On 8/3/13 10:54 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:00:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/3/13 1:14 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 21:13:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Scandal? What scandal? You are the very definition of a psychotic.

They are as much a scandal as Trayvonn Martin but what did the media
focus on (and still is)


Working as a diplomat in an unsettled country has always been a risky
business. Shootings, bombings, whatever. Is it a scandal whenever this
happens, or just when a black dude is POTUS? In 1983, the U.S. Embassy
in Beirut was bombed and 63 were killed. I don't recall that incident
being called a scandal. Oh, wait, a white dude was POTUS.


How many ambassadors were killed ?


Whether or not it is a scandal depends upon the rank of those killed?
That's kind of bizarre.

On 8/3/13 1:00 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:02:16 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/3/13 10:54 AM, wrote:


How many ambassadors were killed ?


Whether or not it is a scandal depends upon the rank of those killed?
That's kind of bizarre.

Not as bizarre as a scandal and national tragedy based on the color of
the person killed.
A couple of losers get in a fight and one of them dies thousands of
times a year but only one really makes the news? THAT is bizarre.


I always enjoy your bizarre attempts to find moral equivalencies.
Zimmerman murdered Martin and got away with it. If Martin had been a
white suburban kid, Zimmerman would be in the slammer right now.

On 8/3/2013 1:57 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/3/13 1:00 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:02:16 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/3/13 10:54 AM, wrote:


How many ambassadors were killed ?


Whether or not it is a scandal depends upon the rank of those killed?
That's kind of bizarre.

Not as bizarre as a scandal and national tragedy based on the color of
the person killed.
A couple of losers get in a fight and one of them dies thousands of
times a year but only one really makes the news? THAT is bizarre.


I always enjoy your bizarre attempts to find moral equivalencies.
Zimmerman murdered Martin and got away with it. If Martin had been a
white suburban kid, Zimmerman would be in the slammer right now.

Oh! That's much better! Snerk!

On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:57:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/3/13 1:00 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:02:16 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/3/13 10:54 AM, wrote:


How many ambassadors were killed ?


Whether or not it is a scandal depends upon the rank of those killed?
That's kind of bizarre.

Not as bizarre as a scandal and national tragedy based on the color of
the person killed.
A couple of losers get in a fight and one of them dies thousands of
times a year but only one really makes the news? THAT is bizarre.


I always enjoy your bizarre attempts to find moral equivalencies.
Zimmerman murdered Martin and got away with it. If Martin had been a
white suburban kid, Zimmerman would be in the slammer right now.

Nope, not if Zimmerman shot the kid while defending himself from a vicious attack,as was the case
here.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On Saturday, August 3, 2013 7:01:53 PM UTC-5, wrote:



Certainly a dead ambassador rises to a higher level than that.


Or it seems that it should, at the very least.

On 8/3/2013 8:01 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:57:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


I always enjoy your bizarre attempts to find moral equivalencies.
Zimmerman murdered Martin and got away with it. If Martin had been a
white suburban kid, Zimmerman would be in the slammer right now.

Two losers got in a fight and one of them died. How is that earth
shattering news?


There is absolutly not one shred of evidence that Zimmerman was a loser,
there is tons of evidence that Martin was.. Who are you patronizing here
with the above comment?

In article ,
says...

On 8/3/2013 8:01 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:57:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


I always enjoy your bizarre attempts to find moral equivalencies.
Zimmerman murdered Martin and got away with it. If Martin had been a
white suburban kid, Zimmerman would be in the slammer right now.

Two losers got in a fight and one of them died. How is that earth
shattering news?


There is absolutly not one shred of evidence that Zimmerman was a loser,
there is tons of evidence that Martin was.. Who are you patronizing here
with the above comment?

Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a
police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a
loser?????

On 8/4/13 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 8/3/2013 8:01 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:57:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


I always enjoy your bizarre attempts to find moral equivalencies.
Zimmerman murdered Martin and got away with it. If Martin had been a
white suburban kid, Zimmerman would be in the slammer right now.

Two losers got in a fight and one of them died. How is that earth
shattering news?


There is absolutly not one shred of evidence that Zimmerman was a loser,
there is tons of evidence that Martin was.. Who are you patronizing here
with the above comment?

Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a
police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a
loser?????


Normal behavior for PsychoScotty, who claims the cops shoved him on the
stairs and relieved him of his $600 drug buy cash.

wrote in message ...

On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:25:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a
police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a
loser?????

Cite

--------------------------------

If iboater's idea of "battering" is giving someone a shove, I'd be
leery of blowing my nose within 10 feet of him. He would probably
claim attempted murder.

Zimmerman was initially charged with assault with violence, but that
was quickly changed to assault without violence, and then the charge
was dropped completely. He was coming to the aid of a friend while
drinking who was being restrained by a plain clothed LEO who's
identity was unknown to Zimmerman when he shoved him. Doesn't sound
all that unusual or bad to me. Sounds more like a good friend.

As for "beating his wife" .... there have been no records presented
that support that. There were mutual court orders to stay away from
each other based on mutual accusations of domestic violence.
Domestic violence can consist of physical abuse but can also be
emotional abuse, neglect and other physically passive actions.
Yelling at each other can be domestic violence.

On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:20:43 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



wrote in message ...

On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:25:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a
police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a
loser?????

Cite

--------------------------------

If iboater's idea of "battering" is giving someone a shove, I'd be
leery of blowing my nose within 10 feet of him. He would probably
claim attempted murder.

Zimmerman was initially charged with assault with violence, but that
was quickly changed to assault without violence, and then the charge
was dropped completely. He was coming to the aid of a friend while
drinking who was being restrained by a plain clothed LEO who's
identity was unknown to Zimmerman when he shoved him. Doesn't sound
all that unusual or bad to me. Sounds more like a good friend.

As for "beating his wife" .... there have been no records presented
that support that. There were mutual court orders to stay away from
each other based on mutual accusations of domestic violence.
Domestic violence can consist of physical abuse but can also be
emotional abuse, neglect and other physically passive actions.
Yelling at each other can be domestic violence.




There you go popping Kevin's bubbles. A 'battering' and a 'beating' is what Zimmerman got at the
hands of Trayvon.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!