I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

On 7/19/13 11:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4


Probably was herring, flajim and snotty.

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4

Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are
issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court.

This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero

http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86

But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be
surprised.

I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man.

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4

Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are
issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court.

This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero

http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86

But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be
surprised.

I'm sorry, just what do you links and banter about people in Oakland
have to do with the graffiti that I posted and who might have done it?

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

On 7/19/2013 12:43 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4

Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are
issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court.

This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero

http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86

But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be
surprised.

I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man.


Is he eviler than you? I'm guessing you would say yes since he doesn'f
follow your Pied Piper.
Pssssst! You'll drown too if you don't step out of line.

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4

Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are
issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court.

This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero

http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86

But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be
surprised.

I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man.

So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him.

So what is your point?

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

On 7/19/13 4:01 PM, wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 19:44:08 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man.

So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him.

So what is your point?

What is your singular obsession with Cheney when we have had so many
politicians making bad decisions that killed millions of people?


Cheney is a criminal who should have been prosecuted. He wasn't. Why are
you so upset over a magazine cover that shows the Boston bomber, who is
far lesser of a criminal than Cheney, who appeared on many magazine covers?

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

On 7/19/13 4:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:09:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/19/13 4:01 PM, wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 19:44:08 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man.

So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him.

So what is your point?

What is your singular obsession with Cheney when we have had so many
politicians making bad decisions that killed millions of people?


Cheney is a criminal who should have been prosecuted. He wasn't. Why are
you so upset over a magazine cover that shows the Boston bomber, who is
far lesser of a criminal than Cheney, who appeared on many magazine covers?

Cheney is a politician who made policy decisions you don't agree with
but congress did.
The other guy is a terrorist


A terrorist makes war upon civilians. Cheney qualifies as a terrorist.

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

On 7/19/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:44:25 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:29:39 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/lzephd4

Yup the liberals are the ones who rioted in Oakland this week and are
issuing death threats against a man exonerated by the court.

This is a glam shot of another liberal magazine's current hero

http://tinyurl.com/l9ovd86

But they put Charles Manson on their cover too so who should be
surprised.

I'm sorry, just what do you links and banter about people in Oakland
have to do with the graffiti that I posted and who might have done it?

You think graffiti rises to the level of arson, theft and general
mayhem?
How about all the death threats Z has had?

I know, you think he should be murdered too.



I doubt iLoogy wants Zimmerman murdered. I don't, either, but I think it
would be appropriate for him to face the same situation he forced on
Martin, with the other guy armed, too.

In at least part of the Old West, if you confronted an unarmed man on
the street and ended up shooting him, the townfolk would string you up.

I'd bet it wasn't a liberal that did this.....
 

On 7/19/2013 4:01 PM, wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 19:44:08 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On 19 Jul 2013 16:43:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

I've seen dick Cheney on magazine covers ..and he is a far worse evil man.

So was LBJ and they name government buildings after him.

So what is your point?

What is your singular obsession with Cheney when we have had so many
politicians making bad decisions that killed millions of people?


Our current POTUS gave up decades of work, blood, and treasure in the
Middle East to the Muslim Brotherhood... I guess Harry supports them too.