BoatBanter.com - Which...

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)

- - Which... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/157848-a.html)

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 06:51:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/5/13 9:47 PM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, August 5, 2013 7:34:43 AM UTC-5, John H wrote:

Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to

that effect.

John (Gun Nut) H.

Cite?

Right here!

http://tinyurl.com/o42at

Learn to read!

John (Gun Nut) H.

READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay

about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are

bull****, right?

Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this:

8/8/01

Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both

the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations

more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until

everyone's opinion is heard at least three times.

*My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for

*criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York

State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted

ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it.

--

Harry Krause

------------

John (Gun Nut) H.

--

Hope you're having a great day!

Oh man.

Hey, it wasn't as if I lied my country into a war against Iraq or
Afghanistan, and there was no criminal penalty for public employee
strikes in the state at that time. The judge ordered striking teachers
back to work, but the only penalty for them was to lose two days pay for
every day the strike lasted, and the issue was such that the teachers
were willing to stay out a while longer. The strike was not over pay.

So the judge ordered each teacher to line up in front of the courthouse
so he or she could be individually served with his back to work order. I
had the teachers that showed up for that "show of force" come out the
back door of the courthouse so they could plop those orders into a steel
trash bin in which I had a fire burning.

All was forgiven by the end of the day, the strike lasted another few
days, and the board of education agreed to go back to the bargaining
table and negotiate, which was what the strike was all about, because
the public employee statutes required the board to negotiate "in good
faith," and the strike came about because it refused to do so.
Unfortunately at the time there were no civil penalties to force the
board back to the bargaining table.

Oh, there were no weapons involved, and no one got shoved. Peaceful
civil disobedience, as it were.

Gosh, Zimmerman all over again.

John (Gun Nut) H.

Damn you ARE senile or stupid. Did you not notice that Zimmerman had a
gun and shot a kid?

On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you
defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested....

What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original
contention.

1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was
drinking, by the way)
2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence.

Now, what was Martin ever charged with again??

Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE.

Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states
attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge.

Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives.

Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin,
until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded
it. (for political reasons, not facts)
In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of
the shooting was the right one., There was no case there.
Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the
verdict and he explained why.
Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to
stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping.

Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing.......

....'cause he attacked someone and got his ass shot.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:51:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:26:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Damn you ARE senile or stupid. Did you not notice that Zimmerman had a
gun and shot a kid?

... who had attacked him and was beating the **** out of him.

Zimmerman had his day in court and he was exonerated. Get over it.

So that makes what John said correct????

Absolutely. Here's the cite: http://tinyurl.com/o42at

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!