![]() |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:15:33 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
I wonder if Wayne thinks that if government spending for sick people was cut back, there would be more money to waste on his former bankster employer when it finds itself on the ropes again. === Without the global IT infrastructure that our large banks provide, electronic payment systems like credit cards, ATMs, funds transfer, check clearing and international letters of credit would cease operation within seconds. That would make the great recession into a global depression in no time at all, not to mention chaos, misery and social unrest on a massive scale. You should really learn to like the banks. Someday they might even learn to like you again but that's a bit of a stretch. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On 8/29/13 8:08 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:15:33 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I wonder if Wayne thinks that if government spending for sick people was cut back, there would be more money to waste on his former bankster employer when it finds itself on the ropes again. === Without the global IT infrastructure that our large banks provide, electronic payment systems like credit cards, ATMs, funds transfer, check clearing and international letters of credit would cease operation within seconds. That would make the great recession into a global depression in no time at all, not to mention chaos, misery and social unrest on a massive scale. You should really learn to like the banks. Someday they might even learn to like you again but that's a bit of a stretch. Ahhh. Bankster PR bull****. I have good relationships with a couple of banks and a credit union, to the point that when I occasionally walk into the lobby of one them, the branch manager tries to sell me on more services, so she obviously likes me. I turn her down cordially, because she's eliminated fees for me a few times on outgoing wire transfers. I've never been in the lobby of the other bank. I do like the ability to deposit checks from my home office with my iPhone. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On 8/29/13 8:15 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/29/2013 5:09 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 8/29/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:16:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:23:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 1:12 PM, wrote: I believe that is because of the support component that Harry dismisses in such a cavalier way. I don't dismiss support programs for substance abusers. Once again, apparently, you cannot comprehend what you read. What I did say is that the religious-osity, as it were, of 12-step programs, is offputting to a substantial percentage of substance abusers. There is significant published criticism for various reasons of 12-step programs. The hard choices an addict needs to make is the main thing that puts them off. They just use "religious-osity" as one more excuse. Gee, I'm glad you have so much experience dealing with the huge variety of substance abusers and therefore feel qualified to state that those who disdain the 12 steps approach because of religious reasons do so as an excuse. Obviously, whatever your profession was, you chose poorly...since you could have been a first-rate therapist. What is your experience? I'm married to a first-rate psychotherapist who has seen and successfully treated a great number of substance abusers in several settings over her two decades as a licensed practitioner. She sometimes talks about what works and what doesn't for various folks who remain anonymous. Her doctoral dissertation was on a significant aspect of substance abuse, and she has written other papers that also have been published. She consults with NiMH professionals on substance abuse topics. Additionally, I've read "the lit" that comes to the house (professional papers and journals) and I know thought my union work a lot of construction workers in many trades who at some point in their careers suffered severe injuries, were prescribed heavy duty meds, got hooked, and then got clean and stayed clean. As a result, I wouldn't make the sweeping statements you make about substance abusers, or that, as you implied, a large number of those who disdain the 12 step programs because of their religious-osity just do so so they can remain outside of a therapeutic or support service. Meaning you have no first hand experience. My wife is a battery expert, she can build them, analyze them and tell you why they are not performing well. I am just a battery user. And then you have to ask yourself if you believe any of what harry says... Nobody here does, well nobody who thinks for themselves. Ahh, the crazy man re-emerges. How's your blood med level? Lunacy under control for the moment? |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article , says...
On 8/29/13 7:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:17:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: What is your experience? I'm married to a first-rate psychotherapist who has seen and successfully treated a great number of substance abusers in several settings over her two decades as a licensed practitioner. She sometimes talks about what works and what doesn't for various folks who remain anonymous. Her doctoral dissertation was on a significant aspect of substance abuse, and she has written other papers that also have been published. She consults with NiMH professionals on substance abuse topics. NIMH and NIH seem to have a paucity of data online about their success rates. Are you just going to counter my anecdotes with your wife's anecdotes? Additionally, I've read "the lit" that comes to the house (professional papers and journals) and I know thought my union work a lot of construction workers in many trades who at some point in their careers suffered severe injuries, were prescribed heavy duty meds, got hooked, and then got clean and stayed clean. There is a difference between a person who took a course of pain killer drugs adjunct to an injury or an operation who was clinically addicted and someone who simply chose to use drugs and is chronically addicted. In spite of that I still refuse pain pills. As a result, I wouldn't make the sweeping statements you make about substance abusers, or that, as you implied, a large number of those who disdain the 12 step programs because of their religious-osity just do so so they can remain outside of a therapeutic or support service. They do so because it is largely a volunteer effort without all of the credentials a medical program requires, yet they still seem to have similar long term outcomes. Again, if you can find data, we can read it together. I looked on the various NIH/CHC and government drug abuse sites for several hours and "outcome" studies are very rare. You might have more success with a university search system, a paid or the LC search system. My wife used all three to gather the papers needed for her disseration. My wife has sent people to 12-step programs *after* they have been through professional detox and therapy programs, and she has talked about better outcomes for some patients on buprenorphine instead of methadone, but such is way over my pay grade of understanding. Yet your wife can prescribe anything. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:17:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
I do like the ability to deposit checks from my home office with my iPhone. === That transaction is almost certainly being processed in some way through one of the big NYC banks. They invented the infrastructure and continue to maintain it. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
|
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 7:05:36 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/28/13 11:57 PM, wrote: On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:40:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/28/13 5:35 PM, wrote: OK your turn. Show me some peer reviewed studies about the 10 year success of "rehab". I'm sure you can do your own lit search. Have at it. I have not found any reliable study that says any significant number of substance abusers come out of rehab, therapy or any or any other program with a 10 year success rate. There are a few people selling rehab who say they have amazing success rates but they are selling something, not doing research. It was your contention I was wrong. Prove it. I would accept 25% as a win for you if it was a real study that actually tracked patients for any significant amount of time. (not just people who stopped coming back) I only have to look at the half million or more addicted homeless to see all is not going well in paradise. That does not include those dis functionals who are living with friends or family. Then you have the addicts who are working at some level of functionality and the high functioning addicts. Once again, you are exhibiting an inability to think abstractly. Drug addiction is not an illness like, oh, the usual childhood diseases that can be prevented by an inoculation or that caught once, tend not to haunt you again. Drug addiction treatment, once administered, does not mean the individual who receives it has lifetime or even 10-year protection from a relapse. Drug addiction is a chronic disease, and it can be managed properly and successfully. But relapses are more than possible, as they are with other chronic medical illnesses, such as asthma or hypertension. And because there are strong possibilities of relapses with drug addiction doesn't mean treatment is a failure. As with other chronic illnesses, treatment for drug addiction necessitates lifetime evaluation and perhaps modifications when necessary. If you suffer from diabetes, proper treatment can help you get it under control and most of the symptoms will disappear, and the treatment is successful. What happens if you discontinue treatment for your chronic disease? It probably returns and you have a relapse. When a drug addict relapses, it doesn't necessarily mean the treatment he is receiving (or ignoring) has failed. It may just mean the treatment needs to be re-started or changed. Many people with certain mental/emotional illnesses get relief with a combination of medications and therapy that help them feel better and regain control of their lives. Some of those illnesses will require patients to take medications for the rest of their lives. After a while on meds, though, some patients talk themselves into believing they are "cured," so they stop the medications. So, what happens? In many cases the symptoms of the mental/emotional illness returns. Oh, and once again, 12-step programs are not treatment…they provide support. You are an english major, and as such, are not qualifified to make any statements concerning this subject. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
|
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:40:13 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
And I may add, the assholes that said Oh, if so and so wanted to quit (insert what drug here) they could! That of course is horse****, I've watched it with my own eyes. Obviously when looking in a mirror. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:55:14 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I don't believe calling someone who is having success at controlling a substance abuse problem a "junkie" adds anything to the discussion. Why are you here then, greasy??? |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:38:46 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , http://tinyurl.com/6ddknwj Not a 'Dip**** Test' either. John (Gun Nut) H. Wow, I looked the whole thing over and didn't see any mention of a "God". Could you point that out, please? The Higgs Boson was not there ;-) snerk |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:43:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 2:35 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:31:08 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:12:24 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/28/13 11:22 AM, wrote: The religious underpinnings and overlay of 12-step programs are off-putting for many addicts. A lot of people simply don't want religion shoved down their throats. There's a lot of substance/alcohol abusers who while in the `12-step' programs , follow the religious overtones closely. --------------------- Last year when I was involved with a family member's rehab and first steps with recovery I got a copy of the "Big Book" to read what the 12 step thing was all about. I had never heard of the "Big Book" and had only heard about the "12 step program" in the form of jokes. I had no clue what they actually were. Pretty naïve I guess for a guy my age. I confess that I didn't read the Big Book cover to cover, but I read enough to get the history, ideas and concepts. I didn't think it overly pushes religion at all, and certainly doesn't push any particular theology. I got the it really doesn't care what you believe in as long as you acknowledge that there are bigger things in the universe than yourselves. I was also fortunate to have several people who I had met (mostly through the guitar shop) who confided their status as recovering addicts to me. Prior to that I had no idea. They helped me and my wife deal with my family member's addiction and explained their respective adaptations of and implementation of the 12 step program as it applied to them . Some took it more literally than others, but it seemed to benefit them all. I certainly don't think it "shoves" religion down anyone's throats. AA pushes the concept of a 'higher power', which may be different for different folks. The higher power may be God, for those who believe, or it may be peer pressure from the group, or maybe just a 'big brother'. One thing is for sure, the success of AA groups does not put a lot of money into the pockets of psychologists. However, many hospitals for those needing psychological treatment also have an AA group on the premises. (That is also true for many military hospitals.) John (Gun Nut) H. Okay, Bill W. I wonder if Herring still attends AA meetings. Whether I did, do, or will - what business is it of yours? John (Gun Nut) H. This from the asshole who, when I stated that AA was big in prison wanted to know if it was "personal experience"..... |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On 8/29/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:16:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:23:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 1:12 PM, wrote: I believe that is because of the support component that Harry dismisses in such a cavalier way. I don't dismiss support programs for substance abusers. Once again, apparently, you cannot comprehend what you read. What I did say is that the religious-osity, as it were, of 12-step programs, is offputting to a substantial percentage of substance abusers. There is significant published criticism for various reasons of 12-step programs. The hard choices an addict needs to make is the main thing that puts them off. They just use "religious-osity" as one more excuse. Gee, I'm glad you have so much experience dealing with the huge variety of substance abusers and therefore feel qualified to state that those who disdain the 12 steps approach because of religious reasons do so as an excuse. Obviously, whatever your profession was, you chose poorly...since you could have been a first-rate therapist. What is your experience? I'm married to a first-rate psychotherapist who has seen and successfully treated a great number of substance abusers in several settings over her two decades as a licensed practitioner. She sometimes talks about what works and what doesn't for various folks who remain anonymous. Her doctoral dissertation was on a significant aspect of substance abuse, and she has written other papers that also have been published. She consults with NiMH professionals on substance abuse topics. Additionally, I've read "the lit" that comes to the house (professional papers and journals) and I know thought my union work a lot of construction workers in many trades who at some point in their careers suffered severe injuries, were prescribed heavy duty meds, got hooked, and then got clean and stayed clean. As a result, I wouldn't make the sweeping statements you make about substance abusers, or that, as you implied, a large number of those who disdain the 12 step programs because of their religious-osity just do so so they can remain outside of a therapeutic or support service. Do you mean the bricklayer's union rep? |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On 8/29/13 8:15 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 8/29/2013 5:09 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 8/29/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:16:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:23:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 1:12 PM, wrote: I believe that is because of the support component that Harry dismisses in such a cavalier way. I don't dismiss support programs for substance abusers. Once again, apparently, you cannot comprehend what you read. What I did say is that the religious-osity, as it were, of 12-step programs, is offputting to a substantial percentage of substance abusers. There is significant published criticism for various reasons of 12-step programs. The hard choices an addict needs to make is the main thing that puts them off. They just use "religious-osity" as one more excuse. Gee, I'm glad you have so much experience dealing with the huge variety of substance abusers and therefore feel qualified to state that those who disdain the 12 steps approach because of religious reasons do so as an excuse. Obviously, whatever your profession was, you chose poorly...since you could have been a first-rate therapist. What is your experience? I'm married to a first-rate psychotherapist who has seen and successfully treated a great number of substance abusers in several settings over her two decades as a licensed practitioner. She sometimes talks about what works and what doesn't for various folks who remain anonymous. Her doctoral dissertation was on a significant aspect of substance abuse, and she has written other papers that also have been published. She consults with NiMH professionals on substance abuse topics. Additionally, I've read "the lit" that comes to the house (professional papers and journals) and I know thought my union work a lot of construction workers in many trades who at some point in their careers suffered severe injuries, were prescribed heavy duty meds, got hooked, and then got clean and stayed clean. As a result, I wouldn't make the sweeping statements you make about substance abusers, or that, as you implied, a large number of those who disdain the 12 step programs because of their religious-osity just do so so they can remain outside of a therapeutic or support service. Meaning you have no first hand experience. My wife is a battery expert, she can build them, analyze them and tell you why they are not performing well. I am just a battery user. And then you have to ask yourself if you believe any of what harry says... Nobody here does, well nobody who thinks for themselves. Ahh, the crazy man re-emerges. How's your blood med level? Lunacy under control for the moment? Until his jawbone gets out of whack! |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On 8/30/13 9:09 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 8/29/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:16:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:23:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 1:12 PM, wrote: I believe that is because of the support component that Harry dismisses in such a cavalier way. I don't dismiss support programs for substance abusers. Once again, apparently, you cannot comprehend what you read. What I did say is that the religious-osity, as it were, of 12-step programs, is offputting to a substantial percentage of substance abusers. There is significant published criticism for various reasons of 12-step programs. The hard choices an addict needs to make is the main thing that puts them off. They just use "religious-osity" as one more excuse. Gee, I'm glad you have so much experience dealing with the huge variety of substance abusers and therefore feel qualified to state that those who disdain the 12 steps approach because of religious reasons do so as an excuse. Obviously, whatever your profession was, you chose poorly...since you could have been a first-rate therapist. What is your experience? I'm married to a first-rate psychotherapist who has seen and successfully treated a great number of substance abusers in several settings over her two decades as a licensed practitioner. She sometimes talks about what works and what doesn't for various folks who remain anonymous. Her doctoral dissertation was on a significant aspect of substance abuse, and she has written other papers that also have been published. She consults with NiMH professionals on substance abuse topics. Additionally, I've read "the lit" that comes to the house (professional papers and journals) and I know thought my union work a lot of construction workers in many trades who at some point in their careers suffered severe injuries, were prescribed heavy duty meds, got hooked, and then got clean and stayed clean. As a result, I wouldn't make the sweeping statements you make about substance abusers, or that, as you implied, a large number of those who disdain the 12 step programs because of their religious-osity just do so so they can remain outside of a therapeutic or support service. Do you mean the bricklayer's union rep? You just can't help yourself, eh? |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On 8/30/13 9:09 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 8/29/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:16:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 3:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:23:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 1:12 PM, wrote: I believe that is because of the support component that Harry dismisses in such a cavalier way. I don't dismiss support programs for substance abusers. Once again, apparently, you cannot comprehend what you read. What I did say is that the religious-osity, as it were, of 12-step programs, is offputting to a substantial percentage of substance abusers. There is significant published criticism for various reasons of 12-step programs. The hard choices an addict needs to make is the main thing that puts them off. They just use "religious-osity" as one more excuse. Gee, I'm glad you have so much experience dealing with the huge variety of substance abusers and therefore feel qualified to state that those who disdain the 12 steps approach because of religious reasons do so as an excuse. Obviously, whatever your profession was, you chose poorly...since you could have been a first-rate therapist. What is your experience? I'm married to a first-rate psychotherapist who has seen and successfully treated a great number of substance abusers in several settings over her two decades as a licensed practitioner. She sometimes talks about what works and what doesn't for various folks who remain anonymous. Her doctoral dissertation was on a significant aspect of substance abuse, and she has written other papers that also have been published. She consults with NiMH professionals on substance abuse topics. Additionally, I've read "the lit" that comes to the house (professional papers and journals) and I know thought my union work a lot of construction workers in many trades who at some point in their careers suffered severe injuries, were prescribed heavy duty meds, got hooked, and then got clean and stayed clean. As a result, I wouldn't make the sweeping statements you make about substance abusers, or that, as you implied, a large number of those who disdain the 12 step programs because of their religious-osity just do so so they can remain outside of a therapeutic or support service. Do you mean the bricklayer's union rep? You just can't help yourself, eh? No, I really can't help but think about the truth. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? Does the name-calling boost your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:08:57 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:18:57 -0400, John H wrote: At some point in the pain pill taking process, the taker knows he's taking the pills for something other than pain relief. At that point the taker makes a decision to cut down or continue. Yeah, it can be hard. John (Gun Nut) H. Pain management for a one shot procedure should be like a prednisone pack. A tapered dose that runs out in a few days. They both end up making you fatter. That's why God invented golf. Or was it just Scots he invented. I don't know. I do know if I hadn't shot an 8 on number 18 at Forest Greens today I'd have been in the 80's, which would have pleased me bunches! John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:08:23 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:43:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 2:35 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:31:08 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:12:24 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/28/13 11:22 AM, wrote: The religious underpinnings and overlay of 12-step programs are off-putting for many addicts. A lot of people simply don't want religion shoved down their throats. There's a lot of substance/alcohol abusers who while in the `12-step' programs , follow the religious overtones closely. --------------------- Last year when I was involved with a family member's rehab and first steps with recovery I got a copy of the "Big Book" to read what the 12 step thing was all about. I had never heard of the "Big Book" and had only heard about the "12 step program" in the form of jokes. I had no clue what they actually were. Pretty naïve I guess for a guy my age. I confess that I didn't read the Big Book cover to cover, but I read enough to get the history, ideas and concepts. I didn't think it overly pushes religion at all, and certainly doesn't push any particular theology. I got the it really doesn't care what you believe in as long as you acknowledge that there are bigger things in the universe than yourselves. I was also fortunate to have several people who I had met (mostly through the guitar shop) who confided their status as recovering addicts to me. Prior to that I had no idea. They helped me and my wife deal with my family member's addiction and explained their respective adaptations of and implementation of the 12 step program as it applied to them . Some took it more literally than others, but it seemed to benefit them all. I certainly don't think it "shoves" religion down anyone's throats. AA pushes the concept of a 'higher power', which may be different for different folks. The higher power may be God, for those who believe, or it may be peer pressure from the group, or maybe just a 'big brother'. One thing is for sure, the success of AA groups does not put a lot of money into the pockets of psychologists. However, many hospitals for those needing psychological treatment also have an AA group on the premises. (That is also true for many military hospitals.) John (Gun Nut) H. Okay, Bill W. I wonder if Herring still attends AA meetings. Whether I did, do, or will - what business is it of yours? John (Gun Nut) H. This from the asshole who, when I stated that AA was big in prison wanted to know if it was "personal experience"..... No. I wanted to know if the 'same old, same old' comment was from personal experience. But, you may say what you wish. Does the name-calling help your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? Does the name-calling boost your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. No, name calling doesn't "boost my ego", it states just exactly what you are. You know damned good at well that your ****ty question about "personal experience" was a jab, and the truth is, yes, I have personal experience, and it wasn't pleasant. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:08:57 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:18:57 -0400, John H wrote: At some point in the pain pill taking process, the taker knows he's taking the pills for something other than pain relief. At that point the taker makes a decision to cut down or continue. Yeah, it can be hard. John (Gun Nut) H. Pain management for a one shot procedure should be like a prednisone pack. A tapered dose that runs out in a few days. They both end up making you fatter. That's why God invented golf. Cite? |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:08:23 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:43:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/29/13 2:35 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:31:08 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:12:24 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/28/13 11:22 AM, wrote: The religious underpinnings and overlay of 12-step programs are off-putting for many addicts. A lot of people simply don't want religion shoved down their throats. There's a lot of substance/alcohol abusers who while in the `12-step' programs , follow the religious overtones closely. --------------------- Last year when I was involved with a family member's rehab and first steps with recovery I got a copy of the "Big Book" to read what the 12 step thing was all about. I had never heard of the "Big Book" and had only heard about the "12 step program" in the form of jokes. I had no clue what they actually were. Pretty naïve I guess for a guy my age. I confess that I didn't read the Big Book cover to cover, but I read enough to get the history, ideas and concepts. I didn't think it overly pushes religion at all, and certainly doesn't push any particular theology. I got the it really doesn't care what you believe in as long as you acknowledge that there are bigger things in the universe than yourselves. I was also fortunate to have several people who I had met (mostly through the guitar shop) who confided their status as recovering addicts to me. Prior to that I had no idea. They helped me and my wife deal with my family member's addiction and explained their respective adaptations of and implementation of the 12 step program as it applied to them . Some took it more literally than others, but it seemed to benefit them all. I certainly don't think it "shoves" religion down anyone's throats. AA pushes the concept of a 'higher power', which may be different for different folks. The higher power may be God, for those who believe, or it may be peer pressure from the group, or maybe just a 'big brother'. One thing is for sure, the success of AA groups does not put a lot of money into the pockets of psychologists. However, many hospitals for those needing psychological treatment also have an AA group on the premises. (That is also true for many military hospitals.) John (Gun Nut) H. Okay, Bill W. I wonder if Herring still attends AA meetings. Whether I did, do, or will - what business is it of yours? John (Gun Nut) H. This from the asshole who, when I stated that AA was big in prison wanted to know if it was "personal experience"..... No. I wanted to know if the 'same old, same old' comment was from personal experience. But, you may say what you wish. Does the name-calling help your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. Again, name calling does nothing for my ego, although knowing that you are an asshole helps me steer clear of one more asshole. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:17:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? Does the name-calling boost your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. No, name calling doesn't "boost my ego", it states just exactly what you are. You know damned good at well that your ****ty question about "personal experience" was a jab, and the truth is, yes, I have personal experience, and it wasn't pleasant. Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:17:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:08:57 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:18:57 -0400, John H wrote: At some point in the pain pill taking process, the taker knows he's taking the pills for something other than pain relief. At that point the taker makes a decision to cut down or continue. Yeah, it can be hard. John (Gun Nut) H. Pain management for a one shot procedure should be like a prednisone pack. A tapered dose that runs out in a few days. They both end up making you fatter. That's why God invented golf. Cite? http://rlv.zcache.com/god_created_golf_post_cards-r1bb1de24843a4377ae211a3afa0dd046_vgbaq_8byvr_512. jpg John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
On 8/30/2013 2:58 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? Does the name-calling boost your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. Hummmm.. I wonder if his "relative" was in prison at the same time kevin dissappeared for what, 18 mos here with a mystery disease? ... |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:17:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:08:57 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:18:57 -0400, John H wrote: At some point in the pain pill taking process, the taker knows he's taking the pills for something other than pain relief. At that point the taker makes a decision to cut down or continue. Yeah, it can be hard. John (Gun Nut) H. Pain management for a one shot procedure should be like a prednisone pack. A tapered dose that runs out in a few days. They both end up making you fatter. That's why God invented golf. Cite? http://rlv.zcache.com/god_created_golf_post_cards-r1bb1de24843a4377ae211a3afa0dd046_vgbaq_8byvr_512. jpg John (Gun Nut) H. Oh, you believe cartoons, huh? That explains a lot..... |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:17:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? Does the name-calling boost your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. No, name calling doesn't "boost my ego", it states just exactly what you are. You know damned good at well that your ****ty question about "personal experience" was a jab, and the truth is, yes, I have personal experience, and it wasn't pleasant. Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? John (Gun Nut) H. Oh, man, you have to be the most dense person here! Jawbone Scotty, as insane as he is, can at least sometimes think. http://tinyurl.com/l7d6fnj http://www.thirteen.org/closetohome/...l/relapse.html http://tinyurl.com/lv3fshl Get it now? Somehow, I doubt it. |
Religious Craziness Sends Man Back to Jail
In article ,
says... On 8/30/2013 2:58 PM, John H wrote: On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:07:16 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:42:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... The interesting thing is that the 12 step programs have a higher "success" rate than the institutional or non 12 step programs. I know several people who have been in 12 step programs and they have been sober for 15 and 20 years. They were never institutionalized, they never received "professional" help with their addiction. People have to want to change and forceing them to change or trying to modify their behavior isn't going to succeed. Cite? It is going to be hard. I looked at this for about 4 hours last night. I can find hundreds of articles saying THEIR program works "X"% of the time (with questionable stats) but it is very hard to find any actual studies that track the people in a verifiable case study. Places like CDC and NIH where you would expect this to happen don't seem to be doing it. The studies where they are actually looking at particular therapies seen to show pretty dismal results and the longest term study I saw was that methadone deal. They tried to polish that turd but the numbers expose the truth. Over half the patients were using illegal drugs 18 months in, while still in therapy. 12 step, particularly AA, does seem to work as long as the person stays in the program but a lot of people simply walk away and they still may fall off the wagon occasionally. The question is whether they try to get back on. I have been to a few meetings as a visitor and it is an interesting process. There is a certain religious component but it is far from the main driver of the program. They are really trying to say this is YOUR problem and YOU have to fix it. Then they give you some tools. They don't seem to care which god you want to use if that is the tool you decide on. I think the sponsor relationship might be the best tool. Some of the biggest AA meetings, believe it or not, happen in prison. People there are remorseful, and also they get coffee and cigarettes! So, they go, until they get out, then it's same old same old. Cite? Or personal experience? John (Gun Nut) H. http://tinyurl.com/pxgo9s2 http://www.aa.org/pdf/products/p-26_AAinCF.pdf http://tinyurl.com/oqxat2d http://silkworth.net/bobp/chapter14.html And yes, personal experience. I relative that I've dealt with on their attempts at recovery did prison time. Do you have a problem with that, asshole? Your cites say nothing of 'same old same old' when they get out. Did you bother to read them? Does the name-calling boost your ego? John (Gun Nut) H. Hummmm.. I wonder if his "relative" was in prison at the same time kevin dissappeared for what, 18 mos here with a mystery disease? ... I'm sorry, are you trying to say something? All I read is insane babble from your jawbone. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com