On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

On 7/16/13 1:44 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that...


Under suspicion? Any arrests? No? Then, bull****.

On 7/17/2013 2:21 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:50:27 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 1:44 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that...


Under suspicion? Any arrests? No? Then, bull****.

The cops arrest less 1% of the people who commit burglaries, even when
they have a pretty good idea who they are. That is why the term "known
to the police" is used for people who have never actually taken a
charge.
We had that here in our string of thefts. The cops said they were
pretty sure who it was but they still did not have any hard evidence.
After about a year they finally got what they needed ..,. after a
homeowner caught the guy and held him at gunpoint until the cops got
there. When they searched his house, they closed dozens of cases.


Take Whitey Bulger for example. He, like Treevon was under suspicion for
quite a few crimes before he was caught several decades later and arrested.

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a
pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing
criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in
his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not
doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until
after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

---------------------------------

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police
record.

On 7/16/2013 1:55 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

---------------------------------

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police record.



No, you directly addressed the assertion that he (Martin) had an
*increasing* criminal record. I assumed your meant that you "disagree
with the (your) assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record"... when you said: I disagree with your assertion of Martin
having an "increasing criminal record".

Sorry if I read it wrong... My point is (in case you decide to go back
and read what you wrote, and the context of the topic at hand) that it
seems that Martin indeed did have a great possibility of developing an
"increasing criminal record" sooner than later... But again, you could
have read you wrong

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:55 PM, Eisboch replied to Greg with:


--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing
criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in
his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



Then Scotty pipes up with:

He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not
doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you
know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until
after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly
what
Treyvon was all about.

To which I (Eisboch) said:

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police
record.


------------------------------

OMG Scott! You wonder why you get teased.

What I wrote is quoted above. It was in reply to a statement by Greg
that Martin has an "increasing criminal record".
I simply stated that Martin does *not* have a criminal record period.

Now you come back with this. It's an exact quote of what you just
posted:

"No, you directly addressed the assertion that he (Martin) had an
*increasing* criminal record. I assumed your meant that you "disagree
with the (your) assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record"... when you said: I disagree with your assertion of Martin
having an "increasing criminal record".

(I confess. I have to spend some time dissecting that paragraph for a
while. Meanwhile, you added

"Sorry if I read it wrong... My point is (in case you decide to go
back
and read what you wrote, and the context of the topic at hand) that it
seems that Martin indeed did have a great possibility of developing an
"increasing criminal record" sooner than later... But again, you could
have read you wrong"

The fact remains, Martin does *not* have a criminal record period.
It's not increasing. It's not decreasing. It doesn't exist.
Meanwhile, I'll try to figure out what, "But again, you could have
read you wrong" means.

Scott, I am not trying to poke fun at you, but I simply can't
understand what you are trying to write sometimes.

In article ,
says...

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:55 PM, Eisboch replied to Greg with:


--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing
criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in
his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



Then Scotty pipes up with:

He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not
doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you
know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until
after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly
what
Treyvon was all about.

To which I (Eisboch) said:

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police
record.


------------------------------

OMG Scott! You wonder why you get teased.

What I wrote is quoted above. It was in reply to a statement by Greg
that Martin has an "increasing criminal record".
I simply stated that Martin does *not* have a criminal record period.

Now you come back with this. It's an exact quote of what you just
posted:

"No, you directly addressed the assertion that he (Martin) had an
*increasing* criminal record. I assumed your meant that you "disagree
with the (your) assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record"... when you said: I disagree with your assertion of Martin
having an "increasing criminal record".

(I confess. I have to spend some time dissecting that paragraph for a
while. Meanwhile, you added

"Sorry if I read it wrong... My point is (in case you decide to go
back
and read what you wrote, and the context of the topic at hand) that it
seems that Martin indeed did have a great possibility of developing an
"increasing criminal record" sooner than later... But again, you could
have read you wrong"

The fact remains, Martin does *not* have a criminal record period.
It's not increasing. It's not decreasing. It doesn't exist.
Meanwhile, I'll try to figure out what, "But again, you could have
read you wrong" means.

Scott, I am not trying to poke fun at you, but I simply can't
understand what you are trying to write sometimes.

He's truly insane, I can just see him writhing and spitting and going
nuts with every post, then because he's in a complete insane rant, can't
put two or three sentences together.

On 7/16/2013 3:53 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:55 PM, Eisboch replied to Greg with:


--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



Then Scotty pipes up with:

He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

To which I (Eisboch) said:

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police record.


------------------------------

OMG Scott! You wonder why you get teased.

What I wrote is quoted above. It was in reply to a statement by Greg
that Martin has an "increasing criminal record".
I simply stated that Martin does *not* have a criminal record period.

Now you come back with this. It's an exact quote of what you just posted:

"No, you directly addressed the assertion that he (Martin) had an
*increasing* criminal record. I assumed your meant that you "disagree
with the (your) assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record"... when you said: I disagree with your assertion of Martin
having an "increasing criminal record".

(I confess. I have to spend some time dissecting that paragraph for a
while. Meanwhile, you added

"Sorry if I read it wrong... My point is (in case you decide to go back
and read what you wrote, and the context of the topic at hand) that it
seems that Martin indeed did have a great possibility of developing an
"increasing criminal record" sooner than later... But again, you could
have read you wrong"

The fact remains, Martin does *not* have a criminal record period.

Yup, right after you said and I quote, "I disagree with your assertion
of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". Your words, not mine and that's the part of your quote I was
addressing...

Pretty simple really, I quoted you, and commented.. If you don't like my
opinion, why keep reading?
It's
not increasing. It's not decreasing. It doesn't exist.
Meanwhile, I'll try to figure out what, "But again, you could have read
you wrong" means.

Scott, I am not trying to poke fun at you, but I simply can't
understand what you are trying to write sometimes.

In article ,
says...

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a
pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing
criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in
his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not
doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until
after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

---------------------------------

Relax. All I said was that he does *not* have a criminal police
record.

Good luck with that!!!!!

In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 1:34 PM, Eisboch wrote:


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:42:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:


The kid was a thug, and he died because of it and nothing else...

It is clear he was on a track (statistically) to die, young, in a pool
of blood anyway. (black, school failure from a broken home and an
increasing criminal record)

The only anomaly was that a white guy shot him.
If it was just another black guy doing the shooting, this would not
have even made the news and it is likely nobody would have been
charged.

--------------------------------------

I disagree with your assertion of Martin having an "increasing criminal
record". He doesn't have a criminal police record period.
He was under suspension from school for having some pot residue in his
locker, but he doesn't have a criminal police record.



He was "under suspicion" for a lot more than that... but I am not doing
your homework for you... then add what he "admitted freely", you know
the thousand pieces of evidence the prosecution kept from us until after
the defense closed it's case, you have a clear picture of exactly what
Treyvon was all about.

Bull****.