LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default A rec.boaters right-wing hero, no doubt.

Wis. Man: I Killed Teen Neighbor for 'Justice'


MILWAUKEE July 19, 2013 (AP) A Milwaukee man who killed his 13-year-old
neighbor last year testified Thursday the shooting was "justice" because
he thought the teen had broken into his home and stolen weapons.

John Henry Spooner, 76, said the suspicion that Darius Simmons stole
expensive shotguns of deep sentimental value left him "very, very
angry." Police searched Darius' home after the shooting and didn't find
the weapons.

A prosecutor alleged that Spooner traded the boy's life for guns in a
desire for revenge.

"I wouldn't call it revenge. I would call it justice," Spooner said
defiantly, drawing audible gasps from the courtroom. Darius' mother,
Patricia Larry, threw up her hands and muttered, "Oh my god."
Teen Fatally Shot-Milwaukee.JPEG

Spooner was testifying against the advice of his lawyer. Defense
attorney Franklyn Gimbel told the judge during morning proceedings that
his client had suddenly lost the mental competence to continue with the
trial. The judge halted proceedings for a few hours until a
court-appointed psychiatrist performed a brief examination and
pronounced Spooner competent to continue.

Spooner was convicted Wednesday of first-degree intentional homicide.
That verdict advanced the trial to a second phase to determine whether
Spooner was sane at the time of the May 2012 shooting. The second phase
was expected to wrap up Friday with testimony from a doctor hired by the
prosecution. A doctor retained by the defense testified Wednesday that
Spooner had anger issues that caused him to periodically detach from
reality.

If the same jurors who convicted Spooner decide he was competent, he'll
face life in prison. If they conclude he was mentally ill, he could be
committed.

Spooner didn't testify in the first phase. The judge asked him Thursday
if he wanted to testify in the second phase, and Spooner said he'd
prefer to give a 15-minute statement. When told he could only address
the jury in the form of sworn testimony and cross-examination, he agreed
to take the stand.

Spooner mostly spoke in a calm voice but sounded anguished as he
recounted how he confronted Darius and shot him in the chest. He
recalled that someone had stolen four shotguns from his home two days
earlier, and he was frustrated by a limited police response.

Gimbel asked him what caused him to shoot the boy.

"I wanted my guns back," Spooner replied, squeezing his eyes shut and
resting his head against his fingertips. "I just wanted them back so bad."

Spooner never denied shooting Darius, and acknowledged wanting to kill
the teen's older brother as well. Theodore Larry, 18, had rushed into
the street to help his wounded brother.

"If there weren't other people behind him you would have shot him,"
prosecutor Mark Williams offered.

"I would have shot him," Spooner replied.

The strongest piece of evidence against Spooner was footage from his own
surveillance cameras, which showed him confronting Darius on the
sidewalk and pointing a handgun at him. The boy backpedaled a few steps
with his hands up. Spooner then exchanged words with Darius' mother on
her porch off screen, and then turned and fired one shot at Darius' chest.

The teen fled, and Spooner fired a second shot that missed. He tried to
shoot a third time but the gun jammed.

Darius died a few moments later across the street, in his mother's arms.

Gimbel conceded from the outset that Spooner killed the boy, but argued
during the first phase that the homicide may have been reckless but not
intentional, because Spooner didn't mean for the shot to be fatal. The
jury deliberated for about an hour Wednesday before rejecting that argument.

Spooner had entered two pleas to the homicide charge: not guilty and not
guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. That set up the trial to
be conducted in two phases: the first to determine whether he was guilty
of the homicide, and if so, a second to determine whether he was
mentally competent at the time.

While Spooner didn't deny what he did, he had a hard time explaining to
the prosecutor why he did it.

When Williams asked if he took the safety off the gun because he wanted
to kill the boy, Spooner said he didn't know. Williams asked why Spooner
fired a second time and Spooner again said he didn't know.

Finally, Williams asked whether Spooner felt bad about taking Darius' life.

"Not that bad," he replied softly.

- - -

Give it a few years and it'll be Herring, Snotty, BertramFart or FlaJim...

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
for all those who doubt America [email protected] General 0 August 7th 11 02:33 AM
Right Wing loses, Left Wing Wins Big H K[_3_] General 0 July 13th 09 11:58 AM
River of Doubt Mothra General 5 January 11th 07 11:17 PM
No Doubt..... Capt. Mooron ASA 16 September 5th 04 10:41 PM
S.S in the Bahamas, I doubt it! Whplash4 ASA 14 October 17th 03 12:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017