![]() |
|
Greg, speaking of following the money...
On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) |
Greg, speaking of following the money...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 17:14:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/7/13 4:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 9/7/13 4:03 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:24:36 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: I bought a 2 terabyte portable drive for all of my work and financial files, etc. I also have a solid state seagate for daily backup. 2 terabytes? They could run the New York Stock Exchange with less DASD than that. ;-) We keep and use old files from several years ago. Some design files are 30 gigs or so. Add to that files from others on the design teams, plus spreadsheets, correspondence, and on and on. I have four two terabyte drives in my server, with one of those drives running a compressed backup of what is on the other three drives. I think I about two terabytes of data on the server which consists of backups of the three computers in the house, folders for archives, about 750 GB of movies, et cetera. I do nightly backups of my desktop, plus weekly backups of my wife's computer and my laptop. I also run an apple Time Machine backup of my desktop computer to a separate external one terabyte drive. ---------------------------- Pull the plug and you have nothing. Also have a 17KW generator and a buried 500 gallon LP gas tank. :) ...and a Maryland red barn, and two owls in a tree down by the creek, and a twin-diesel, Volvo powered trawler to keep up with Wayne, and a well-ridden Ducati motorcycle, and a printer from WalMart. What more could a guy want? John (Gun Nut) H. A five year old grandkid that speaks four or five languagest, or course. |
Greg, speaking of following the money...
On 9/8/13 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 17:14:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/7/13 4:53 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 9/7/13 4:03 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 13:24:36 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: I bought a 2 terabyte portable drive for all of my work and financial files, etc. I also have a solid state seagate for daily backup. 2 terabytes? They could run the New York Stock Exchange with less DASD than that. ;-) We keep and use old files from several years ago. Some design files are 30 gigs or so. Add to that files from others on the design teams, plus spreadsheets, correspondence, and on and on. I have four two terabyte drives in my server, with one of those drives running a compressed backup of what is on the other three drives. I think I about two terabytes of data on the server which consists of backups of the three computers in the house, folders for archives, about 750 GB of movies, et cetera. I do nightly backups of my desktop, plus weekly backups of my wife's computer and my laptop. I also run an apple Time Machine backup of my desktop computer to a separate external one terabyte drive. ---------------------------- Pull the plug and you have nothing. Also have a 17KW generator and a buried 500 gallon LP gas tank. :) ...and a Maryland red barn, and two owls in a tree down by the creek, and a twin-diesel, Volvo powered trawler to keep up with Wayne, and a well-ridden Ducati motorcycle, and a printer from WalMart. What more could a guy want? John (Gun Nut) H. A five year old grandkid that speaks four or five languagest, or course. Mine speaks the three languages spoken in his home. We're not genetic Ingerfools, after all. |
Greg, speaking of following the money...
On 9/8/13 12:21 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. That sort of sounds like the description I sort of read and sort of understood on the synology site. I think. :) Oh...the cheapo Seagate drive in my iMac was replaced with an apple-branded drive (shows up as an apple branded drive) that allegedly is a twice the price Hitachi Ultrastar drive that is "enterprise-rated" for servers. That from a fellow on one of the apple forums who had a similar problem and whose drive was replaced by one with the same apple description and model number. If apple updates the iMac substantially this fall or in 2014, I'll sell this one and get the upgrade, especially if it has a large capacity SSD instead of the combo apple now is using in the latest iMacs. |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
In article ,
says... On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) Wow, this from the alleged purveyor of technical support..... |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On 9/8/13 1:46 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) Wow, this from the alleged purveyor of technical support..... The problem with not backing up operating systems and programs is that it takes a hell of a lot of time and attention to reinstall them. When I got my iMac with the new HD in it yesterday, I ran a "Time Machine" restore, went out for lunch, and when I came back an hour and a half later, the new HD was up and running with all the contents it had on it, just as it was the day before I took the iMac up to the apple store. All I had to do was type in my system password. |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On Sunday, 8 September 2013 14:46:25 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) Wow, this from the alleged purveyor of technical support..... ~~ SNERK ~~ Oh boy.. his former customers didn't realize what shaky ground they stood on. |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On 9/8/13 2:22 PM, True North wrote:
On Sunday, 8 September 2013 14:46:25 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) Wow, this from the alleged purveyor of technical support..... ~~ SNERK ~~ Oh boy.. his former customers didn't realize what shaky ground they stood on. Maybe they did. |
Greg, speaking of following the money...
On 9/8/13 12:21 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) Greg: here's an interesting screen cap, a maintenance routine the server runs periodically: http://tinyurl.com/q8qjoju |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On 9/8/2013 10:56 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 12:39:11 -0400, skin a cat wrote: On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) I guess if you don't have a lot of stuff, rebuilding the system from scratch is not that bad but I have a lot of things running and configuring all the apps is a PITA. You may not even realize you forgot to load one until you try to use it. On a windoze system you should have a C: drive image that is not too old, even if you do have RAID. I am still pretty unimpressed with Windoze backup. Yeah, I run about a dozen or so programs but I will take a week or two to rebuild when I do. |
Greg, speaking of following the money...
On 9/8/13 11:11 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 12:33:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 12:21 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:18:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/8/13 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:03:19 -0400, Earl wrote: wrote: On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 16:15:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Why not RAID them? With 4 drives you can set up a fairly high efficiency array and have a soft failure of any single drive. With some controllers you don't even need to bring the system down to swap out the bad drive. The whole thing is invisible to the OS. SATA hardware itself is hot swap capable. He can't afford to pay his taxes. Do you really think he can afford a $1500 Raid controller? $1500? More like $40 and most SATA controllers support RAID. You may have to pay a little more for RAID 5 but not much My little server is running under RAID. Something called Synology Hybrid RAID (SHR) with data protection of 1 disk fault-tolerance. I'm not sure what the hell that means, actually. :) That does sort of look like RAID 5. Is that "backup" drive actually just the conglomerate "wasted" drive in a RAID array? Basically RAID 5 writes "stripes" across all of the drives in the array and the way they are laid out, you have one more drive than the amount of data you can store. When you lose one, the data can be recovered from the stripes on the other drives. You can hot swap out the bad one and the system will restore the array while you work. That sort of sounds like the description I sort of read and sort of understood on the synology site. I think. :) Oh...the cheapo Seagate drive in my iMac was replaced with an apple-branded drive (shows up as an apple branded drive) that allegedly is a twice the price Hitachi Ultrastar drive that is "enterprise-rated" for servers. That from a fellow on one of the apple forums who had a similar problem and whose drive was replaced by one with the same apple description and model number. If apple updates the iMac substantially this fall or in 2014, I'll sell this one and get the upgrade, especially if it has a large capacity SSD instead of the combo apple now is using in the latest iMacs. I am not sure all of that "enterprise" stuff really means much but Hitachi is a pretty good drive. I still don't really trust any of them. I am also not convinced SSDs last forever. "Cause nothin' lasts forever Like old fords and a natural stone..." |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On 9/8/13 11:31 PM, skin a cat wrote:
On 9/8/2013 10:56 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 12:39:11 -0400, skin a cat wrote: On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) I guess if you don't have a lot of stuff, rebuilding the system from scratch is not that bad but I have a lot of things running and configuring all the apps is a PITA. You may not even realize you forgot to load one until you try to use it. On a windoze system you should have a C: drive image that is not too old, even if you do have RAID. I am still pretty unimpressed with Windoze backup. Yeah, I run about a dozen or so programs but I will take a week or two to rebuild when I do. Well, I suppose if you are unemployed and have nothing else to do, wasting a "week or two" rebuilding the contents of a computer drive is at least something to do, eh? |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
On 9/9/2013 6:42 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 9/8/13 11:31 PM, skin a cat wrote: On 9/8/2013 10:56 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 12:39:11 -0400, skin a cat wrote: On 9/8/2013 12:21 PM, wrote: I am going the other way with mirroring. It is less efficient in drive usage but even if you lose the array, you only lose that block of data. (one drive's worth) I guess I am simple... I have three external drives, all have all of my work and files, don't back up systems and programs, don't steal them, have the install disks and if I have to rebuild I like to start from scratch anyway... I do have one cloud account for two folders of recent artwork and business files too... but I really don't know much about it, I put stuff in, it backs it up at night... Supposed to be always there for me, I sure hope so:) I guess if you don't have a lot of stuff, rebuilding the system from scratch is not that bad but I have a lot of things running and configuring all the apps is a PITA. You may not even realize you forgot to load one until you try to use it. On a windoze system you should have a C: drive image that is not too old, even if you do have RAID. I am still pretty unimpressed with Windoze backup. Yeah, I run about a dozen or so programs but I will take a week or two to rebuild when I do. Well, I suppose if you are unemployed and have nothing else to do, wasting a "week or two" rebuilding the contents of a computer drive is at least something to do, eh? Rebuilding clears the registry and gets rid of other nasty boogers that contaminate Windows. |
Greg, speaking of following the money..
|
Greg, speaking of following the money..
|
Greg, speaking of following the money..
In article , says...
On 9/9/13 2:29 PM, wrote: On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:58:37 -0400, Hank© wrote: Rebuilding clears the registry and gets rid of other nasty boogers that contaminate Windows. That is true and I do it now and then but I want to do it on my schedule, not at the whim of a bad hard drive. Actually a better plan is to create a drive image of the machine when it is running great and use that as a starting point. I try to keep my C: pretty small so that image is a reasonable size, spinning on my backup. You can use a bootable CD to restore that from the backup. I like Drive Wizard. (Used to be MaxBlast) As long as you have a Seagate or Maxtor drive somewhere in the system it will run. It doesn't even have to be a working drive, it just needs to report. Ahh, the infamous Windoze "Registry." Something I do not miss, along with those inexplicable BSOD. I keep the drive on my iMac around 80% empty. Every program I have, and I have a lot of them, fits within 200 gigabytes, along with all their data. I keep movies, music, large *.PDFs and photos on my little server. It took about 100 minutes Saturday to "restore" the new drive in my iMac and once I invoked the command, there was nothing else I had to do. When I came back to the machine, everything, and I mean everything, was back where it was supposed to be, with all data, passwords, whatever, intact, waiting for me to log in. Unless the Windoze restore procedure has been upgraded, I was never able to do a restore so easily with the Microsoft OS. The last time I had to use a Mac for an every day system I kept an paper clip handy so that I could use it to hardware reset the system two to three times a day. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com