sooo
 

On 9/29/2013 3:10 PM, True North wrote:
On Sunday, 29 September 2013 14:16:26 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 9/29/2013 12:24 PM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:41:21 -0400, wrote:



On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:32:43 -0400, Hank©

wrote:



On 9/29/2013 8:44 AM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 00:56:57 -0400, wrote:



On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:00:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



We can start by reducing military expenditures by 10% a year until they

are half what they are now, and then consider additional reductions in

military spending.



I agree with the sentiment but this is the biggest single jobs program

in the US.

That is why they have so much trouble cutting the DoD. They are smart

about spreading the spending around, hitting the district of every

powerful congressman in the country.

You certainly have plenty in your district



I would have no problem with cuts in the military and like cuts in welfare (including unemployment

compensation)...with the guarantee that the savings pay off the debt and/or go to infrastructure

rebuilding - making jobs for those whose welfare checks are being reduced. Perhaps they'd be more

inclined to look for a job.





Some time ago there was much hype about a program called workfare.

Whatever became of that? It probably wasn't too popular amongst O'Bama's

base.



That was part of that "cut food stamps" bill. Some of the savings (not

really cuts) was that able bodied people needed to work for their food

stamps.



Holy ****! That's asking way too much of folks who can't afford to eat vegetables nor get an ID
card.



Well, work IS a four letter word. No self respecting public assistance

groupie is going to be tricked into earning his keep.

Quit picking on your little buddy from CT.
If too many of us do it, he'll get his dander up and not be receptive to the message.



Lucky you didn't show up coward.... I was going to pound you
unconscious, then turn your kneecaps to pudding. The boys were there to
make sure nobody pulled me off, and the other punk didn't show up with
his 9mm courage.... LOL... Nothing you say here about anyone counts
anymore, now that we know you are no better than harry at backing up
your threats.... What a ****ing punk....

sooo
 

On Sunday, September 29, 2013 10:05:23 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Which entitlements would you cut, and by how much?

Asshole Krause asking for a reply he can insult....

**** OFF KRAUSE.

sooo
 

On Sunday, September 29, 2013 3:10:50 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:

Quit picking on your little buddy from CT.

If too many of us do it, he'll get his dander up and not be receptive to the message.

Then shut YOUR old wrinkled mouth..ASSWIPE !!

sooo
 

On 9/29/13 10:55 PM, FirstOrLast wrote:

Lucky you didn't show up coward.... I was going to pound you
unconscious, then turn your kneecaps to pudding. The boys were there to
make sure nobody pulled me off, and the other punk didn't show up with
his 9mm courage.... LOL... Nothing you say here about anyone counts
anymore, now that we know you are no better than harry at backing up
your threats.... What a ****ing punk....


Wow. Classic PsychoSnotty, aided and abetted by drugs and booze.

sooo
 

On 9/30/2013 8:18 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 9/29/13 10:55 PM, FirstOrLast wrote:

Lucky you didn't show up coward.... I was going to pound you
unconscious, then turn your kneecaps to pudding. The boys were there to
make sure nobody pulled me off, and the other punk didn't show up with
his 9mm courage.... LOL... Nothing you say here about anyone counts
anymore, now that we know you are no better than harry at backing up
your threats.... What a ****ing punk....


Wow. Classic PsychoSnotty, aided and abetted by drugs and booze.

Are you going to let him talk to your little buddy in that tone?

sooo
 

In article , says...

On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 12:06:05 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:49:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Oh, and you have no idea what the job of a U.S. Senator is.

I'm not even sure I know what the job of Senator is these days. It
seems to be to run for president.

Cruz is "Dancing with the ones who brung him" and pandering to that
base. No shock there.
That seems to be the pattern.
I am not sure he is any more dangerous than the neocons who want to
drag us into a war in the middle east and they are democrats as much
as republican.
.

Repeal the 17th amendment and make the Senators responsive to their States legislatures.

The Texas legislature probably approves of Cruz.

Let the cards fall where they may, the Senators should be representatives of their States and
not Representatives of national organizations.