![]() |
|
Halliburton gets a bitty fine for destroying Gulf of Mexico spillrecords
True North wrote:
Appears so. To survive doing that work he'd have to find the money to buy a tractor that could have various augers attached. Learn to quote, moron. |
Halliburton gets a bitty fine for destroying Gulf of Mexico spillrecords
On 7/27/2013 8:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:41:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:54:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/27/13 2:27 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:04:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: This guy is a contractor, actually pumping tanks is a fraction of his business but it does generate a lot of service work where the money really is. Oh, I thought we were discussing a guy who made $150,000 a year pumping out sewage from residential septic tanks and replacing the occasional valve. Obviously, we are not. I did say septic contractor. He started with a single pumper truck but he expanded his license to include construction and repair of those systems. It is still a fairly small company and he subs out a lot of the work but it is a pretty high profit business. My buddy who has two trucks makes a LOT of $$ If you are a small enough operator not to attract too much attention, a lot of that money is just "cash" ;-) Not so much around here anymore... every drop is monitored, weighed and accounted for, for the DEP...and of course, the tax man. Ended about 15 years ago really when Al Gore and Billary were selling the nation on Global Taxing... |
Halliburton gets a bitty fine for destroying Gulf of Mexico spill records
In article ,
says... On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:41:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:54:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/27/13 2:27 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:04:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: This guy is a contractor, actually pumping tanks is a fraction of his business but it does generate a lot of service work where the money really is. Oh, I thought we were discussing a guy who made $150,000 a year pumping out sewage from residential septic tanks and replacing the occasional valve. Obviously, we are not. I did say septic contractor. He started with a single pumper truck but he expanded his license to include construction and repair of those systems. It is still a fairly small company and he subs out a lot of the work but it is a pretty high profit business. My buddy who has two trucks makes a LOT of $$ If you are a small enough operator not to attract too much attention, a lot of that money is just "cash" ;-) Yup! |
Halliburton gets a bitty fine for destroying Gulf of Mexico spill records
In article ,
says... On 7/27/2013 8:23 PM, wrote: On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:41:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:54:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/27/13 2:27 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:04:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: This guy is a contractor, actually pumping tanks is a fraction of his business but it does generate a lot of service work where the money really is. Oh, I thought we were discussing a guy who made $150,000 a year pumping out sewage from residential septic tanks and replacing the occasional valve. Obviously, we are not. I did say septic contractor. He started with a single pumper truck but he expanded his license to include construction and repair of those systems. It is still a fairly small company and he subs out a lot of the work but it is a pretty high profit business. My buddy who has two trucks makes a LOT of $$ If you are a small enough operator not to attract too much attention, a lot of that money is just "cash" ;-) Not so much around here anymore... every drop is monitored, weighed and accounted for, for the DEP...and of course, the tax man. Ended about 15 years ago really when Al Gore and Billary were selling the nation on Global Taxing... Oh, so you think a truck full of **** should be able to be dumped anywhere at anytime?? Figures. |
Halliburton gets a bitty fine for destroying Gulf of Mexico spill records
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/27/2013 8:23 PM, wrote: On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:41:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:54:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/27/13 2:27 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:04:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: This guy is a contractor, actually pumping tanks is a fraction of his business but it does generate a lot of service work where the money really is. Oh, I thought we were discussing a guy who made $150,000 a year pumping out sewage from residential septic tanks and replacing the occasional valve. Obviously, we are not. I did say septic contractor. He started with a single pumper truck but he expanded his license to include construction and repair of those systems. It is still a fairly small company and he subs out a lot of the work but it is a pretty high profit business. My buddy who has two trucks makes a LOT of $$ If you are a small enough operator not to attract too much attention, a lot of that money is just "cash" ;-) Not so much around here anymore... every drop is monitored, weighed and accounted for, for the DEP...and of course, the tax man. Ended about 15 years ago really when Al Gore and Billary were selling the nation on Global Taxing... Oh, so you think a truck full of **** should be able to be dumped anywhere at anytime?? Figures. Do not know about your region, but here the truck driver pulls in, states the county and city the waste came from and then dumps the **** in to the treatment plant receptor. My buddy who is retired IBM owned a porta potty company in years ago. I moved and sold my half. He made enough money to send his kids to university. One to Cal Poly. Sure there was some cash payments for a weekend part rental, but most were monthly rentals to contractors. |
Halliburton gets a bitty fine for destroying Gulf of Mexico spill records
In article , says...
wrote in message ... I retired at 49, I am living on the water in the sunshine and we are comfortable, not owing anyone any money. I did OK. ------------------------------ When I was in my early 40's I set a goal of having the option to retire by the time I was 55. Made it with 2 years to spare. It's amazing what can be accomplished if you establish a serious goal. Everything you do, every decision you make becomes contingent upon not obscuring the goal but rather trying to support it, if possible. In my case it wasn't trying to make as much money as I could so I could retire early. When I worked for others I was not highly paid and when I started my company, I was often one of the lowest paid people as it struggled to get going in the early years. Instead, I focused on building the value of the company in terms of it's products and technology and it ultimately paid off, not only for me but for my small group of stockholders and for all the employees who also shared in the proceeds of the sale. When I reflect back on things I've done in my life so far it cracks me up sometimes. I am far from being particularly smart and I certainly am not overly educated. Nothing I learned in formal schools contributed much towards what I later did for a living because until the mid 1990's there were no formal college level courses or degrees offered in the technology in which I became involved. Probably a good thing because it caused me and others who worked in the field to constantly self-educate, try things and be creative. Looking back, I can see how a degree in a specific field or technical discipline can sometimes become a limiting factor because many of the rules have already been established. I call it the Edison Syndrome. He never went to school to get a technical degree and later one of his associates claimed that had Edison gone to college he would have learned that many of the things he accomplished were impossible to achieve. If I had stuck with being an electronics engineer, I'd probably still be designing high voltage power supplies for some company somewhere. Following nine years in the military, going to school part time and then at nights under the GI bill after I got out, I've been involved as a principle in three companies. The first, back in 1981, was as a minor, sweat equity stock holder. The second was as the principle founder and CEO of the company that I eventually sold. The third was the more recent and goofy "retirement" guitar shop project that grew more than I really intended or wanted it to. It didn't take long for me to realize that I was never designed for working in a retail environment, so I turned the shop over to a good friend who has more skill and patience in that than I. Second to staying married to an incredibly understanding and supportive wife of 43 years and raising three kids, I am most proud of the fact that all three of the companies I either directly created or helped create are still in business, supporting the families of many people. That's a good feeling when I allow myself a pat on the back. All of which leads me to a reflection on this country's current status and trends. This is mostly for Harry, assuming he's still reading this. I believe in the concept of free enterprise and the right of everyone to attempt to achieve whatever their goals are. It's not right for a company to take advantage of people in it's pursuit of profit but at the same time it's not right to discourage those who want to achieve more through hard work to be discouraged by overly repressive government policies designed to "average out" the rewards. I fear that the latter is the current trend, not simply by attempted legislation but also by the perpetuation of a social "mood" that businesses and the management of them are the enemy. Not all people aspire to the same goals. Their rewards should be consistent with the effort they put into them. Well said! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com