would be you and your boatless enablers.


So, you have launched three troll posts off of this one post so far... I
don't expect you and harry to be able to keep up.. and I don't expect
your enablers to say anything....