| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Picked up...
On 8/1/13 9:14 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
Just about everything you need to know about Harry can be found right he Ohhh...the bankster speaketh. |
Picked up...
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 5:36:03 PM UTC-4, Hank© wrote:
I have a better idea. Why don't the pair of you dimwits take your mindless chatter off the net entirely. AWESOME idea!!! Unfortunately, Donnie is so used to publicly sucking Harrys dick, he cant stop. |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:20:13 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Ah, he's just gone insane again. He'll be this way for a few days, then it will be the poor poor everybody's picking on me syndrome.... Too bad no one gives a solid **** what you have to say, "steroid-brain ". |
Picked up...
On 8/1/13 9:16 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/1/13 8:13 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 8/1/13 7:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: Somebody here (forget who) recently made a comment about John suggesting that he may be a recovering alcoholic. Didn't say he *was*. Just suggested that maybe he was. It was uncalled for and obviously the poster has absolutely no idea if it is true or not. Harry liked that of course, picked up on it and within the hour was commenting on John's alcoholism, as if it was a proven fact. That's the crap that gets me ****ed off sometimes. Cute but transparent. I think it is possible Herring is an alcoholic in recovery. If he is, there's nothing wrong with that. Recovery means you are controlling the illness, and it isn't controlling you. And I surely think those Republicans who so obviously hate the poor, minorities and the disenfranchised are Republic-trash. Absolutely. ----------------------------------------- It's also possible that you (or I) are methamphetamine addicts, but there is no evidence of that being a fact. My complaint was your follow-up post insinuating that he indeed *is* an alcoholic. You have no knowledge of that that I or anyone else is aware of. As for Jim, you claim to have him in your Bozo bin, so I don't understand your frequent comments about his posts. Well, that's not true. I completely understand the purpose of your responses. I see his posts and frankly they are often funny as hell. I suspect he gets as big a kick out of your accusations and disparaging remarks about him as you enjoy making them. Pretty harmless, overall, unlike some of the mean spirited and blatantly false statements and assumptions you often make about people who don't agree with you. That's why I get ****ed off sometimes. Reminds me of five year olds sometimes. "He hit me first". Only thing is I am one of several people who actually remember who started it. I see the occasional flajim post second or third hand, when someone quotes him. And, as I posted earlier, you think flajim's snarky behavior here is "funny as hell." So it is ok when your right-wing buddy does it. Right? Hypocrisy. If you wanted a nicer newsgroup, you'd share your wrath. --------------------------------- I'd suggest that we let others be the judge and jury. Most of the "others" are right-wing Republitrash, as if you didn't know. Note that I stated "most," not all. Hey, it's okay with me...this newsgroup is in the dumpster and it isn't going to get out of there so long as a majority of the overwhelming number of righties here continue to trash everyone who doesn't share their racist, anti-ethnic, anti-female, more guns for everyone bull****. As always, have a nice day. |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:55:18 AM UTC-4, Eisboch wrote:
Didn't you tell me your buddy FlaJim thinks such behavior is fun? I'm just trying it out to see if it is true. So far, it seems like fun for the feeble minded, which, I suppose, is why your feeble-minded buddy likes it. --------------------------------------------- Please Harry. You have contributed more to the demise of rec.boats as a boating newsgroup and place of information and experience sharing than anyone else who has followed the group for any period of time. You singlehandedly have converted it into a social commentary forum and pen hateful, mean spirited comments to anyone who disagree with you unless they show you the proper respect that you seem to think you deserve. That requires others to not engage in the same type of constant insults that you do. Maybe if you backed off and allowed other points of view without instantly classifying them as trash, racist, looney or whatever the current and popular liberal descriptors are, this place could be fun to participate in again. You have to remember .... the demise of rec.boats started many years ago, primarily led by you. I think you stay here now because you get some sort of perverse, bizarre pleasure in trying to be a verbal bully. I remember when I first subscribed to rec.boats. You came across as having a well developed ego, which is ok as long as it doesn't cross the line of looking down your nose at others that don't share your views. I recognized that immediately, but realized that everyone is different and a strong ego doesn't necessarily make someone bad. But when your self assigned air of superiority leads to general insults and snarky comments, it can only result in ill feelings and a tendency to "fight back" by those you have offended. Maybe that's what you find so entertaining. I don't know. But at your age (and mine) one would think we would have outgrow it. He cant...he enjoys Donnie publicly sucking his cock. It's all he has these days. |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 3:56:05 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
You are a psychotic, and get the attention you do from your "buds" here so your fellow righties can pull your strings and the few of the rest of us who read your posts can get our giggles from the manifestations of your mental illness. Harsh but true. Someone hit a nerve.......poor, unknown, unimportant Harry and his cock-buddy, Cockhole White. |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 3:58:47 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Wow, Scotty's jawbone sure is making him go insane today!!! And once again, the king of nothing has nothing to say. |
Picked up...
On 8/1/13 8:13 PM, Eisboch wrote:
Only thing is I am one of several people who actually remember who started it. False memory syndrome, eh? :) |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 7:51:43 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I find it amusing so many righties here are so obsessed about me. That's just it...they ARENT...or are you too stupid to figure it out?? |
Picked up...
On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:33:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/1/13 9:14 PM, Wayne.B wrote: Just about everything you need to know about Harry can be found right he Ohhh...the bankster speaketh. ==== Just about everything we to know about you can be found right he http://www.lewrockwell.com/1999/09/mike/how-to-spot-a-sociopath-10redflags-that-could-save-you-from-being-swept-under-the-influence-of-a-charismatic-nutjob/ and he Identifying narcissistic sociopaths Although not all narcissists are sociopaths, all sociopaths are narcissists (Stout 2010). Therefore, if you can identify a narcissist, you’re one step closer to being able to recognize a sociopath. Below is a definition of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) and a list of narcissistic traits taken directly from the website of Dr. Sam Vaknin, author of Malignant Self-Love. (If you know someone who fits at least 5 or more of these traits, a psychiatrist could easily diagnose him/her as having NPD.) The DSM-IV-TR defines Narcissistic Personality Disorder as “an all-pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration or adulation and lack of empathy, usually beginning by early adulthood and present in various contexts,” such as family life and work. 1. Feels grandiose and self-important (e.g., exaggerates accomplishments, talents, skills, contacts, and personality traits to the point of lying, demands to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements); 2. Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome power or omnipotence, unequalled brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or ideal, everlasting, all-conquering love or passion; 3. Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special, can only be understood by, should only be treated by, or associate with, other special or unique, or high-status people (or institutions); 4. Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and affirmation – or, failing that, wishes to be feared and to be notorious (Narcissistic Supply); 5. Feels entitled. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or her unreasonable expectations for special and favorable priority treatment; 6. Is “interpersonally exploitative”, i.e., uses others to achieve his or her own ends; 7. Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with, acknowledge, or accept the feelings, needs, preferences, priorities, and choices of others; 8. Constantly envious of others and seeks to hurt or destroy the objects of his or her frustration. Suffers from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he or she believes that they feel the same about him or her and are likely to act similarly; 9. Behaves arrogantly and haughtily. Feels superior, omnipotent, omniscient, invincible, immune, “above the law”, and omnipresent (magical thinking). Rages when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted by people he or she considers inferior to him or her and unworthy (http://samvak.tripod.com). Once it’s clear you’re dealing with a narcissist, go through the following list to see if the narcissist is also a sociopath. (You’ll discover many overlapping traits from each list.) The list below of 20 sociopathic traits is taken directly from the book Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us by Dr. Robert D. Hare, Ph.D: 1. Glib and superficial charm. The tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Sociopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A sociopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example. 2. Grandiose self-worth. A grossly inflated view of one’s abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Sociopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings. 3. Need for stimulation or proneness to boredom. An excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Sociopaths often have low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine. 4. Pathological lying. Can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest. 5. Conning and manipulative. The use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one’s victims. 6. Lack of remorse or guilt. A lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one’s victims. 7. Shallow affect. Emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness. 8. Callousness and lack of empathy. A lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless. 9. Parasitic lifestyle. An intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities. 10. Poor behavioral controls. Expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily. 11. Promiscuous sexual behavior. A variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests. 12. Early behavior problems. A variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home. 13. Lack of realistic, long-term goals. An inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life. 14. Impulsivity. The occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless. 15. Irresponsibility. Repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements. 16. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions. A failure to accept responsibility for one’s actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial. 17. Many short-term marital relationships. A lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital. 18. Juvenile delinquency. Behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness. 19. Revocation of condition release. A revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear. 20. Criminal versatility. A diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes. (Hare 2011). In addition to the above two lists of traits, the biggest trait (or magic trick as I like to call it) that makes narcissistic sociopaths so dangerous and effective is their ability to go unnoticed by the rest of us. They can do this, because they are good at pretending (lying) and wearing many masks (again, lying). Simply put, they lie to themselves and everyone else. They lie so much that some of them are convinced of their own lies, which is where evil is born. http://paularenee.wordpress.com/identifying-a-narcissistic-sociopath/ |
Picked up...
On 8/1/2013 9:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/1/13 9:16 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/1/13 8:13 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 8/1/13 7:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: Somebody here (forget who) recently made a comment about John suggesting that he may be a recovering alcoholic. Didn't say he *was*. Just suggested that maybe he was. It was uncalled for and obviously the poster has absolutely no idea if it is true or not. Harry liked that of course, picked up on it and within the hour was commenting on John's alcoholism, as if it was a proven fact. That's the crap that gets me ****ed off sometimes. Cute but transparent. I think it is possible Herring is an alcoholic in recovery. If he is, there's nothing wrong with that. Recovery means you are controlling the illness, and it isn't controlling you. And I surely think those Republicans who so obviously hate the poor, minorities and the disenfranchised are Republic-trash. Absolutely. ----------------------------------------- It's also possible that you (or I) are methamphetamine addicts, but there is no evidence of that being a fact. My complaint was your follow-up post insinuating that he indeed *is* an alcoholic. You have no knowledge of that that I or anyone else is aware of. As for Jim, you claim to have him in your Bozo bin, so I don't understand your frequent comments about his posts. Well, that's not true. I completely understand the purpose of your responses. I see his posts and frankly they are often funny as hell. I suspect he gets as big a kick out of your accusations and disparaging remarks about him as you enjoy making them. Pretty harmless, overall, unlike some of the mean spirited and blatantly false statements and assumptions you often make about people who don't agree with you. That's why I get ****ed off sometimes. Reminds me of five year olds sometimes. "He hit me first". Only thing is I am one of several people who actually remember who started it. I see the occasional flajim post second or third hand, when someone quotes him. And, as I posted earlier, you think flajim's snarky behavior here is "funny as hell." So it is ok when your right-wing buddy does it. Right? Hypocrisy. If you wanted a nicer newsgroup, you'd share your wrath. --------------------------------- I'd suggest that we let others be the judge and jury. Most of the "others" are right-wing Republitrash, as if you didn't know. Note that I stated "most," not all. Hey, it's okay with me...this newsgroup is in the dumpster and it isn't going to get out of there so long as a majority of the overwhelming number of righties here continue to trash everyone who doesn't share their racist, anti-ethnic, anti-female, more guns for everyone bull****. As always, have a nice day. Have some warm milk and go to bed. Maybe you'll feel less down trodden in the morning. |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 8:55:18 AM UTC-5, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/1/13 8:48 AM, Eisboch wrote: So much for turning the newsgroup back to the "regular" insulters as you stated in a previous post. Oh. I forgot. You are a "special" insulter. Didn't you tell me your buddy FlaJim thinks such behavior is fun? I'm just trying it out to see if it is true. So far, it seems like fun for the feeble minded, which, I suppose, is why your feeble-minded buddy likes it. --------------------------------------------- Please Harry. You have contributed more to the demise of rec.boats as a boating newsgroup and place of information and experience sharing than anyone else who has followed the group for any period of time. You singlehandedly have converted it into a social commentary forum and pen hateful, mean spirited comments to anyone who disagree with you unless they show you the proper respect that you seem to think you deserve. That requires others to not engage in the same type of constant insults that you do. Maybe if you backed off and allowed other points of view without instantly classifying them as trash, racist, looney or whatever the current and popular liberal descriptors are, this place could be fun to participate in again. You have to remember .... the demise of rec.boats started many years ago, primarily led by you. I think you stay here now because you get some sort of perverse, bizarre pleasure in trying to be a verbal bully. I remember when I first subscribed to rec.boats. You came across as having a well developed ego, which is ok as long as it doesn't cross the line of looking down your nose at others that don't share your views. I recognized that immediately, but realized that everyone is different and a strong ego doesn't necessarily make someone bad. But when your self assigned air of superiority leads to general insults and snarky comments, it can only result in ill feelings and a tendency to "fight back" by those you have offended. Maybe that's what you find so entertaining. I don't know. But at your age (and mine) one would think we would have outgrow it. Here's just a partial list of the names Krause has called posters he Crap-for-Brains Turd racist pig Eat me sh*thead ball-less. Turdmonger Worthless twerp slime-filled sour old failure dumbf*ch a**hole peabrain little sh*t a puke. dumb turds dirtbags idiots numnutz obsessed a**hole dummy suck puppet trashman drippynose dimwit dipstick snarky asshole dip**** flaming ass dirtball Liar fuxked up p.o.s. rip**** little **** know-it-all asshole Reggieturd. |
Picked up...
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 6:51:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/1/13 7:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: "JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message ... What is harsh but true is what Dick has said about harry lately. Got him pinned for exactly the loser he is... --------------------------------------- It's not my goal to pin anybody. That makes me as bad as those I complain about and I plead guilty occasionally. Sometimes I get tired of people who make statements that I know to be false that are intended to disparage people they don't even know. Many of us have posted things here in the heat of debate exchanges that we later probably regret. But not Harry. Virtually everything he posts, he means and it's done for a purpose. He seems to get a perverse delight in such. I usually try to maintain a civil attitude for the most part but lately he's been ****ing me off. Examples: Somebody here (forget who) recently made a comment about John suggesting that he may be a recovering alcoholic. Didn't say he *was*. Just suggested that maybe he was. It was uncalled for and obviously the poster has absolutely no idea if it is true or not. Harry liked that of course, picked up on it and within the hour was commenting on John's alcoholism, as if it was a proven fact. That's the crap that gets me ****ed off sometimes. Cute but transparent. Then there's his endless social commentary and comments on the status of minorities, the poor and the disenfranchised. If others don't see it his way, they are obviously either racist or "republi-trash". Yet, in another thread about building permits, etc., Harry went out of his way to make sure we all are aware that he lives in a very desirable area with fine restaurants, stringent building codes and future development statutes that are intended to restrict those who may wish to build and move in. I think Harry would serve humanity better if he moved to Detroit and became a community organizer rather that call people names on a goofy newsgroup. Harry blames everyone else for the demise of rec.boats as a useful newsgroup, yet he is by far the biggest contributor to it's decline. Just ask him. It has been his goal and he delights in yanking your chain. You do go on, and yet you never try to castigate your good buddy here. Mildly interesting. We live in a nice area, but it certainly isn't the locale of the "super rich." There are only a couple of expensive restaurants around here, the building codes are ordinary but enforced, but the zoning is stringent to maintain a semi-rural atmosphere outside of the commercial areas, and there are no statutes to restrict anyone from moving in. The local impact fee, as I mentioned, may or may not still be in effect, but Gregg's area has a much higher one. I think it is possible Herring is an alcoholic in recovery. If he is, there's nothing wrong with that. Recovery means you are controlling the illness, and it isn't controlling you. And I surely think those Republicans who so obviously hate the poor, minorities and the disenfranchised are Republic-trash. Absolutely. Oh, I did live in Birmingham, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit, and I worked in downtown Detroit. I also worked a full year in Chicago for an organization run by...Saul Alinsky. When I was hired by the teachers union, I hired Alinsky to come to a conference of state teacher leaders in New York to put on presentations on how to use the system, a task at which Alinsky was unsurpassed. You mean *this* Saul Alinsky? http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2314 |
Picked up...
On 8/1/13 10:04 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:33:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/1/13 9:14 PM, Wayne.B wrote: Just about everything you need to know about Harry can be found right he Ohhh...the bankster speaketh. ==== Just about everything we to know about you can be found right he Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? That, at least, is something useful and potentially interesting. Have a nice day, bankster. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/13 12:31 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, August 1, 2013 6:51:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/1/13 7:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: "JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message ... What is harsh but true is what Dick has said about harry lately. Got him pinned for exactly the loser he is... --------------------------------------- It's not my goal to pin anybody. That makes me as bad as those I complain about and I plead guilty occasionally. Sometimes I get tired of people who make statements that I know to be false that are intended to disparage people they don't even know. Many of us have posted things here in the heat of debate exchanges that we later probably regret. But not Harry. Virtually everything he posts, he means and it's done for a purpose. He seems to get a perverse delight in such. I usually try to maintain a civil attitude for the most part but lately he's been ****ing me off. Examples: Somebody here (forget who) recently made a comment about John suggesting that he may be a recovering alcoholic. Didn't say he *was*. Just suggested that maybe he was. It was uncalled for and obviously the poster has absolutely no idea if it is true or not. Harry liked that of course, picked up on it and within the hour was commenting on John's alcoholism, as if it was a proven fact. That's the crap that gets me ****ed off sometimes. Cute but transparent. Then there's his endless social commentary and comments on the status of minorities, the poor and the disenfranchised. If others don't see it his way, they are obviously either racist or "republi-trash". Yet, in another thread about building permits, etc., Harry went out of his way to make sure we all are aware that he lives in a very desirable area with fine restaurants, stringent building codes and future development statutes that are intended to restrict those who may wish to build and move in. I think Harry would serve humanity better if he moved to Detroit and became a community organizer rather that call people names on a goofy newsgroup. Harry blames everyone else for the demise of rec.boats as a useful newsgroup, yet he is by far the biggest contributor to it's decline. Just ask him. It has been his goal and he delights in yanking your chain. You do go on, and yet you never try to castigate your good buddy here. Mildly interesting. We live in a nice area, but it certainly isn't the locale of the "super rich." There are only a couple of expensive restaurants around here, the building codes are ordinary but enforced, but the zoning is stringent to maintain a semi-rural atmosphere outside of the commercial areas, and there are no statutes to restrict anyone from moving in. The local impact fee, as I mentioned, may or may not still be in effect, but Gregg's area has a much higher one. I think it is possible Herring is an alcoholic in recovery. If he is, there's nothing wrong with that. Recovery means you are controlling the illness, and it isn't controlling you. And I surely think those Republicans who so obviously hate the poor, minorities and the disenfranchised are Republic-trash. Absolutely. Oh, I did live in Birmingham, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit, and I worked in downtown Detroit. I also worked a full year in Chicago for an organization run by...Saul Alinsky. When I was hired by the teachers union, I hired Alinsky to come to a conference of state teacher leaders in New York to put on presentations on how to use the system, a task at which Alinsky was unsurpassed. You mean *this* Saul Alinsky? http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2314 The very same. The funny thing is that Saul was far less a radical than the elected creeps and non-elected creeps who run today's Republican party. Saul's goal was to empower the powerless. The Republican credo today is to "unempower" the powerless and concentrate all the wealth in the pockets of the rich and powerful. Saul, a Russian Jew and a patriotic socialist, understood and appreciated the teachings of Jesus. Today's Republican hierarchy is more like the Roman aristocracy. |
Picked up...
On Friday, August 2, 2013 4:15:27 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/2/13 12:31 AM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, August 1, 2013 6:51:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/1/13 7:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: "JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message ... What is harsh but true is what Dick has said about harry lately. Got him pinned for exactly the loser he is... --------------------------------------- It's not my goal to pin anybody. That makes me as bad as those I complain about and I plead guilty occasionally. Sometimes I get tired of people who make statements that I know to be false that are intended to disparage people they don't even know. Many of us have posted things here in the heat of debate exchanges that we later probably regret. But not Harry. Virtually everything he posts, he means and it's done for a purpose. He seems to get a perverse delight in such. I usually try to maintain a civil attitude for the most part but lately he's been ****ing me off. Examples: Somebody here (forget who) recently made a comment about John suggesting that he may be a recovering alcoholic. Didn't say he *was*. Just suggested that maybe he was. It was uncalled for and obviously the poster has absolutely no idea if it is true or not. Harry liked that of course, picked up on it and within the hour was commenting on John's alcoholism, as if it was a proven fact. That's the crap that gets me ****ed off sometimes. Cute but transparent. Then there's his endless social commentary and comments on the status of minorities, the poor and the disenfranchised. If others don't see it his way, they are obviously either racist or "republi-trash". Yet, in another thread about building permits, etc., Harry went out of his way to make sure we all are aware that he lives in a very desirable area with fine restaurants, stringent building codes and future development statutes that are intended to restrict those who may wish to build and move in. I think Harry would serve humanity better if he moved to Detroit and became a community organizer rather that call people names on a goofy newsgroup. Harry blames everyone else for the demise of rec.boats as a useful newsgroup, yet he is by far the biggest contributor to it's decline. Just ask him. It has been his goal and he delights in yanking your chain. You do go on, and yet you never try to castigate your good buddy here. Mildly interesting. We live in a nice area, but it certainly isn't the locale of the "super rich." There are only a couple of expensive restaurants around here, the building codes are ordinary but enforced, but the zoning is stringent to maintain a semi-rural atmosphere outside of the commercial areas, and there are no statutes to restrict anyone from moving in. The local impact fee, as I mentioned, may or may not still be in effect, but Gregg's area has a much higher one. I think it is possible Herring is an alcoholic in recovery. If he is, there's nothing wrong with that. Recovery means you are controlling the illness, and it isn't controlling you. And I surely think those Republicans who so obviously hate the poor, minorities and the disenfranchised are Republic-trash. Absolutely. Oh, I did live in Birmingham, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit, and I worked in downtown Detroit. I also worked a full year in Chicago for an organization run by...Saul Alinsky. When I was hired by the teachers union, I hired Alinsky to come to a conference of state teacher leaders in New York to put on presentations on how to use the system, a task at which Alinsky was unsurpassed. You mean *this* Saul Alinsky? http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2314 The very same. The funny thing is that Saul was far less a radical than the elected creeps and non-elected creeps who run today's Republican party. Saul's goal was to empower the powerless. The Republican credo today is to "unempower" the powerless and concentrate all the wealth in the pockets of the rich and powerful. Saul, a Russian Jew and a patriotic socialist, understood and appreciated the teachings of Jesus. Today's Republican hierarchy is more like the Roman aristocracy. He was a communist that also supported anarchy, Harry. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/13 7:29 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, August 2, 2013 4:15:27 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: You mean *this* Saul Alinsky? http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2314 The very same. The funny thing is that Saul was far less a radical than the elected creeps and non-elected creeps who run today's Republican party. Saul's goal was to empower the powerless. The Republican credo today is to "unempower" the powerless and concentrate all the wealth in the pockets of the rich and powerful. Saul, a Russian Jew and a patriotic socialist, understood and appreciated the teachings of Jesus. Today's Republican hierarchy is more like the Roman aristocracy. He was a communist that also supported anarchy, Harry. Saul wasn't a communist, and said so anytime he was asked, as in this quote I swiped from wiki: Alinsky did not join political parties. When asked during an interview whether he ever considered becoming a Communist party member, he replied: Not at any time. I've never joined any organization—not even the ones I've organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it's Christianity or Marxism. One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as 'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you're right.' If you don't have that, if you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide. He wasn't an anarchist, either. But he did help the disenfranchised shake up and change the white power structure, which was a good thing then and is a good thing now. When I brought him to the teachers' convention in NY State, a number of members loudly protested. Outside of NYC at the time, the state's teachers and their unions were fairly conservative. They thought Alinsky was too radical. "That's the whole point," I told them. Right after that late summer meeting, somewhere between 50 and 60 local teachers unions called strikes, even though they were illegal. Made me proud! |
Picked up...
|
Picked up...
|
Picked up...
|
Picked up...
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. I'd mucc rather look at your photographs of natures wonders, than say, Harry's post holes and coffee pots. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from the group? What a ****ing asshole... |
Picked up...
On 8/2/13 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. Neither the photos nor the women were that good. But I'll bet they made you almost remember when you last had a woodie. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/13 8:21 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from the group? What a ****ing asshole... Never happened, asshole. |
Picked up...
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content working for crap wages. === Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going down hill ever since. |
Picked up...
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:10:14 -0400, Hank©
wrote: Can you think of any other highly educated individual who would sit at his keyboard for fifteen years and suffer the abuse that he absorbs on a daily basis? He's quite a guy. === Because of his personality disorder he thrives on attention, any kind of attention. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/13 9:02 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content working for crap wages. === Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going down hill ever since. Sure, w'hine, sure. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/2013 8:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/2/13 8:21 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from the group? What a ****ing asshole... Never happened, asshole. Yup, it sure did happen, asshat. |
Picked up...
On 8/2/2013 9:02 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content working for crap wages. === Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going down hill ever since. exactly |
Picked up...
|
Picked up...
On 8/2/13 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away? === Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much drooling over those pictures. This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from the group? What a ****ing asshole... And Scotty goes insane once again!!! Damned jawbone must be giving him fits this week!!! The photo in question was one madcow posted herself on the power squadron website. D'oh. But of course Snotty is about as far removed from sanity as you can still be and not be housed at a mental health facility. |
Picked up...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 8/2/13 9:02 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content working for crap wages. === Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going down hill ever since. Sure, w'hine, sure. --------------------------- I think anyone who has had kids in school in the past 25-30 years would agree. A few teachers stand out, but not many anymore. |
Picked up...
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:02:51 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content working for crap wages. === Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going down hill ever since. Been there, done that, and you're right. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Picked up...
On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:19:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/1/13 8:13 PM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 8/1/13 7:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: Somebody here (forget who) recently made a comment about John suggesting that he may be a recovering alcoholic. Didn't say he *was*. Just suggested that maybe he was. It was uncalled for and obviously the poster has absolutely no idea if it is true or not. Harry liked that of course, picked up on it and within the hour was commenting on John's alcoholism, as if it was a proven fact. That's the crap that gets me ****ed off sometimes. Cute but transparent. I think it is possible Herring is an alcoholic in recovery. If he is, there's nothing wrong with that. Recovery means you are controlling the illness, and it isn't controlling you. And I surely think those Republicans who so obviously hate the poor, minorities and the disenfranchised are Republic-trash. Absolutely. ----------------------------------------- It's also possible that you (or I) are methamphetamine addicts, but there is no evidence of that being a fact. My complaint was your follow-up post insinuating that he indeed *is* an alcoholic. You have no knowledge of that that I or anyone else is aware of. As for Jim, you claim to have him in your Bozo bin, so I don't understand your frequent comments about his posts. Well, that's not true. I completely understand the purpose of your responses. I see his posts and frankly they are often funny as hell. I suspect he gets as big a kick out of your accusations and disparaging remarks about him as you enjoy making them. Pretty harmless, overall, unlike some of the mean spirited and blatantly false statements and assumptions you often make about people who don't agree with you. That's why I get ****ed off sometimes. Reminds me of five year olds sometimes. "He hit me first". Only thing is I am one of several people who actually remember who started it. I see the occasional flajim post second or third hand, when someone quotes him. And, as I posted earlier, you think flajim's snarky behavior here is "funny as hell." So it is ok when your right-wing buddy does it. Right? Hypocrisy. If you wanted a nicer newsgroup, you'd share your wrath. Then you should stop reading Donnie's responses to him. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Picked up...
On 7/31/2013 8:54 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...a good tip at the marina for cleaning vinyl covered boat cushions and was going to post it here, but then I remembered that posting a decent boating tip would only get the right-wing slugs who live here moving, so I reconsidered and decided...nah. Rec.Boats is a *great place* to not post boating tips and information. :) Are you the same person that posted: Posit: What Republicans are telling working Americans, the middle class, is that you will work for lower wages, without health care, and without retirement, *or* we will wreck the U.S. economy. AND Which... A Dating ad for... ....George Zimmerman on Christian Mingles... AND ....bat**** crazy poster here was claiming the White House was behind the IRS-Tea Bagger "scandal"? Why, Darrell Issa's illegitimate son, AND Cucci, cucci, coo... You'd think if you were the GOP nominee for governor and you wanted to succeed a scandal-ridden GOP governor, you'd want to be a bit less crooked, especially if you were the sitting attorney general of the state. Nah, not the cucc...Ken Cuccinelli, who wants to be the next governor of Virginia. Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli says he's glad Gov. Bob McDonnell is returning all the gifts he received from a major political donor. But he has no plans to repay the more than $18,000 in gifts he received from the same benefactor. Cuccinelli told reporters Wednesday that Star Scientific CEO Jonnie Williams didn't give him the kind of gifts that can be returned. Among the gifts from Williams listed in Cuccinelli's financial disclosure statements are a $1,500 catered Thanksgiving dinner, private jet trips and vacation lodging. Cuccinelli said, "There are some bells you can't unring." - - - Will the bell toll for the Cucc? AND Sad News... Well, not all *that* sad. Fewer Than Ten People Show Up For Ex-Gay Pride Event That Expected to Draw 'Thousands' Yesterday, American Family Radio’s Sandy Rios spoke to Ex-Gay Pride Month organizer Christopher Doyle about today’s ex-gay lobby day on Capitol Hill. Doyle, who was organizing the since-canceled Ex-Gay Pride banquet at the Family Research Council, complained in an interview with the Christian Post that “un-American” LGBT rights advocates have “shut us out,” explaining that “because of all this homo-fascism and indoctrination in the media, ex-gays aren’t given a fair shake.” Rios confidently predicted that “thousands of ex-gays are descending” on Washington for a press conference planned for today at the Supreme Court. She lamented that when she led Concerned Women for America the media refused to hear “our ex-gay friends” because it “undermined the whole effort of the homosexual lobby.” Doyle told Rios that “tens of thousands” of ex-gays exist but are “in the closet because of fear, shame and threats from gay activists.” Well, despite the expectation that “thousands of ex-gays” would partake in Ex-Gay Pride Month, fewer than ten people showed up for the big event. Besides Doyle, ex-gay activists Greg Quinlan of Parents and Friends of Gays and Ex-Gays (PFOX), Richard Cohen of the International Healing Foundation and Douglas McIntyre of Homosexuals Anonymous also participated. - - - The Family Research Council is one of the biggest crocks of crap in the United States. And this only goes back two days! Mikek |
Picked up...
F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/31/13 1:12 PM, True North wrote: On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 10:54:12 UTC-3, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...a good tip at the marina for cleaning vinyl covered boat cushions and was going to post it here, but then I remembered that posting a decent boating tip would only get the right-wing slugs who live here moving, so I reconsidered and decided...nah. Rec.Boats is a *great place* to not post boating tips and information. :) Those #$@%# slugs sure interfere with the sharing of information. I had some Auto-Glym Vinyl & Rubber Care product made in England kicking around the house, so I used that on my boat seat vinyl. So far...so good. Can you e-mail your tip directly to me? Of course. Let me know if you get it. I seem to have several email addys for you. Sure you do. You exchange emails regularly, lying tax cheat. |
Picked up...
On Friday, August 2, 2013 8:00:37 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Changed your meds did they? No..he just posted a picture of you on his wall, and laughs at it every day. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com