I see some people here actually think that those using
the name "Tea Party" shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand.
That's plain nuts. What, somebody here was "troubled"
when somebody else "dismissed" the "Tea Party?"
Crazy ****.

Plain arrogance to suppose that most people wouldn't do
otherwise.
There is no "Tea Party" except a loose coalition of
crybabies. No platform with detail, just a bare-
bones plan to **** up everything.
Crybabies slamming their hands into their food.

I've always dismissed them, just as I do the
Libertoonians, which might as well be called "Tea Party"
now. The wacko Libertoonians and "Tea Party" have
coalesced.
But I just now understand the truth behind calling them
"Tea Baggers." That's a crude term, used by low-lifes.
When originally used to describe the "Tea Party" it
probably was used to describe the fact that "Tea Party"
"members" would show up at their inane "meetings" with
****ing tea bags stapled all over their persons.
"Teabagger" is still commonly used to describe them.
Only low-lifes take umbrage, because their minds are in
the gutter. Scotty is one of these. He was the first I
saw complaining about the term, and why I now know the
alternate meaning. Thanks for absolutely nothing.

But watching some video game on YouTube I see gamers
teabagging other players they have killed. It's meant to
childishly insult the dead player. Kids doing it mostly.

Then I see Scotty and BAR here obscenely trying to teabag
Eisboch. He's a decent, thoughtful guy, and not playing
a game.
What childish and selfish arrogance. But it looks like
that's what the "Tea Party" and Loonitarians are up to,
and that's their main goal.
Squat over prone Americans and stuff their balls in their
faces.
Too bad for them most Americans don't want any part of
teabagging.

Anyway, **** kids like Scotty and BAR. And **** all the
other teabagging "Tea Party" advocates.
I dismiss them out of hand. They deserve no interaction
with decent people. They're just trash to me.
Their "ideas" have nothing to do with reality.
They won't last long. And unless the GOP squashes them
like the roaches they are, the GOP won't last long
either.

On 8/9/13 12:43 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

I see some people here actually think that those using
the name "Tea Party" shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand.
That's plain nuts. What, somebody here was "troubled"
when somebody else "dismissed" the "Tea Party?"
Crazy ****.

Plain arrogance to suppose that most people wouldn't do
otherwise.
There is no "Tea Party" except a loose coalition of
crybabies. No platform with detail, just a bare-
bones plan to **** up everything.
Crybabies slamming their hands into their food.

I've always dismissed them, just as I do the
Libertoonians, which might as well be called "Tea Party"
now. The wacko Libertoonians and "Tea Party" have
coalesced.
But I just now understand the truth behind calling them
"Tea Baggers." That's a crude term, used by low-lifes.
When originally used to describe the "Tea Party" it
probably was used to describe the fact that "Tea Party"
"members" would show up at their inane "meetings" with
****ing tea bags stapled all over their persons.

"Teabagger" was the term used at least from 2009 as a derogatory
"descriptor" of the Tea Party movement, and for those who first used the
term to describe these crazies, the etymology had nothing to do with tea
bags. It was and is crude, and deliberately so.

The tea party groups were and perhaps still are funded by a few
multimillionaires who like having grass roots crowds of morons who are
easy to manipulate.

The tea party is part and parcel of the modern Republican party. It has
subsumed the GOP, as it were.

In article ,
says...

I see some people here actually think that those using
the name "Tea Party" shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand.
That's plain nuts. What, somebody here was "troubled"
when somebody else "dismissed" the "Tea Party?"
Crazy ****.

Plain arrogance to suppose that most people wouldn't do
otherwise.
There is no "Tea Party" except a loose coalition of
crybabies. No platform with detail, just a bare-
bones plan to **** up everything.
Crybabies slamming their hands into their food.

I've always dismissed them, just as I do the
Libertoonians, which might as well be called "Tea Party"
now. The wacko Libertoonians and "Tea Party" have
coalesced.
But I just now understand the truth behind calling them
"Tea Baggers." That's a crude term, used by low-lifes.
When originally used to describe the "Tea Party" it
probably was used to describe the fact that "Tea Party"
"members" would show up at their inane "meetings" with
****ing tea bags stapled all over their persons.
"Teabagger" is still commonly used to describe them.
Only low-lifes take umbrage, because their minds are in
the gutter. Scotty is one of these. He was the first I
saw complaining about the term, and why I now know the
alternate meaning. Thanks for absolutely nothing.

But watching some video game on YouTube I see gamers
teabagging other players they have killed. It's meant to
childishly insult the dead player. Kids doing it mostly.

Then I see Scotty and BAR here obscenely trying to teabag
Eisboch. He's a decent, thoughtful guy, and not playing
a game.
What childish and selfish arrogance. But it looks like
that's what the "Tea Party" and Loonitarians are up to,
and that's their main goal.
Squat over prone Americans and stuff their balls in their
faces.
Too bad for them most Americans don't want any part of
teabagging.

Anyway, **** kids like Scotty and BAR. And **** all the
other teabagging "Tea Party" advocates.
I dismiss them out of hand. They deserve no interaction
with decent people. They're just trash to me.
Their "ideas" have nothing to do with reality.
They won't last long. And unless the GOP squashes them
like the roaches they are, the GOP won't last long
either.




Do you kiss your wife with that foul mouth of yours?

I am a registered Republican. I just don't believe it is productive to dismiss someones views
because you don't agree with them.

In article ,
says...

On 8/9/2013 5:24 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

I see some people here actually think that those using
the name "Tea Party" shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand.
That's plain nuts. What, somebody here was "troubled"
when somebody else "dismissed" the "Tea Party?"
Crazy ****.

Plain arrogance to suppose that most people wouldn't do
otherwise.
There is no "Tea Party" except a loose coalition of
crybabies. No platform with detail, just a bare-
bones plan to **** up everything.
Crybabies slamming their hands into their food.

I've always dismissed them, just as I do the
Libertoonians, which might as well be called "Tea Party"
now. The wacko Libertoonians and "Tea Party" have
coalesced.
But I just now understand the truth behind calling them
"Tea Baggers." That's a crude term, used by low-lifes.
When originally used to describe the "Tea Party" it
probably was used to describe the fact that "Tea Party"
"members" would show up at their inane "meetings" with
****ing tea bags stapled all over their persons.
"Teabagger" is still commonly used to describe them.
Only low-lifes take umbrage, because their minds are in
the gutter. Scotty is one of these. He was the first I
saw complaining about the term, and why I now know the
alternate meaning. Thanks for absolutely nothing.

But watching some video game on YouTube I see gamers
teabagging other players they have killed. It's meant to
childishly insult the dead player. Kids doing it mostly.

Then I see Scotty and BAR here obscenely trying to teabag
Eisboch. He's a decent, thoughtful guy, and not playing
a game.
What childish and selfish arrogance. But it looks like
that's what the "Tea Party" and Loonitarians are up to,
and that's their main goal.
Squat over prone Americans and stuff their balls in their
faces.
Too bad for them most Americans don't want any part of
teabagging.

Anyway, **** kids like Scotty and BAR. And **** all the
other teabagging "Tea Party" advocates.
I dismiss them out of hand. They deserve no interaction
with decent people. They're just trash to me.
Their "ideas" have nothing to do with reality.
They won't last long. And unless the GOP squashes them
like the roaches they are, the GOP won't last long
either.




Do you kiss your wife with that foul mouth of yours?

I am a registered Republican. I just don't believe it is productive to dismiss someones views
because you don't agree with them.


The Tea Party is only a loose cooalition now because the DNC machine
used every dept and resource available to squash them before the 2010
elections... and ever since. Yesterday a IRS official noted to congress
that the practice is still going on... So, which crazy conspiracy is
that? LOL!

And you want people to think you aren't bat **** crazy! I DO hope you
know that the "practice" to which you speak of has been going on for
decades...... Bet your jawbone and FOX didn't tell you that!