| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#72
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Which...
On 8/6/2013 8:03 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/6/2013 6:56 PM, Hank© wrote: On 8/6/2013 2:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. Or a union home recruitment visit. I hear they can get mighty rough. Problem is, if you do what harry says, you will see that he is full of ****... What's that? |
|
#73
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
On 8/6/13 8:03 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/6/2013 6:56 PM, Hank© wrote: On 8/6/2013 2:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. Or a union home recruitment visit. I hear they can get mighty rough. Problem is, if you do what harry says, you will see that he is full of ****... There are plenty of legitimate videos of tea bagger rallies and meetings and such, and of the horrific thug behavior of the speakers and participants, the people who appeal to psychotics...like you. |
|
#74
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? He had one arrest and no charges. Martin had none. But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault) when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the back. 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony What was Martin arrested for again? Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was a minor. |
|
#75
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
In article ,
says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? He had one arrest and no charges. Martin had none. But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault) when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the back. 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony What was Martin arrested for again? Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was a minor. Booger is setting the bar for malfesence very high. No actual arrest then nothing bad happened. |
|
#76
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
In article ,
says... On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... Low life Jawbone Scotty at it again. |
|
#77
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
|
|
#78
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
On 8/7/13 7:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... Low life Jawbone Scotty at it again. I am looking forward to the next cable channel reality show starring Psychoscotty and family, something like "Swamp Rats," or "Landfill Slackers," complete with firearms, crank, tattoos, ATVs, ER visits, police drive-bys and, of course, for the patriarch, "Pint Sized Punching Pop." |
|
#79
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
In article ,
says... In article , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? He had one arrest and no charges. Martin had none. But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault) when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the back. 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony What was Martin arrested for again? Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was a minor. Booger is setting the bar for malfesence very high. No actual arrest then nothing bad happened. So, following your logic, one can be found guilty of heinous crimes without being arrested, and going to court? |
|
#80
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which...
In article ,
says... On 8/7/13 7:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... Low life Jawbone Scotty at it again. I am looking forward to the next cable channel reality show starring Psychoscotty and family, something like "Swamp Rats," or "Landfill Slackers," complete with firearms, crank, tattoos, ATVs, ER visits, police drive-bys and, of course, for the patriarch, "Pint Sized Punching Pop." The trailer will be Scotty holding his jawbone and screaming nasty vulgar things about people's wives and children...... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
